View Item 

Show simple item record

Translation and Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Perceived Workplace Environment Scale in Taiwanese Information Technology Professionals
dc.contributor.authorLin, Yun‐ping
dc.contributor.authorKao, Tsui‐sui Annie
dc.contributor.authorMccullagh, Marjorie C.
dc.contributor.authorEdington, Dee W.
dc.contributor.authorLarson, Janet L.
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-30T15:31:11Z
dc.date.available2019-09-30T15:31:11Z
dc.date.issued2012-05
dc.identifier.citationLin, Yun‐ping ; Kao, Tsui‐sui Annie ; Mccullagh, Marjorie C.; Edington, Dee W.; Larson, Janet L. (2012). "Translation and Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Perceived Workplace Environment Scale in Taiwanese Information Technology Professionals." Journal of Occupational Health 54(3): 223-231.
dc.identifier.issn1348-9585
dc.identifier.issn1348-9585
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/151298
dc.publisherJossey-Bass
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherPerceived Workplace Environment Scale
dc.subject.otherPhysical activity
dc.subject.otherInstrument translation
dc.subject.otherInformation technology professionals
dc.subject.otherPsychometric properties
dc.titleTranslation and Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Perceived Workplace Environment Scale in Taiwanese Information Technology Professionals
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/151298/1/joh2054003008.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1539/joh.11-0225-OA
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Occupational Health
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2003.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBehling O, Law KS. Translating questionnaires and other research instruments: problems and solutions. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2000.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeisinger KF. Cross-cultural normative assessment: translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments. Psychol Assess 1994; 6: 304 - 12.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarkness J, Pennell BE, Schoua-Glusberg A. Survey questionnaire translation and assessment. In: Presser S, Rothgeb JM, Couper MP, et al., editors. Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2004. p. 453 - 73.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFlaherty JA, Gaviria FM, Pathak D, et al. Developing instruments for cross-cultural psychiatric research. J Nerv Ment Dis 1988; 176: 257 - 63.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartinez G, Marín BV, Schoua-Glusberg A. Translating from English to Spanish: the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Hisp J Behav Sci 2006; 28: 531 - 45.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res 1986; 35: 382 - 5.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePolit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health 2006; 29: 489 - 97.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarlson ED. A case study in translation methodology using the Health-Promotion Lifestyle Profile II. Public Health Nurs 2000; 17: 61 - 70.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang WL, Lee HL, Fetzer SJ. Challenges and strategies of instrument translation. West J Nurs Res 2006; 28: 310 - 21.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaiwan Bureau of Health Promotion, Department of Health. Taiwan Version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire: Long Form. [Online]. 2007 [cited 2009 Jun 20]; Available from: URL: http://www.bhp.doh.gov.tw/BHPnet/Portal/Them_Show.aspx?Subject=200712250028&Class=2&No=200903250002 (in Chinese)
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCraig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 1381 - 95.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiou YM. Development and verification of validity and reliability of the Taiwan version of International Physical Activity Questionnaires. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Taipei: National Taiwan University; 2004 (in Chinese).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIPAQ Research Committee. Guidelines for Data Processing and Analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)-Short and Long Forms. [Online]. 2005 [cited 2009 Jun 20]; Available from: URL: http://www.ipaq.ki.se/scoring.pdf
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBentler PM. EQS 6 Structural Equations Program Manual. Encino (CA): Multivariate Software; 2006.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinney SJ, DiStefano C. Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In: Hancock GR, Mueller RO, editors. Structural equation modeling: a second course. Greenwich (CT): Information Age Publishing; 2006. p. 269 - 314.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHu L-T, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 1999; 6: 1 - 55.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYu C-Y, Muthén B. Evaluation of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, April 4, 2002, New Orleans.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSatorra A, Bentler PM. A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for the moment structure analysis. Psychometrika 2001; 66: 507 - 14.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press; 2005.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTomas JM, Oliver A. Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale: two factors or method effects. Struct Equ Modeling 1999; 6: 84 - 98.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGolaszewski T, Allen J, Edington D. Working together to create supportive environments in worksite health promotion. Am J Health Promot 2008; 22: 1 - 10.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePronk NP. Physical activity promotion in business and industry: evidence, context, and recommendations for a national plan. J Phys Act Health 2009; 6 ( Suppl 2 ): S220- - 35.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePronk NP, Kottke TE. Physical activity promotion as a strategic corporate priority to improve worker health and business performance. Prev Med 2009; 49: 316 - 21.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceProdaniuk TR, Plotnikoff RC, Spence JC, Wilson PM. The influence of self-efficacy and outcome expectations on the relationship between perceived environment and physical activity in the workplace. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2004; 1: 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlunt GH, Hallam JS. The worksite supportive environments for active living survey: development and psychometric properties. Am J Health Promot 2010; 25: 48 - 57.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGolaszewski T, Fisher B. Heart check: the development and evolution of an organizational heart health assessment. Am J Health Promot 2002; 17: 132 - 53.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOldenburg B, Sallis JF, Harris D, Owen N. Checklist of Health Promotion Environments at Worksites (CHEW): development and measurement characteristics. Am J Health Promot 2002; 16: 288 - 99.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParker KB, DeJoy DM, Wilson MG, Bowen HM, Goetzel RZ. Application of the Environmental Assessment Tool (EAT) as a process measure for a worksite weight management intervention. J Occup Environ Med 2010; 52 ( Suppl 1 ): S42- - 51.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeresford SA, Bishop SK, Brunner NL, et al. Environmental assessment at worksites after a multilevel intervention to promote activity and changes in eating: the PACE project. J Occup Environ Med 2010; 52 ( Suppl 1 ): S22- - 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePlotnikoff RC, Prodaniuk TR, Fein AJ, Milton L. Development of an ecological assessment tool for a workplace physical activity program standard. Health Promot Pract 2005; 6: 453 - 63.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Quart 1988; 15: 351 - 77.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSallis JF, Owen N. Ecological models of health behavior. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002. p. 462 - 84.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
joh2054003008.pdf
Size:
232.5KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.