View Item 

Show simple item record

P2–200: Self‐ versus informant‐based cognitive complaints: Relation of E‐Cog scores to imaging, biomarkers and clinical Status in ADNI‐2
dc.contributor.authorRisacher, Shannon
dc.contributor.authorPetersen, Ronald
dc.contributor.authorAisen, Paul
dc.contributor.authorJack, Clifford
dc.contributor.authorKoeppe, Robert
dc.contributor.authorJagust, William
dc.contributor.authorFarias, Sarah Tomaszewski
dc.contributor.authorMungas, Dan
dc.contributor.authorTrojanowski, John
dc.contributor.authorShaw, Leslie
dc.contributor.authorWeiner, Michael
dc.contributor.authorSaykin, Andrew
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-13T15:05:28Z
dc.date.available2020-01-13T15:05:28Z
dc.date.issued2013-07
dc.identifier.citationRisacher, Shannon; Petersen, Ronald; Aisen, Paul; Jack, Clifford; Koeppe, Robert; Jagust, William; Farias, Sarah Tomaszewski; Mungas, Dan; Trojanowski, John; Shaw, Leslie; Weiner, Michael; Saykin, Andrew (2013). "P2–200: Self‐ versus informant‐based cognitive complaints: Relation of E‐Cog scores to imaging, biomarkers and clinical Status in ADNI‐2." Alzheimer’s & Dementia 9: P429-P429.
dc.identifier.issn1552-5260
dc.identifier.issn1552-5279
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/152591
dc.publisherThe Alzheimer's Association, Inc.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.titleP2–200: Self‐ versus informant‐based cognitive complaints: Relation of E‐Cog scores to imaging, biomarkers and clinical Status in ADNI‐2
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurology and Neurosciences
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/152591/1/alzjjalz201305845.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jalz.2013.05.845
dc.identifier.sourceAlzheimer’s & Dementia
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
alzjjalz201305845.pdf
Size:
326.0KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.