Show simple item record

Eleutherodactylus in coffee agroecosystems: Effects of farm management on vegetation selection, species richness, and abundances of Puerto Rican frogs

dc.contributor.authorHarmon, Kristopher
dc.contributor.advisorPerfecto, Ivette
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-20T19:03:37Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2019-12-20T19:03:37Z
dc.date.issued2019-12
dc.date.submitted2019-12
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/152447
dc.description.abstractAmphibians are declining globally as the combined threats of climate change, habitat loss, and infectious disease intensify and interact. Curbing species losses requires implementing conservation measures beyond natural or protected areas. Shaded coffee farms stand out among human-modified landscapes in their capacity to harbor high levels of biodiversity. In Puerto Rico, the ranges of most Eleutherodactylus frogs, many of which are endangered and declining, coincide with the primary coffee-producing region on the island. In this study we used a combination of radio telemetry, bioacoustic monitoring, GIS, and vegetation surveys to investigate the degree to which agricultural habitats at multiple spatial scales may contribute to Eleutherodactylus conservation. We compared frog species diversity and abundance between and among farm and forest sites and assessed the influence of farm management and landscape variables. To understand how a common species uses coffee agroecosystems as novel habitat, we tracked Eleutherodactylus coqui using radio telemetry and identified trends in vegetation use and microhabitat selection within farms. At the landscape scale, we found farms and forests harbored similar numbers of species but differed in their species composition, with no forest specialists detected in farm systems. Surrounding landcover did not impact farmlevel richness or abundance. At the farm scale, Eleutherodactylus species varied in their responses to aspects of farm management, with the exception of uniformly negative responses to pesticide application and high densities of root crops which may concentrate pesticides. Within farms, E. coqui showed an affinity for plantain (Musa spp.), especially those with hanging dry leaves, for diurnal retreat sites. No vegetation preference was detected at night when frogs were active. We conclude that coffee farms in Puerto Rico provide suitable habitat for amphibians, yet may not be meeting the needs of forest specialist species. Within farms a generalist species was most abundant where microhabitats essential for shelter and reproduction were plentiful; such resources are likely lacking for species dependent on forests. Despite similar levels of diversity to nearby forests, coffee farms under current management regimes may not be useful habitat for species of conservation concern in Puerto Rico.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectcoffeeen_US
dc.subjectconservationen_US
dc.subjectbiodiversityen_US
dc.subjectPuerto Ricoen_US
dc.titleEleutherodactylus in coffee agroecosystems: Effects of farm management on vegetation selection, species richness, and abundances of Puerto Rican frogsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenameMaster of Science (MS)en_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSchool for Environment and Sustainabilityen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberVandermeer, John
dc.identifier.uniqnameharmonkpen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/152447/1/Harmon_Krsitopher_Thesis.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.