View Item 

Show simple item record

Risk factors in lateral window sinus elevation surgery
dc.contributor.authorTestori, Tiziano
dc.contributor.authorWeinstein, Tommaso
dc.contributor.authorTaschieri, Silvio
dc.contributor.authorWallace, Stephen S.
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-30T15:30:36Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_14_MONTHS
dc.date.available2019-09-30T15:30:36Z
dc.date.issued2019-10
dc.identifier.citationTestori, Tiziano; Weinstein, Tommaso; Taschieri, Silvio; Wallace, Stephen S. (2019). "Risk factors in lateral window sinus elevation surgery." Periodontology 2000 81(1): 91-123.
dc.identifier.issn0906-6713
dc.identifier.issn1600-0757
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/151277
dc.description.abstractMaxillary sinus augmentation is the most predictable of the pre‐prosthetic surgical procedures. There are, however, known and well‐documented complications that can and do occur. The most common are the intraoperative complications of sinus membrane perforation and bleeding, and the postoperative complications of sinus graft infections, sinus infections, and sinusitis. The majority of these complications can be prevented, or their incidence greatly reduced, through a thorough understanding of maxillary sinus anatomy, the multifaceted etiologies of these conditions, and the steps that can be taken to avoid them. This volume of Periodontology 2000 will discuss both the preoperative and intraoperative procedures that will prevent these untoward outcomes and the necessary treatment modalities that will limit their adverse effects.
dc.publisherWright, Butterworth‐Heinemann Ltd
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.othercomplications
dc.subject.otherlateral approach
dc.subject.othersinus anatomy
dc.subject.othersinus lift
dc.titleRisk factors in lateral window sinus elevation surgery
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/151277/1/prd12286.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/151277/2/prd12286_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/prd.12286
dc.identifier.sourcePeriodontology 2000
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArdekian L, Oved‐Peleg E, Mactei EE, Peled M. The clinical significance of sinus membrane perforation during augmentation of the maxillary sinus. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006; 64: 277 ‐ 282.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHadar T, Shvero J, Nageris BI, Yaniv E. Mucus retention cyst of the maxillary sinus: the endoscopic approach. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 38: 227 ‐ 229.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTestori T, Mantovani M, Wallace SS, et al. Maxillary sinus elevation with simultaneous cyst deflation: a clinical prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2015. Manuscript in preparation.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLockhart R, Ceccaidi J, Bertrand JC. Postoperative maxillary cyst following sinus bone graft: report of a case. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000; 15: 583 ‐ 586.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMisch CM, Misch CE, Resnik RR, Ismael YH, Appel B. Post‐operative maxillary cyst associated with a maxillary sinus elevation procedure: a case report. J Oral Implantol. 1991; 17: 432 ‐ 437.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFelisati G, Lozza P, Chiapasco M, Borloni R. Endoscopic removal of an unusual foreign body in the sphenoid sinus: an oral implant. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Dec; 18: 776 ‐ 780.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAghaloo TL, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007; 22 ( Suppl ): 49 ‐ 70.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMisch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry, 3rd edn. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 2008: 905 ‐ 974.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarone A, Santini S, Sbordone L, Crespi R, Covani U. A clinical study of the outcomes and complications associated with maxillary sinus augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006; 21: 81 ‐ 85.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevin L, Herzberg R, Dolev E, Schwartz‐Arad D. Smoking and complications of onlay bone grafts and sinus lift operations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19: 369 ‐ 373.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParmar C, Meda KP. Achilles tendon rupture associated with combination therapy of levofloxacin and steroid in four patients and a review of the literature. Foot Ankle Int. 2007; 28: 1287 ‐ 1289.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStephenson AL, Wu W, Cortes D, Rochon PA. Tendon injury and fluoroquinolone use: a systematic review. drug saf. 2013; 36: 709 ‐ 721.