Characteristics of the transverse 2D uniserial arrangement of rows of decussating enamel rods in the inner enamel layer of mouse mandibular incisors
dc.contributor.author | Smith, Charles E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hu, Yuanyuan | |
dc.contributor.author | Hu, Jan C‐c. | |
dc.contributor.author | Simmer, James P. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-12T16:21:04Z | |
dc.date.available | WITHHELD_13_MONTHS | |
dc.date.available | 2019-11-12T16:21:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-11 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Smith, Charles E.; Hu, Yuanyuan; Hu, Jan C‐c. ; Simmer, James P. (2019). "Characteristics of the transverse 2D uniserial arrangement of rows of decussating enamel rods in the inner enamel layer of mouse mandibular incisors." Journal of Anatomy 235(5): 912-930. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0021-8782 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1469-7580 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/151964 | |
dc.description.abstract | The 2D arrangement of rows of enamel rods with alternating (decussating) tilt angles across the thickness of the inner layer in rat and mouse incisor enamel is well known and assumed to occur in a uniform and repetitive pattern. Some irregularities in the arrangement of rows have been reported, but no detailed investigation of row structure across the entire inner enamel layer currently exists. This investigation was undertaken to determine if the global row pattern in mouse mandibular incisor enamel is predominately regular in nature with only occasional anomalies or if rows of enamel rods have more spatial complexity than previously suspected. The data from this investigation indicate that rows of enamel rods are highly variable in length and have complex transverse arrangements across the width and thickness of the inner enamel layer. The majority of rows are short or medium in length, with 87% having <Â 100 rods per row. The remaining 13% are long rows (with 100-233 rods per row) that contain 46% of all enamel rods seen in transverse sections. Variable numbers of rows were associated with the lateral, central and mesial regions of the enamel layer. Each region contained different ratios of short, medium and long rows. A variety of relationships was found along the transverse length of rows in each region, including uniform associations of alternating rod tilts between neighboring rows, and instances where two rows having the same rod tilt were paired for variable distances then moved apart to accommodate rows of opposite tilt. Sometimes a row appeared to branch into two rows with the same tilt, or conversely where two rows merged into one row depending upon the mesial-to-lateral direction in which the row was viewed. Some rows showed both pairing and branching/merging along their length. These tended to be among the longest rows identified, and they often crossed the central region with extensions into the lateral and mesial regions. The most frequent row arrangement was a row of petite length nestled at the side of another row having the same rod tilt (30% of all rows). These were termed -focal stacks- and may relate to the evolution of uniserial rat and mouse incisor enamel from a multilayered ancestor. The mesial and lateral endpoints of rows also showed complex arrangements with the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ), the inner enamel layer itself, and the boundary area to the outer enamel layer. It was concluded that the diversity in row lengths and various spatial arrangements both within and between rows across the transverse plane provides a method to interlock the enamel layer across each region and keep the enamel layer compact relative to the curving DEJ surface. The uniserial pattern for rows in mouse mandibular incisors is not uniform, but diverse and very complex.Enamel rods in rodent incisors are arranged as stacked rows with alternating tilt angles across the transverse plane of the tooth. This study quantifies row patterns to determine if the layering of the rows and the alternating tilt angles are uniform or more irregular and complex in arrangement. The results indicated considerable diversity in row lengths, row tilts and 2D spatial row arrangements both within and between rows. | |
dc.publisher | Springer Science | |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | |
dc.subject.other | enamel formation | |
dc.subject.other | row irregularities | |
dc.subject.other | rows of enamel rods | |
dc.subject.other | spatial distribution | |
dc.subject.other | ameloblast movement | |
dc.subject.other | decussation | |
dc.title | Characteristics of the transverse 2D uniserial arrangement of rows of decussating enamel rods in the inner enamel layer of mouse mandibular incisors | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Medicine (General) | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/151964/1/joa13053_am.pdf | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/151964/2/joa13053.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/joa.13053 | |
