Are Pedagogical Ideals Embraced or Imposed? The Case of Reading Instruction in the Republic of Guinea
dc.contributor.author | Anderson-Levitt, Kathryn | |
dc.contributor.author | Alimasi, Ntal-I’Mbirwa | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-15T01:05:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-11-15T01:05:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2001 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 1-56750-516-3; 1-56750-517-1 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/152114 | |
dc.description | Anderson-Levitt, Kathryn M., and Ntal-I’Mbirwa Alimasi. 2001. "Are Pedagogical Ideals Embraced or Imposed? The Case of Reading Instruction in the Republic of Guinea." In Policy as Practice: Toward a Comparative Sociocultural Analysis of Educational Policy, edited by Margaret Sutton and Bradley A. U. Levinson, 25-58. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This chapter examines ideals of “best practice” or “good teaching,” beginning from the premise that pedagogical ideals represent cultural and social constructions, not the simple discovery of scientific truth. But, if pedagogical ideals are culturally constructed, who constructs them, when, where and how? Where do notions of good teaching come from and how do people respond when they encounter a new notion? Through a case study of the Republic of Guinea in West Africa we examine how certain ideals of reading instruction, such as the “mixed method” or the notion of teachers’ professional autonomy, get defined as good practice. We clarify what we mean by “foreign” ideals in the context of an educational system originally imported from outside Guinea. We show that the Guinean elite had occasion and motivation for embracing foreign ideals willingly, but we also raise doubts about how deeply Guineans accepted certain ideals. There is evidence of the donors’ clear economic power over Guinean decision-makers, but also of the Guineans’ far-from-passive responses to that power. The debates provoked by new language arts textbooks illustrate how difficult it becomes to distinguish purely strategic mastery of Western notions from true appropriation of the ideals. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Spencer Foundation | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | education, reform, comparative education, borrowing, traveling reforms, Guinea, West Africa, reading instruction | en_US |
dc.title | Are Pedagogical Ideals Embraced or Imposed? The Case of Reading Instruction in the Republic of Guinea | en_US |
dc.type | Book Chapter | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Anthropology and Archaeology | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Behavioral Sciences: Anthropology, Department of (UM-Dearborn) | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | University of Pittsburgh | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Dearborn | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/152114/1/Anderson-Levitt & Alimasi v. 9.doc | |
dc.identifier.source | Policy as Practice: Toward a Comparative Sociocultural Analysis of Educational Policy | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0001-5412-1818 | en_US |
dc.identifier.name-orcid | Anderson-Levitt, Kathryn; 0000-0001-5412-1818 | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Behavioral Sciences: Anthropology, Department of (UM-Dearborn) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.