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWagenberg B, Froum SJ. A retrospective of 1925 consecutively placed implants from 1988–2004. J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006; 21: 565 ‐ 578.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUrban I, Nagursky H, Church C, Lozada JL. Incidence, diagnosis, and treatment of sinus graft infection after sinus floor elevation: a clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012; 27: 449 ‐ 457.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhouly I, Phelan J, Munoz C, Froum SJ. Human histologic and radiographic evidence of bone formation in a previously infected maxillary sinus graft following debridement without re‐grafting; a case report. Int J Perio Restorative Dent. 2016; 36: 723 ‐ 729.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeleg M, Garg AK, Mazor Z. Predictability of simultaneous implant placement in the severely atrophic posterior maxilla: a 9‐year longitudinal experience study of 2132 implants placed into 731 human sinus grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006; 21: 94 ‐ 102.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTestori T, Drago L, Wallace SS, et al. Prevention and treatment of postoperative infections after maxillary sinus elevation surgery: clinical consensus and recommendations. Int J Dent. 2012; 2012: 365809.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTestori T, Mandelli F, Valentini P, Wallace S. A novel technique to prevent the loss of graft material through the antrostomy after sinus surgery: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29: e272 ‐ e274.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRegev E, Smith RA, Perrott DH, Pogrel MA. Maxillary sinus complications related to endosseous implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995; 10: 451 ‐ 461.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTepper G, Haas R, Schneider B, et al. Effects of sinus lifting on voice quality. A prospective study and risk assessment. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14: 767 ‐ 774.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWallace SS, Froum SJ. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol. 2003; 8: 328 ‐ 343.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35 ( Suppl 8 ): 216 ‐ 240.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDel Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, Weinstein R. Systematic review of survival for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004; 24: 565 ‐ 577.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDel Fabbro M, Wallace SS, Testori T. Long‐term implant survival in the grafted maxillary sinus: a systematic review. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013; 33: 773 ‐ 783.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Gowan DA, Baxter PW, James J. The maxillary sinus and its dental implications. Oxford,UK: Wright, Butterworth‐Heinemann Ltd; 1993.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCawood JI, Howell RA. A classification of the edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988; 17: 232 ‐ 236.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCawood JI, Howell RA. Reconstructive preprosthetic surgery. I. Anatomical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; 20: 75 ‐ 82.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarg AK. Augmentation grafting of the maxillary sinus for the placement of dental implants: anatomy, physiology, and proce‐ dure. Implant Dent. 1999; 8: 36 ‐ 46.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTimmenga NM, Raghoebar GM, Boering G, van Weissenbruch R. Maxillary sinus function after sinus lifts for the insertion of dental implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997; 55: 936 ‐ 939.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTatum H. Alabama Implant Congress, Birmingham, AL:1976.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg. 1980; 38: 613 ‐ 616.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWallace SS, Tarnow DP, Froum SJ, et al. Maxillary sinus elevation by lateral window approach: evolution of technology and technique. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2012; 12 ( Suppl 3 ): 161 ‐ 171.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaschieri S, Testori T, Corbella S, et al. Platelet‐Rich Plasma and Deproteinized Bovine Bone Matrix in Maxillary Sinus Lift Surgery: a Split‐Mouth Histomorphometric Evaluation. Implant Dent. 2015; 24: 592 ‐ 597.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStammberger H. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: the Messerklinger technique. Philadelphia, PA: BC Decker; 1991.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePommer B, Unger E, Sütö D, Hack N, Watzek G. Mechanical properties of the Schneiderian membrane in vitro. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2009; 20: 633 ‐ 637.