Abstract
dc.contributor.author | Lane, Giulia I. | |
dc.contributor.author | Roberts, William W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mann, Rachel | |
dc.contributor.author | O’Dell, Diana | |
dc.contributor.author | Stoffel, John T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Clemens, J. Quentin | |
dc.contributor.author | Cameron, Anne P. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-09-30T15:31:36Z | |
dc.date.available | WITHHELD_13_MONTHS | |
dc.date.available | 2019-09-30T15:31:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-09 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Lane, Giulia I.; Roberts, William W.; Mann, Rachel; O’Dell, Diana; Stoffel, John T.; Clemens, J. Quentin; Cameron, Anne P. (2019). "Abstract." Neurourology and Urodynamics 38(7): 1901-1906. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0733-2467 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1520-6777 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/151315 | |
dc.description.abstract | AimsPatients with spinal cord injury (SCI) are at risk of developing renal calculi. This study describes the management of renal calculi among patients with SCI with attention to factors influencing surgical management vs observation.MethodsThis retrospective, cohort study identified patients with SCI and renal calculi between 2009 to 2016 from an institutional neurogenic bladder database and detailed the management of their stones. A stone episode was defined as radiographic evidence of new calculi.ResultsOf 205 patients with SCI, 34 had renal stones, for a prevalence of 17%. The mean age was 50 years (range 22,77) and most had cervical SCI (n = 22, 65%). There were 41 stone episodes with 98 individual stones identified with a mean stone size of 4.9 mm (range 1‐19).Of the 41 episodes, 10 (24%) underwent surgery after initial diagnosis. Pain was the most common primary indication for surgery (n = 9, 60%). The median time from diagnosis to intervention for all patients was 4 months (interquartile range 1,23). Of the 41 episodes, 31 (76%) were initially observed and among these, 5 ultimately required surgery (16%) while 26 (84%) did not. Of these 26, 12 (46%) stones passed spontaneously and 14 (53%) remained unchanged. The need for surgery correlated with more stone episodes (P = .049).ConclusionIn this cohort of patients with SCI and small, nonobstructing renal stones, 76% (n = 31) were offered observation. Of these observed patients, 84% (n = 26) did not require further intervention at a median of 4 years of follow‐up. | |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | |
dc.subject.other | neurogenic bladder | |
dc.subject.other | spinal cord injury | |
dc.subject.other | stones | |
dc.subject.other | urolithiasis | |
dc.subject.other | endourology | |
dc.title | Abstract | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Internal Medicine and Specialties | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/151315/1/nau24091.pdf | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/151315/2/nau24091_am.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/nau.24091 | |
dc.identifier.source | Neurourology and Urodynamics | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ramsey S, McIlhenny C. Evidence‐based management of upper tract urolithiasis in the spinal cord‐injured patient. Spinal Cord. 2011; 49 ( 9 ): 948 ‐ 954. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Creevy CD. The management of neurogenic vesical dysfunction. Am Pract Dig Treat. 1948; 3 ( 2 ): 71 ‐ 74. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Savic G, DeVivo MJ, Frankel HL, Jamous MA, Soni BM, Charlifue S. Causes of death after traumatic spinal cord injury‐a 70‐year British study. Spinal Cord. 2017; 55 ( 10 ): 891 ‐ 897. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lane GI, Elliott SP. Safely avoiding surgery in adult neurogenic bladder. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2018; 13 ( 3 ): 169 ‐ 177. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Shavelle RM, DeVivo MJ, Brooks JC, Strauss DJ, Paculdo DR. Improvements in long‐term survival after spinal cord injury? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96 ( 4 ): 645 ‐ 651. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Morhardt DR, Hadj‐Moussa M, Chang H, et al. Outcomes of ureteroscopic stone treatment in patients with spinal cord injury. Urology. 2018; 116: 41 ‐ 46. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Welk B, Fuller A, Razvi H, Denstedt J. Renal stone disease in spinal‐cord‐injured patients. J Endourol. 2012; 26 ( 8 ): 954 ‐ 959. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Welk B, Shariff S, Ordon M, Catharine Craven B, Herschorn S, Garg AX. The surgical management of upper tract stone disease among spinal cord‐injured patients. Spinal Cord. 2013; 51 ( 6 ): 457 ‐ 460. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Professionals S‐O. Neuro‐urology | Uroweb [Internet]. Uroweb. [cited 2019 Mar 9]. Available from: https://uroweb.org/guideline/neuro‐urology/ | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Bladder management for adults with spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for health‐care providers. J Spinal Cord Med. 2006; 29 ( 5 ): 527 ‐ 573. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Professionals S‐O. EAU Guidelines: Urolithiasis | Uroweb [Internet]. Uroweb. [cited 2019 Jun 12]. Available from: https://uroweb.org/guideline/urolithiasis/#3_4_10 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kidney Stones: Surgical Management Guideline ‐ American Urological Association [Internet]. [cited 2019 Jun 12]. Available from: https://www.auanet.org/guidelines/kidney‐stones‐surgical‐management‐guideline | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Baldea KG, Blackwell RH, Vedachalam S, et al. Outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in spinal cord injury patients as compared to a matched cohort. Urolithiasis. 2017; 45 ( 5 ): 501 ‐ 506. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Clifton MM, Gettman MT, Patterson DE, Rangel L, Krambeck AE. The change in upper tract urolithiasis composition, surgical treatments and outcomes of para and quadriplegic patients over time. Urolithiasis. 2014; 42 ( 5 ): 415 ‐ 419. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wolfe T, Klausner AP, Goetz LL, King AB, Hudson T, Gater DR. Ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy for urolithiasis in the spinal cord injury population. Spinal Cord. 2013; 51 ( 2 ): 156 ‐ 160. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Chen Y, DeVivo MJ, Stover SL, Lloyd LK. Recurrent kidney stone: a 25‐year follow‐up study in persons with spinal cord injury. Urology. 2002; 60 ( 2 ): 228 ‐ 232. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wang H‐HS, Wiener JS, Ferrandino MN, Lipkin ME, Routh JC. Complications of surgical management of upper tract calculi in spina bifida patients: analysis of nationwide data. J Urol. 2015; 193 ( 4 ): 1270 ‐ 1274. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dropkin BM, Moses RA, Sharma D, Pais VM Jr. The natural history of nonobstructing asymptomatic renal stones managed with active surveillance. J Urol. 2015; 193 ( 4 ): 1265 ‐ 1269. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sener NC, Bas O, Sener E, et al. Asymptomatic lower pole small renal stones: shock wave lithotripsy, flexible ureteroscopy, or observation? A prospective randomized trial [Internet]. Urology. 2015; 85: 33 ‐ 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.023 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bølling Hansen R, Biering‐Sørensen F, Kvist Kristensen J. Urinary calculi following traumatic spinal cord injury. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2007; 41 ( 2 ): 115 ‐ 119. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Chen Y, DeVivo MJ, Roseman JM. Current trend and risk factors for kidney stones in persons with spinal cord injury: a longitudinal study. Spinal Cord. 2000; 38 ( 6 ): 346 ‐ 353. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ciaschini MW, Remer EM, Baker ME, Lieber M, Herts BR. Urinary calculi: radiation dose reduction of 50% and 75% at CT—effect on sensitivity. Radiology. 2009; 251 ( 1 ): 105 ‐ 111. | |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.