Show simple item record

Surgical informed consent in obstetric and gynecologic surgeries: experience from a comprehensive teaching hospital in Southern Ethiopia

dc.contributor.authorTeshome, Million
dc.contributor.authorWolde, Zeneb
dc.contributor.authorGedefaw, Abel
dc.contributor.authorTariku, Mequanent
dc.contributor.authorAsefa, Anteneh
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-28T20:10:29Z
dc.date.available2019-10-28T20:10:29Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-24
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/151799
dc.description.abstractBackground Surgical Informed Consent (SIC) has long been recognized as an important component of modern medicine. The ultimate goals of SIC are to improve clients’ understanding of the intended procedure, increase client satisfaction, maintain trust between clients and health providers, and ultimately minimize litigation issues related to surgical procedures. The purpose of the current study is to assess the comprehensiveness of the SIC process for women undergoing obstetric and gynecologic surgeries. Methods A hospital-based cross-sectional study was undertaken at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (HUCSH) in November and December, 2016. A total of 230 women who underwent obstetric and/or gynecologic surgeries were interviewed immediately after their hospital discharge to assess their experience of the SIC process. Thirteen components of SIC were used based on international recommendations, including the Royal College of Surgeon’s standards of informed consent practices for surgical procedures. Descriptive summaries are presented in tables and figures. Results Forty percent of respondents were aged between 25 and 29 years. Nearly a quarter (22.6%) had no formal education. More than half (54.3%) of respondents had undergone an emergency surgical procedure. Only 18.4% of respondents reported that the surgeon performing the operation had offered SIC, while 36.6% of respondents could not recall who had offered SIC. All except one respondent provided written consent to undergo a surgical procedure. However, 8.3% of respondents received SIC service while already on the operation table for their procedure. Only 73.9% of respondents were informed about the availability (or lack thereof) of alternative treatment options. Additionally, a majority of respondents were not informed about the type of anesthesia to be used (88.3%) and related complications (87.4%). Only 54.2% of respondents reported that they had been offered at least six of the 13 SIC components used by the investigators. Conclusions There is gap in the provision of comprehensive and standardized pre-operative counseling for obstetric and gynecologic surgeries in the study hospital. This has a detrimental effect on the overall quality of care clients receive, specifically in terms of client expectations and information needs.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectSurgical informed consenten_US
dc.subjectObstetrics and gynecologyen_US
dc.subjectClientsen_US
dc.subjectCounselingen_US
dc.titleSurgical informed consent in obstetric and gynecologic surgeries: experience from a comprehensive teaching hospital in Southern Ethiopiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelObstetrics and Gynecology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Ethiopiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSchool of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Ethiopiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/151799/1/Teshome et al_BMCEthics_2018.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0293-2
dc.identifier.sourceBMC Medical Ethicsen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5541-0088en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4470-1848en_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of Teshome et al_BMCEthics_2018.pdf : Main article
dc.identifier.name-orcidGedefaw, Abel; 0000-0002-5541-0088en_US
dc.identifier.name-orcidAsefa, Anteneh; 0000-0003-4470-1848en_US
dc.owningcollnameInternational Reproductive Health Training, Center for (UM-CIRHT)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.