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInsua A, Monje A, Chan HL, Zimmo N, Shaikh L, Wang HL. Accuracy of Schneiderian membrane thickness: a cone‐beam computed tomography analysis with histological validation. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2016; 28: 654 ‐ 661.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan den Bergh JP, ten Bruggenkate CM, Disch FJ, Tuinzing DB. Anatomical aspects of sinus floor elevations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000; 11: 256 ‐ 265.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUnderwood AS. An inquiry into the anatomy and pathology of the maxillary sinus. J Anat Physiol. 1910; 44: 354 ‐ 369.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrenmair G, Ulm CW, Lugmayr H. Maxillary sinus septa: incidence, morphology and clinical implications. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1997; 25: 261 ‐ 265.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim MJ, Jung UW, Kim CS, et al. Maxillary sinus septa: prevalence, height, location, and morphology. A reformatted computed tomography scan analysis. J Periodontol 2006; 77: 903 ‐ 908.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosano G, Taschieri S, Gaudy JF, Lesmes D, Del Fabbro M. Maxillary Sinus Septa: a Cadaveric Study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 68: 1360 ‐ 1364.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVelasquez‐Plata D, Hovey L, Peach CC, Alder ME. Maxillary sinus septa: a 3‐dimensional computerized tomographic scan analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17: 854 ‐ 860.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGaudy JF. Anatomie Clinique. Editions CdP Groupe Liaisons, 2003.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosano G, Taschieri S, Gaudy JF, Del Fabbro M. Maxillary sinus vascularization: a cadaveric study. J Craniofac Surg. 2009; 20: 940 ‐ 943.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSolar P, Geyerhofer U, Traxler H, Windisch A, Ulm C, Watzek G. Blood supply to the maxillary sinus relevant to sinus floor elevation procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999; 10: 34 ‐ 44.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTraxler H, Windisch A, Geyerhofer U, Surd R, Solar P, Firbas W. Arterial blood supply of the maxillary sinus. Clin Anat. 1999; 1: 417 ‐ 421.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElian N, Wallace S, Cho SC, Jalbout ZN, Froum S. Distribution of the maxillary artery as it relates to sinus floor augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 20: 784 ‐ 787.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMardinger O, Abba M, Hirshberg A, Schwartz‐Arad D. Prevalence, diameter and course of the maxillary intraosseous vascular canal with relation to sinus augmentation procedure: a radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 3: 735 ‐ 738.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTestori T, Rosano G, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M. Ligation of an unusually large vessel during maxillary sinus floor augmentation. A case report. Eur J Oral Implantol 2010; 3: 255 ‐ 258.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection. In: Branemark   PI, Zarb   GA, Albrektsson   T. Tissue Integrated Prosthesis. Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985: 199 ‐ 209.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTimmenga NM, Raghoebar GM, Liem RS, van Weissenbruch R, Manson WL, Vissink A. Effects of maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery on maxillary sinus physiology. Eur J Oral Sci. 2003; 111: 189 ‐ 197.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTorretta S, Mantovani M, Testori T, Cappadona M, Pignataro L. Importance of ENT assessment in stratifying candidates for sinus floor elevation: a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24 ( Suppl A100 ): 57 ‐ 62.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarmeli G, Artzi Z, Kozlovsky A, Segev Y, Landsberg R. Antral computerized tomography pre‐operative evaluation: relationship between mucosal thickening and maxillary sinus function. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2011; 22: 78 ‐ 82.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedland B, Metson R. A guide to recognizing maxillary sinus pathology and for deciding on further preoperative assessment prior to maxillary sinus augmentation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014; 34: 807 ‐ 815.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHernández‐Alfaro F, Torradeflot MM, Marti C. Prevalence and management of Schneiderian membrane perforations during sinus‐lift procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19: 91 ‐ 98.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSom M, Brandwein M. Sinonasal cavities: In ammatory diseases, tumors, fractures, and postoperative findings. In: Som PM, Curtin HD, eds. Head and Neck Imaging, 3rd edn. St. Louis: Mosby; 1996: 126 ‐ 315.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePignataro L, Mantovani M, Torretta S, Felisati G, Sambataro G. ENT assessment in the integrated management of candidate for (maxillary) sinus lift. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2008; 28: 110 ‐ 119.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMantovani M. Othorhinolayngolocical implications in augmentation of the maxillary sinus. In: Testori T, Del Fabbro M, Weinstein R, Wallace S. Maxillary sinus surgery. Chicago, IL: Quintessence; 2009
