View Item 

Show simple item record

Classification of facial periâ implant soft tissue dehiscence/deficiencies at single implant sites in the esthetic zone
dc.contributor.authorZucchelli, Giovanni
dc.contributor.authorTavelli, Lorenzo
dc.contributor.authorStefanini, Martina
dc.contributor.authorBarootchi, Shayan
dc.contributor.authorMazzotti, Claudio
dc.contributor.authorGori, Guido
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom‐lay
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-30T15:31:32Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHS
dc.date.available2019-10-30T15:31:32Z
dc.date.issued2019-10
dc.identifier.citationZucchelli, Giovanni; Tavelli, Lorenzo; Stefanini, Martina; Barootchi, Shayan; Mazzotti, Claudio; Gori, Guido; Wang, Hom‐lay (2019). "Classification of facial periâ implant soft tissue dehiscence/deficiencies at single implant sites in the esthetic zone." Journal of Periodontology 90(10): 1116-1124.
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492
dc.identifier.issn1943-3670
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/151905
dc.description.abstractBackgroundThe incidence of a periâ implant soft tissue dehiscence/deficiency (PSTD) is not a rare finding. Despite multiple previous attempts aimed at correcting the PSTDs, a classification of these conditions has not yet been proposed. This lack in the literature may also lead to discrepancies in the reported treatment outcomes and thus misinform the clinician or the readers. The aim of the present article was therefore to present a classification of periâ implant PSTD at a single implant site.MethodsFour classes of PSTDs were discussed based on the position of the gingival margin of the implantâ supported crown in relation to the homologous natural tooth. In addition, the buccoâ lingual position of the implant head was also taken into consideration. Each class was further subdivided based on the height of the anatomical papillae.ResultsSubsequently, for each respective category a surgical approach (including bilaminar techniques, the combined prostheticâ surgical approach or soft tissue augmentation with a submerged healing) was also suggested.ConclusionThis paper provides a new classification system for describing PSTDs at single implant sites, with the appropriate recommended treatment protocol.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherbuccal mucosa
dc.subject.otherclassification
dc.subject.otherconnective tissue
dc.subject.otherdental implant
dc.subject.otheresthetics
dc.subject.otherimplantâ supported dental prosthesis
dc.titleClassification of facial periâ implant soft tissue dehiscence/deficiencies at single implant sites in the esthetic zone
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/151905/1/jper10351_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/151905/2/jper10351.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/JPER.18-0616
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Periodontology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG, et al. Periâ implant diseases and conditions: consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the classification of periodontal and periâ implant diseases and conditions. J Clin Periodontol. 2018; 45 Suppl 20: S286 â S291.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuser D, Chappuis V, Belser UC, Chen S. Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: when immediate, when early, when late. Periodontol 2000. 2017; 73: 84 â 102.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEvans CD, Chen ST. Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19: 73 â 80.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCosyn J, Sabzevar MM, De Bruyn H. Predictors of interâ proximal and midfacial recession following single implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: a multivariate analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2012; 39: 895 â 903.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCosyn J, Hooghe N, De Bruyn H. A systematic review on the frequency of advanced recession following single immediate implant treatment. J Clin Periodontol. 2012; 39: 582 â 589.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFu JH, Su CY, Wang HL. Esthetic soft tissue management for teeth and implants. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2012; 12: 129 â 142.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSculean A, Gruber R, Bosshardt DD. Soft tissue wound healing around teeth and dental implants. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 41 Suppl 15: S6 â 22.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSculean A, Chappuis V, Cosgarea R. Coverage of mucosal recessions at dental implants. Periodontol 2000. 2017; 73: 134 â 140.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurkhardt R, Joss A, Lang NP. Soft tissue dehiscence coverage around endosseous implants: a prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19: 451 â 457.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHappe A, Stimmelmayr M, Schlee M, Rothamel D. Surgical management of periâ implant soft tissue color mismatch caused by shineâ through effects of restorative materials: oneâ year followâ up. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013; 33: 81 â 88.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee CT, Hamalian T, Schulzeâ Spate U. Minimally invasive treatment of soft tissue deficiency around an implantâ supported restoration in the esthetic zone: modified VISTA technique case report. J Oral Implantol. 2015; 41: 71 â 76.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFickl S. Periâ implant mucosal recession: clinical significance and therapeutic opportunities. Quintessence Int. 2015; 46: 671 â 676.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLe B, Borzabadiâ Farahani A, Nielsen B. Treatment of labial soft tissue recession around dental implants in the esthetic zone using guided bone regeneration with mineralized allograft: a retrospective clinical case series. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 74: 1552 â 1561.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLai YL, Chen HL, Chang LY, Lee SY. Resubmergence technique for the management of soft tissue recession around an implant: case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac. 2010; 25: 201 â 204.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChu SJ, Tarnow DP. Managing esthetic challenges with anterior implants. Part 1: midfacial recession defects from etiology to resolution. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013; 34 Spec No 7: 26 â 31.