dc.identifier.source | Journal of Anatomy | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Smith CE, Warshawsky H ( 1976 ) Movement of entire cell populations during renewal of the rat incisor as shown by radoioautography after labeling with 3H-thymidine. The concept of a continuously differentiating cross-sectional segment. (With an appendix on the development of the periodontal ligament). Am J Anat 145, 225 - 259. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Nishikawa S ( 2017 ) Cytoskeleton, intercellular junctions, planar cell polarity, and cell movement in amelogenesis. J Oral Biosci 59, 197 - 204. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Osborn JW ( 1970 ) The mechanism of ameloblast movement: a hypothesis. Calcif Tissue Res 5, 344 - 359. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Osborn JW ( 1990 ) A 3-dimensional model to describe the relation between prism directions, parazones and diazones, and the Hunter-Schreger bands in human tooth enamel. Arch Oral Biol 35, 869 - 878. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Radlanski RJ, Renz H ( 2006 ) Developmental movements of the inner enamel epithelium as derived from micromorphological features. Eur J Oral Sci 114 ( Suppl 1 ), 343 - 348. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ramenzoni LL, Line SR ( 2006 ) Automated biometrics-based personal identification of the Hunter-Schreger bands of dental enamel. Proc Biol Sci 273, 1155 - 1158. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Rensberger JM, von Koenigswald W ( 1980 ) Functional and phylogenetic interpretation of enamel microstructure in rhinoceros. Paleobiology 6, 477 - 495. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Risnes S ( 1979a ) A method of calculating the speed of movement of ameloblasts during rat incisor amelogenesis. Arch Oral Biol 24, 299 - 306. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Risnes S ( 1979b ) A scanning electron microscope study of aberrations in the prism pattern of rat incisor inner enamel. Am J Anat 154, 419 - 436. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Risnes S, Septier D, Deville de Periere D, et al. ( 2002 ) TEM observations on the ameloblast/enamel interface in the rat incisor. Connect Tissue Res 43, 496 - 504. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sahni A ( 1985 ) Evolutionary trends in the enamel of rodent incisors. In: Evolutionary Relationships Among Rodents: A Multidisciplinary Analysis (eds Luckett WP, Hartenberger J-L ), pp. 133 - 150. New York: Springer Science. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Simmer JP, Papagerakis P, Smith CE, et al. ( 2010 ) Regulation of dental enamel shape and hardness. J Dent Res 89, 1024 - 1038. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Skobe Z ( 2006 ) SEM evidence that one ameloblast secretes one keyhole-shaped enamel rod in monkey teeth. Eur J Oral Sci 114 ( Suppl 1 ), 338 - 342. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Smith CE, Warshawsky H ( 1977 ) Quantitative analysis of cell turnover in the enamel organ of the rat incisor. Evidence for ameloblast death immediately after enamel matrix secretion. Anat Rec 187, 63 - 98. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Smith CE, Hu Y, Hu JC, et al. ( 2019 ) Quantitative analysis of the core 2D arrangement and distribution of enamel rods in cross-sections of mandibular mouse incisors. J Anat 234, 274 - 290. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sourial N, Wolfson C, Zhu B, et al. ( 2010 ) Correspondence analysis is a useful tool to uncover the relationships among categorical variables. J Clin Epidemiol 63, 638 - 646. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Stefen C, Rensberger JM ( 1999 ) The specialized enamel structure of hyaenids (Mammalia, Hyaenidae): description and development within the lineage - including percrocutids. Scanning Microsc 13, 363 - 380. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Tabuce R, Delmer C, Gheerbrant E ( 2007 ) Evolution of the tooth enamel microstructure in the earliest proboscideans (Mammalia). Zool J Linn Soc 149, 611 - 628. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Tomes J ( 1850 ) On the structure of the dental tissues of the order rodentia. Phil Trans R Soc Lond 140, 529 - 567. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Varner VD, Nelson CM ( 2014 ) Cellular and physical mechanisms of branching morphogenesis. Development 141, 2750 - 2759. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Vieytes EC, Morgan CC, Verzi DH ( 2007 ) Adaptive diversity of incisor enamel microstructure in South American burrowing rodents (family Ctenomyidae, Caviomorpha). J Anat 211, 296 - 302. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Warshawsky H ( 1971 ) A light and electron microscopic study of the nearly mature enamel of rat incisors. Anat Rec 169, 559 - 583. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Warshawsky H ( 1978 ) A freeze-fracture study of the topographic relationship between inner enamel-secretory ameloblasts in the rat incisor. Am J Anat 152, 153 - 207. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Yahyazadehfar M, Bajaj D, Arola DD ( 2013 ) Hidden contributions of the enamel rods on the fracture resistance of human teeth. Acta Biomater 9, 4806 - 4814. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Yilmaz ED, Schneider GA, Swain MV ( 2015 ) Influence of structural hierarchy on the fracture behaviour of tooth enamel. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 373, rsta.2014.0130. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Yuan X, Nishikawa S ( 2014 ) Angular distribution of cross-sectioned cell boundaries at the distal terminal web in differentiating preameloblasts, inner enamel secretory ameloblasts and outer enamel secretory ameloblasts. Microscopy (Oxf) 63, 33 - 39. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Alloing-Séguier L, Lihoreau F, Boisserie J-R, et al. ( 2014 ) Enamel microstructure evolution in anthracotheres (Mammalia, Cetartiodactyla) and new insights on hippopotamoid phylogeny. Zool J Linn Soc 171, 668 - 695. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Alloing-Séguier L, Martinand-Mari C, Barczi JF, et al. ( 2017 ) Linking 2D observations to 3D modeling of enamel microstructure-a new integrative framework applied to Hippopotamoidea evolutionary history. J Mamm Evol 24, 221 - 231. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Alloing-Séguier L, Marivaux L, Barczi JF, et al. ( 2018 ) Relationships between enamel prism decussation and organization of the ameloblast layer in rodent incisors. Anat Rec 26, 24-000. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Boyde A ( 1969 ) Electron microscopic observations relating to the nature and development of prism decussation in mammalian dental enamel. Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol 12, 151 - 207. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cox BN ( 2013 ) How the tooth got its stripes: patterning via strain-cued motility. J R Soc Interface 10, 20-130-266. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Goldberg M, Kellermann O, Dimitrova-Nakov S, et al. ( 2014 ) Comparative studies between mice molars and incisors are required to draw an overview of enamel structural complexity. Front Physiol 5, Article 359. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hanaizumi Y, Maeda T, Takano Y ( 1996 ) Three-dimensional arrangement of enamel prisms and their relation to the formation of Hunter-Schreger bands in dog tooth. Cell Tissue Res 286, 103 - 114. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hanaizumi Y, Yokota R, Domon T, et al. ( 2010 ) The initial process of enamel prism arrangement and its relation to the Hunter-Schreger bands in dog teeth. Arch Histol Cytol 73, 23 - 36. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hiscock TW, Megason SG ( 2015 ) Orientation of turing-like patterns by morphogen gradients and tissue anisotropies. Cell Syst 1, 408 - 416. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Jiang Y, Spears IR, Macho GA ( 2003 ) An investigation into fractured surfaces of enamel of modern human teeth: a combined SEM and computer visualisation study. Arch Oral Biol 48, 449 - 457. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kawai N ( 1955 ) Comparative anatomy of the bands of Schreger. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn 27, 115 - 131. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | von Koenigswald W ( 1985 ) Evolutionary trends in the enamel of rodent incisors. In: Evolutionary Relationships Among Rodents: a Multidisciplinary Analysis (eds Luckett WP, Hartenberger J-L ), pp. 403 - 422. New York: Springer Science. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | von Koenigswald W, Clemens WA ( 1992 ) Levels of complexity in the microstructure of mammalian enamel and their application in studies of systematics. [Review]. Scanning Microsc 6, 195 - 217. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | von Koenigswald W, Pfretzschner HU ( 1987 ) Hunter-Schreger-Bänder im Zahnschmelz von Säugetieren (Mammalia). Zoomorphology 106, 329 - 338. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | von Koenigswald W, Rensberger JM, Pretzschner HU ( 1987 ) Changes in the tooth enamel of early Paleocene mammals allowing increased diet diversity. Nature 328, 150 - 152. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | von Koenigswald W, Holbrook LT, Rose KD ( 2011 ) Diversity and evolution of Hunter - Schreger Band configuration in tooth enamel of perissodactyl mammals. Acta Palaeontol Pol 56, 11 - 32. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kondo S, Miura T ( 2010 ) Reaction-diffusion model as a framework for understanding biological pattern formation. Science 329, 1616 - 1620. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lynch CD, O’Sullivan VR, Dockery P, et al. ( 2010 ) Hunter-Schreger Band patterns in human tooth enamel. J Anat 217, 106 - 115. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lyngstadaas SP, Moinichen CB, Risnes S ( 1998 ) Crown morphology, enamel distribution, and enamel structure in mouse molars. Anat Rec 250, 268 - 280. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Martin T ( 1993 ) Early rodent incisor enamel evolution: phylogenetic implications. J Mol Evol 1, 227 - 254. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Martin T ( 1999 ) Evolution of incisor enamel microstructure in Theridomyidae (Rodentia). J Vertebr Paleontol 19, 550 - 565. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Martin T ( 2007 ) Incisor enamel microstructure and the concept of sciuravida. Bull Carnegie Mus Nat Hist 2007, 127 - 141. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | McIntyre DC, Lyons DC, Martik M, et al. ( 2014 ) Branching out: origins of the sea urchin larval skeleton in development and evolution. Genesis 52, 173 - 185. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Moinichen CB, Lyngstadaas SP, Risnes S ( 1996 ) Morphological characteristics of mouse incisor enamel. J Anat 189, 325 - 333. | |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.