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLopatin AS, Sysolyatin SP, Sysolyatin PG, Melnikov MN. Chronic maxillary sinusitis of dental origin: is external surgical approach mandatory? Laryngoscope. 2002; 112: 1056 ‐ 1059.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMehra P, Murad H. Maxillary sinus disease of odontogenic origin. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2004; 37: 347 ‐ 364.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlbu S, Baciut M. Failures in endo‐ scopic surgery of the maxillary sinus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010; 142: 196 ‐ 201.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMelen I, Lindahl L, Andreasson L, Rundcrantz H. Chronic maxillary sinusitis. Definition, diagnosis and relation to dental infections and nasal polyposis. Acta Otolaryngol 1986; 101: 320 ‐ 327.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLonghini AB, Branstetter BF, Ferguson BJ. Otolaryngologists’ perceptions of odontogenic maxillary sinusitis. Laryngoscope. 2012; 122: 1910 ‐ 1914.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaibene AM, Vassena C, Pipolo C, et al. Odontogenic and rhinogenic chronic sinusitis: a modern microbiological comparison. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016; 6: 41 ‐ 45.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaschieri S, Torretta S, Corbella S, et al. Pathophysiology of sinusitis of odontogenic origin. J Investig Clin Dent 2015; 8: 1 ‐ 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAruni AW, Dou Y, Mishra A, Fletcher HM. The biofilm community‐rebels with a cause. Curr Oral Health Rep. 2015; 2: 48 ‐ 56.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSunde PT, Olsen I, Debelian GJ, Tronstad L. Microbiota of periapical lesions refractory to endodontic therapy. J Endod. 2002; 28: 304 ‐ 310.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHunsaker DH, Leid JG. The relationship of biofilms to chronic rhinosinusitis. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008; 16: 237 ‐ 241.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerloff JR, Palmer JN. Evidence of bacterial biofilms in a rabbit model of sinusitis. Am J Rhinol. 2005; 19: 1 ‐ 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerloff JR, Palmer JN. Evidence of bacterial biofilms on frontal recess stents in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Am J Rhinol. 2004; 18: 377 ‐ 380.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRamadan HH, Sanclement JA, Thomas JG. Chronic rhinosinusitis and biofilms. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005; 132: 414 ‐ 417.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanclement JA, Webster P, Thomas J, Ramadan HH. Bacterial biofilms in surgical specimens of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope. 2005; 115: 578 ‐ 582.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceForeman A, Psaltis AJ, Tan LW, Wormald PJ. Characterization of bacterial and fungal biofilms in chronic rhinos‐ inusitis. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009; 23: 556 ‐ 561.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHealy DY, Leid JG, Sanderson AR, Hunsaker DH. Biofilms with fungi in chronic rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008; 138: 641 ‐ 647.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChole RA, Faddis BT. Anatomical evidence of microbial biofilms in tonsillar tissue: a possible mechanism to explain chronicity. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003; 129: 634 ‐ 636.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTroeltzsch M, Pache C, Troeltzsch M, et al. Etiology and clinical characteristics of symptomatic unilateral maxillary sinusitis: a review of 174 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015; 43: 1522 ‐ 1529.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlanksma CJ, Brand HS. Cocaine abuse: orofacial manifestations and implications for dental treatment. Int Dent J. 2005; 55: 365 ‐ 369.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSilvestre FJ, Perez‐Herbera A, Puente‐Sandoval A, Bagán JV. Hard palate perforation in cocaine abusers: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2010; 14: 621 ‐ 628.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeitz‐Mayfield LJ, Huynh‐Ba G. History of treated periodontitis and smoking as risks for implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24 ( Suppl ): 39 ‐ 68.