Show simple item record

A qualitative comparison of DSM depression criteria to language used by older church-going African Americans

dc.contributor.authorAkinyemi, Esther
dc.contributor.authorWatkins, Daphne, C.
dc.contributor.authorKavanagh, Janet
dc.contributor.authorJohnson-Lawrence, Vicki
dc.contributor.authorLynn, Shana
dc.contributor.authorKales, Helen C.
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-13T18:42:33Z
dc.date.available2019-12-13T18:42:33Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationAging & Mental Health, vol. 22, no. 9, 2018, pp. 1155-1161en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/152353
dc.description.abstractObjective: Depression in late life is associated with substantial suffering, disability, suicide risk, and decreased health-related quality of life. According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), a depression diagnosis is derived from a constellation of symptoms that may be described differently by different people. For example, the DSM language may be inadequate in capturing these symptoms in certain populations such as African-Americans, whose rates of depression misdiagnosis is high. Methods: This study reports the findings from a church-based, qualitative study with older African Americans (n = 50) regarding the language they use when discussing depression and depression treatment, and how this compares to the DSM-IV depression criteria. Content analyses of the in-depth discussions with African-American male and female focus group participants resulted in a deeper understanding of the language they used to describe depression. This language was then mapped onto the DSM-IV depression criteria. Results: While some words used by the focus group participants mapped well onto the DSM-IV criteria, some of the language did not map well, such as language describing irritability, negative thought processes, hopelessness, loneliness, loss of control, helplessness, and social isolation. Conclusions: The focus group setting provided insight to the language used by older, church-going African-Americans to describe depression. Implications include the advantages of using qualitative data to help inform clinical encounters with older African-Americans.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project was supported by the Program for Positive Aging in the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Michigan, and the original study was titled ‘Attitudes, perceptions, and beliefs pertaining to mental health, depression, and depression care of elder African-American church attendees’ (Principal Investigator: Helen Kales, MD, UM Department of Psychiatry).en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.subjectdepressionen_US
dc.subjectAfrican Americansen_US
dc.subjectspiritualityen_US
dc.subjectDSMen_US
dc.subjectolder adultsen_US
dc.titleA qualitative comparison of DSM depression criteria to language used by older church-going African Americansen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Work
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Social Worken_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Psychiatryen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Public Health and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Psychiatry, Henry Ford Health Systemen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/152353/1/Akinyemi Watkins Kavanagh Johnson-Lawrence Lynn Kales_2017_A qualitative comparison of DSM depression criteria to language used by older church going African Americans.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13607863.2017.1337717
dc.identifier.sourceAging & Mental Healthen_US
dc.owningcollnameSocial Work, School of (SSW)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.