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZucchelli G, Mazzotti C, Mounssif I, Mele M, Stefanini M, Montebugnoli L. A novel surgicalâ prosthetic approach for soft tissue dehiscence coverage around single implant. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24: 957 â 962.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceButler B, Kinzer GA. Managing esthetic implant complications. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2012; 33: 514 â 518.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCairo F, Nieri M, Pagliaro U. Efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gingival recessions. A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 41 Suppl 15: S44 â 62.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTavelli L, Barootchi S, Nguyen TV, Tattan M, Ravida A, Wang HL. Efficacy of tunnel technique in the treatment of localized and multiple gingival recessions: a systematic review and a metaâ analysis. J Periodontol. 2018; 89 ( 9 ): 1075 â 1090.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDecker AM, Suarezâ Lopez Del Amo F, Urban IA, Miller PD, Jr, Wang HL. Prognostic classification system for implant recession defects. Implant Dent. 2017; 26: 848 â 852.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDierens M, de Bruecker E, Vandeweghe S, Kisch J, de Bruyn H, Cosyn J. Alterations in soft tissue levels and aesthetics over a 16â 22 year period following single implant treatment in periodontallyâ healthy patients: a retrospective case series. J Clin Periodontol. 2013; 40: 311 â 318.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJung RE, Sailer I, Hammerle CH, Attin T, Schmidlin P. In vitro color changes of soft tissues caused by restorative materials. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007; 27: 251 â 257.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Brakel R, Noordmans HJ, Frenken J, de Roode R, de Wit GC, Cune MS. The effect of zirconia and titanium implant abutments on light reflection of the supporting soft tissues. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22: 1172 â 1178.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZucchelli G, Felice P, Mazzotti C, et al. 5â year outcomes after coverage of soft tissue dehiscence around single implants: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018; 11: 215 â 224.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchallhorn RA, McClain PK, Charles A, Clem D, Newman MG. Evaluation of a porcine collagen matrix used to augment keratinized tissue and increase soft tissue thickness around existing dental implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2015; 35: 99 â 103.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZucchelli G, Mazzotti C, Mounssif I, Marzadori M, Stefanini M. Esthetic treatment of periâ implant soft tissue defects: a case report of a modified surgicalâ prosthetic approach. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013; 33: 327 â 335.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZucchelli G, Mazzotti C, Bentivogli V, Mounssif I, Marzadori M, Monaco C. The connective tissue platform technique for soft tissue augmentation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012; 32: 665 â 675.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller PD, Jr. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1985; 5 ( 2 ): 8 â 13.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCairo F, Nieri M, Cincinelli S, Mervelt J, Pagliaro U. The interproximal clinical attachment level to classify gingival recessions and predict root coverage outcomes: an explorative and reliability study. J Clin Periodontol. 2011; 38: 661 â 666.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson LE, Inglehart MR, Elâ Kholy K, Eber R, Wang HL. Implant associated soft tissue defects in the anterior maxilla: a randomized control trial comparing subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix allograft. Implant Dent. 2014; 23: 416 â 425.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDierens M, Vandeweghe S, Kisch J, Nilner K, De Bruyn H. Longâ term followâ up of turned single implants placed in periodontally healthy patients after 16â 22 years: radiographic and periâ implant outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23: 197 â 204.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQuirynen M, Herrera D, Teughels W, Sanz M. Implant therapy: 40 years of experience. Periodontol 2000. 2014; 66: 7 â 12.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Bruyn H, Raes S, Matthys C, Cosyn J. The current use of patientâ centered/reported outcomes in implant dentistry: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26 Suppl 11: 45 â 56.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuser D, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontol 2000. 2017; 73: 7 â 21.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoccuzzo M, Gaudioso L, Bunino M, Dalmasso P. Surgical treatment of buccal soft tissue recessions around single implants: 1â year results from a prospective pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25: 641 â 646.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMazzotti C, Stefanini M, Felice P, Bentivogli V, Mounssif I, Zucchelli G. Softâ tissue dehiscence coverage at periâ implant sites. Periodontol 2000. 2018; 77: 256 â 272.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBengazi F, Wennstrom JL, Lekholm U. Recession of the soft tissue margin at oral implants. A 2â year longitudinal prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996; 7: 303 â 310.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmall PN, Tarnow DP, Cho SC. Gingival recession around wideâ diameter versus standardâ diameter implants: a 3â to 5â year longitudinal prospective study. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2001; 13: 143 â 146.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin GH, Chan HL, Wang HL. The significance of keratinized mucosa on implant health: a systematic review. J Periodontol. 2013; 84: 1755 â 1767.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen ST, Buser D. Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxillaâ a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29 Suppl: 186 â 215.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCosyn J, Eghbali A, Hermans A, Vervaeke S, De Bruyn H, Cleymaet R. A 5â year prospective study on single immediate implants in the aesthetic zone. J Clin Periodontol. 2016; 43: 702 â 709.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jper10351_am.pdf
Size:
1.504MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
jper10351.pdf
Size:
1.526MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.