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTestori T, Weinstein RL, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M. Risk factor analysis following maxillary sinus augmentation: a retrospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012; 27: 1170 ‐ 1176.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFlanagan D. Arterial supply of maxillary sinus and potential for bleeding complication during lateral approach sinus elevation. Implant Dent. 2005; 14: 336 ‐ 338.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVercellotti T, De Paoli S, Nevins M. The piezoelectric bony window osteotomy and sinus membrane elevation: introduction of a new technique for simplification of the sinus augmentation procedure. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001; 21: 561 ‐ 567.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeziat JL, Vercellotti T, Gleizal A. What is Piezosurgery? Two‐years’ experience in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 2007; 108: 101 ‐ 107.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeha HJ, Gleizal AM, Beziat JL. Sensitivity of the inferior lip and chin following mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy using Piezosurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 118: 598 ‐ 607.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAtieh MA, Alsa Beeha NH, Tawse‐Smith A, Faggion CM Jr, Duncan WJ. Piezoelectric surgery vs rotary instruments for lateral maxillary sinus floor elevation: a systematic review of and meta‐ analysis of intra‐ and postoperative complications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015; 30: 1262 ‐ 1271.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZijderveld SA, van den Bergh JPA, Schulten EAJM, ten Bruggenkate CM. Anatomical and surgical findings and complications in 100 consecutive maxillary sinus floor elevations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 66: 1426 ‐ 1438.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwartz‐Arad D, Herzberg R, Dolev E. The prevalence of surgical complications of the sinus graft procedure and their impact on implant survival. J Periodontol. 2004; 75: 511 ‐ 516.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKasabah S, Krug J, Simunek A, Lecaro MC. Can we predict maxillary sinus mucosa perforation? Acta Med. 2003; 46: 19 ‐ 23.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCho S‐C, Wallace SS, Froum SJ, Tarnow DP. Influence of anatomy on Schneiderian membrane perforations during sinus elevation surgery: three‐dimensional analysis. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2001; 13: 160 ‐ 163.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChan HL, Monje A, Suarez F, Benavides E, Wang HL. Palatonasal recess on medial wall of the maxillary sinus and clinical implications for sinus augmentation via lateral window approach. J Periodontol. 2013; 84: 1087 ‐ 1093.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAvila‐Ortiz G, Wang HL, Galindo‐Moreno P, Misch CE, Rudek I, Neiva R. Influence of lateral window dimensions on vital bone formation following maxillary sinus augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012; 27: 1230 ‐ 1238.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWallace SS, Mazor Z, Froum SJ, Cho SC, Tarnow DP. Schneiderian membrane perforation rate during sinus elevation using Piezosurgery: clinical results of 100 consecutive cases. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007; 27: 413 ‐ 419.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlus C, Szmukler‐Moncler S, Salama M, Salama H, Garber D. Sinus bone grafting procedures using ultrasonic bone surgery: 5‐year experience. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008; 28: 221 ‐ 229.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceToscano NJ, Holtzclaw D, Rosen PS. The effect of piezoelectric use on open sinus lift perforation: a retrospective evaluation of 56 consecutively treated cases from private practices. J Periodontol. 2010; 81: 167 ‐ 171.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarone A, Santini S, Marconcini S, Giacomelli L, Gherlone E, Covani U. Osteotomy and membrane elevation during the maxillary sinus augmentation procedure. A comparative study: piezoelectric device vs. conventional rotary instruments. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 511 ‐ 515.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLozada JL, Goodacre C, Al‐Ardah AJ, Garbacea A. Lateral and crestal bone planing antrostomy: a simplified surgical procedure to reduce the incidence of membrane perforation during maxillary sinus augmentation procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2011; 105: 147 ‐ 153.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNishimoto N, Kan J, Lozada JL, Wallace SS, Rungcharassaeng KR. Incidence of maxillary sinus membrane perforation during lateral window approach using the DASK technique (lateral bone‐planing antrostomy). Manuscript in preparation
