Show simple item record

Results From a Survey of American Geriatrics Society Members’ Views on Physician‐Assisted Suicide

dc.contributor.authorRosenberg, Lisa J.
dc.contributor.authorButler, Jorie M.
dc.contributor.authorCaprio, Anthony J.
dc.contributor.authorRhodes, Ramona L.
dc.contributor.authorBraun, Ursula K.
dc.contributor.authorVitale, Caroline A.
dc.contributor.authorTelonidis, Jacqueline
dc.contributor.authorPeriyakoil, Vyjeyanthi S.
dc.contributor.authorFarrell, Timothy W.
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-13T15:08:59Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHS
dc.date.available2020-01-13T15:08:59Z
dc.date.issued2020-01
dc.identifier.citationRosenberg, Lisa J.; Butler, Jorie M.; Caprio, Anthony J.; Rhodes, Ramona L.; Braun, Ursula K.; Vitale, Caroline A.; Telonidis, Jacqueline; Periyakoil, Vyjeyanthi S.; Farrell, Timothy W. (2020). "Results From a Survey of American Geriatrics Society Members’ Views on Physician‐Assisted Suicide." Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 68(1): 23-30.
dc.identifier.issn0002-8614
dc.identifier.issn1532-5415
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/152741
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.subject.otherpalliative care
dc.subject.otherend‐of‐life care
dc.subject.otherphysician aid in dying
dc.subject.otherphysician‐assisted death
dc.subject.otherphysician‐assisted suicide
dc.titleResults From a Survey of American Geriatrics Society Members’ Views on Physician‐Assisted Suicide
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeriatrics
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/152741/1/jgs16245_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/152741/2/jgs16245-sup-0001-Supinfo.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/152741/3/jgs16245.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jgs.16245
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllison PD. Missing Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing; 2001.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInstitute of Medicine Committee on Approaching Death Dying in America. Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2015.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEmanuel EJ, Onwuteaka‐Philipsen BD, Urwin JW, Cohen J. Attitudes and practices of euthanasia and physician‐assisted suicide in the United States, Canada, and Europe. JAMA. 2016; 316 ( 1 ): 79 ‐ 90.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMajority of Americans Remain Supportive of Euthanasia. Politics 2017. Gallup (online). http://news.gallup.com/poll/211928/majority-americans-remain-supportive-euthanasia.aspx?g_source=MORAL_ISSUES&g_medium=topic&g_campaign=tiles. Accessed September 16, 2019.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWinfield Cunningham P. The Health 202: Legalizing Assisted Suicide Has Stalled at Every Level. Washington Post (online), October 24, 2017. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/the‐health‐202/2017/10/24/the‐health‐202‐legalizing‐assisted‐suicide‐has‐stalled‐at‐every‐level/59ee109330fb045cba000973/?utm_term=.fb0dff213bb9. Accessed September 16, 2019.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeath With Dignity Around the U.S. https://www.deathwithdignity.org/take-action/. Updated September 16, 2019. Accessed September 16, 2019.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRomine T. CNN (online). April 15, 2019. New Jersey Will Now Allow Terminally Ill Patients to End Their Lives. https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/15/health/nj-assisted-suicide-terminally-ill-law-trnd/index.html. Accessed September 16, 2019.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVilleneuve M. Maine Becomes 8th State to Legalize Assisted Suicide. June 12, 2019. https://www.apnews.com/7f0fe9d789294a02852c1669c892f382. Accessed September 16, 2019.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhysician Assisted Death. Bioethics Briefings. The Hastings Center (online). https://www.thehastingscenter.org/briefingbook/physician-assisted-death. Accessed September 16, 2019.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWatts DT, Howell T. Assisted suicide is not voluntary active euthanasia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992; 40: 1043 ‐ 1046.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSurveyMonkey Inc. 2016. San Mateo, CA. http://www.surveymonkey.com. Accessed March 23, 2016.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. IBM Corp: Armonk, NY; 2013.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePatton MQ. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2002.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceATLAS.ti Software for a Mac Computer, Version 8.1.3. Berlin, Germany: Scientific Software Development; 2018.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSulmasy DP, Finlay I, Fitzgerald F, Foley K, Payne R, Siegler M. Physician‐assisted suicide: why neutrality by organized medicine is neither neutral nor appropriate. J Gen Intern Med. 2018; 33 ( 18 ): 1394 ‐ 1399.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZenz J, Tryba M, Zenz M. Palliative care professionals’ willingness to perform euthanasia or physician assisted suicide. BMC Palliat Care. 2015; 14 ( 60 ): 60.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQuill TE, Cassel CK. Professional organizations’ position statements on physician‐assisted suicide: a case for studied neutrality. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138 ( 3 ): 208 ‐ 211.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2001.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurns KEA, Duffett M, Kho ME, et al. A guide for the design and conduct of self‐administrated surveys of clinicians. CMAJ. 2008; 179 ( 3 ): 245 ‐ 252.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBraithwaite D, Emery J, DeLusignan S, et al. Using the internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative? Fam Practice. 2003; 20 ( 5 ): 545 ‐ 551.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCunningham CT, Quan H, Hemmelgarn B, et al. Exploring physician specialist response rates to web‐based surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015; 15: 32.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.