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeller EE, Eckert SE, Tolman DE. Maxillary antral and nasal one‐stage inlay composite bone graft. Preliminary report on 30 recipient sites. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994; 52: 438 ‐ 447.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTriplett RG, Schow SR. Autologous bone grafts and endosseous implants: complementary techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996; 54: 486 ‐ 494.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceProussaefs P, Lozada J, Kim J, Rohrer MD. Repair of the perforated sinus membrane with a resorbable collagen membrane: a human study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19: 413 ‐ 420.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFugazzotto PA, Vlassis JM. A simplified classification and repair system for sinus membrane perforations. J Periodontol. 2003; 74: 1534 ‐ 1541.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePikos MA. Maxillary sinus repair: report of a technique for large perforations. Implant Dent. 1999; 8: 29 ‐ 33.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceProussaefs A, Lozada J. The, “Loma Linda pouch”: a technique for repairing the perforated sinus membrane. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003; 23: 593 ‐ 597.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShlomi B, Horowitz I, Kahn A, Dodriyan A, Chaushu G. The effect of sinus membrane perforation and repair with Lambone sheet on the outcome of maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a radiographic assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19: 559 ‐ 562.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTestori T, Wallace SS, Del Fabbro M, et al. Repair of large sinus membrane perforations using stabilized collagen barrier membranes: surgical techniques with histologic, and radiographic evidence of success. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008; 28: 9 ‐ 17.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVlassis JM, Fugazzotto PA. A classification system for sinus membrane perforations during augmentation procedures with options for repair. J Periodontol. 1999; 70: 692 ‐ 699.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaas R, Baron M, Donath K, Zechner W, Watzek G. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17: 337 ‐ 346.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHürzeler MB, Quiñones CR, Kirsch A, Gloker C, Schüpbach P, Strub JR. Maxillary sinus augmentation using different grafting materials and dental implants in monkeys. Part 1. Evaluation of anorganic bovine bone‐derived bone matrix. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8: 476 ‐ 486.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJensen OT, Shulman LB, Block MS, Iacono VJ. Report of the Sinus Consensus Conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998; 13 ( Suppl ): 11 ‐ 45.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhoury F. Augmentation of the sinus floor with mandibular bone block and simultaneous implantation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999; 14: 557 ‐ 564.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarabuda C, Arisan V, Hakan O. Effects of sinus membrane perforation on the success of dental implants placed in the augmented sinus. J Periodontol. 2006; 77: 991 ‐ 997.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFroum SJ, Khouly I, Favero G, Cho SC. Effect of maxillary sinus membrane perforation on vital bone formation and implant survival: a retrospective study. J Periodontol. 2013; 84: 1094 ‐ 1099.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDohan Ehrenfest DM, Rasmusson L, Albrektsson T. Classification of platelet concentrates: from pure platelet‐rich plasma (P‐PRP) to leucocyte‐ and platelet‐rich fibrin (L‐PRF). Trends Biotechnol. 2009; 27: 158 ‐ 167.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDohan Ehrenfest DM. How to optimize the preparation of leukocyte‐ and platelet‐rich fibrin (L‐PRF, Choukroun’s technique) clots and membranes: introducing the PRF Box. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010; 110: 275 ‐ 278.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimonpieri A, Choukroun J, Del Corso M, Sammartino G, Dohan Ehrenfest DM. Simultaneous sinus‐lift and implantation using microthreaded implants and leukocyte‐ and platelet‐rich fibrin as sole grafting material: a six‐year experience. Implant Dent. 2011; 20: 2 ‐ 12.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaestre‐Ferrín L, Galán‐Gil S, Carrillo‐García C, Peñarrocha‐Diago M. Radiographic findings in the maxillary sinus: comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011; 26: 341 ‐ 346.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
prd12286.pdf
Size:
378.8MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
prd12286_am.pdf
Size:
4.604MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.