View Item 

Show simple item record

Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography to Assess Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment on the Iliocostalis Lumborum Muscle: A Feasibility Study
dc.contributor.authorGao, Jing
dc.contributor.authorCaldwell, Judy
dc.contributor.authorMcLin, Keeling
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Man
dc.contributor.authorPark, David
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-13T15:11:32Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHS
dc.date.available2020-01-13T15:11:32Z
dc.date.issued2020-01
dc.identifier.citationGao, Jing; Caldwell, Judy; McLin, Keeling; Zhang, Man; Park, David (2020). "Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography to Assess Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment on the Iliocostalis Lumborum Muscle: A Feasibility Study." Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 39(1): 157-164.
dc.identifier.issn0278-4297
dc.identifier.issn1550-9613
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/152848
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.subject.othersomatic dysfunction
dc.subject.otherosteopathic manipulative treatment
dc.subject.othermusculoskeletal disorder
dc.subject.otherultrasound
dc.subject.othershear wave elastography
dc.titleUltrasound Shear Wave Elastography to Assess Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment on the Iliocostalis Lumborum Muscle: A Feasibility Study
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/152848/1/jum15092.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/152848/2/jum15092_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jum.15092
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKot BCW, Zhang ZJ, Lee AWC, Leung VYF, Fu SN. Elastic modulus of muscle and tendon with shear wave ultrasound elastography: variations with different technical settings. PLoS One 2012; 7: e44348.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson SM, Kurtz ME. Conditions and diagnoses for which osteopathic primary care physicians and specialists use osteopathic manipulative treatment. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2002; 102: 527 – 540.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGamber R, Holland S, Russo D, Cruser DA, Hilsenrath PE. Cost‐effective osteopathic manipulative medicine: a literature review of cost‐effectiveness analysis for osteopathic manipulative treatment. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2005; 105: 235 – 267.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFranke H, Franke JD, Fryer G. Osteopathic manipulative treatment for nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014; 15: 286.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteel A, Sundberg T, Reid R, et al. Osteopathic manipulative treatment: a systematic review and critical appraisal of comparative effectiveness and health economics research. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2017; 27: 165 – 175.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLicciardone J, Gamber R, Cardarelli K. Patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes associated with osteopathic manipulative treatment. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2002; 102: 13 – 20.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBasford JR, Jenkyn TR, An KN, Ehman RL, Heers G, Kaufman KR. Evaluation of healthy and diseased muscle with magnetic resonance elastography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 1530 – 1536.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGay CW, Robinson ME, George SZ, Perlstein WM, Bishop MD. Immediate changes after manual therapy in resting‐state functional connectivity as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging in participants with induced low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2014; 37: 614 – 627.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJenkyn TR, Ehman RL, An KN. Noninvasive muscle tension measurement using the novel technique of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). J Biomech 2003; 36: 1917 – 1921.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdrian M. MRI: understanding its limitations. Br Columb Med J 2005; 47: 359 – 361.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKennedy S, Forman HP. Deficit reduction act: effects on utilization of noninvasive musculoskeletal imaging. Radiology 2012; 264: 146 – 153.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYue G, Fuglevand AJ, Nordstrom MA, Enoka RM. Limitation of the surface electromyography technique for estimating motor unit synchronization. Biol Cybern 1995; 73: 223 – 233.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen J, O’Dell M, He W, Du LJ, Li PC, Gao J. Ultrasound shear wave elastography in the assessment of passive biceps brachii muscle stiffness: influence of sex and elbow position. Clin Imaging 2017; 45: 26 – 29.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGennisson JL, Deffieux T, Mace E, Montaldo G, Fink M, Tanter M. Viscoelastic and anisotropic mechanical properties of in vivo muscle tissue assessed by SuperSonic shear imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010; 36: 789 – 801.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDu LJ, He W, Cheng LG, Li S, Pan YS, Gao J. Ultrasound shear wave elastography in assessment of muscle stiffness in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a primary observation. Clin Imaging 2016; 40: 1075 – 1080.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGao J, He W, Du LJ, et al. Quantitative ultrasound imaging to assess the biceps brachii muscle in chronic post‐stroke spasticity: preliminary observation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2018; 44: 1931 – 1940.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrandenburg JE, Eby SF, Song PF, Brault JS, Chen SG, An KN. Ultrasound elastography: the new frontier in direct measurement of muscle stiffness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014; 95: 2207 – 2219.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCallaghan JP, Gunning JL, McGill SM. The relationship between lumbar spine load and muscle activity during extensor exercises. Physiol Ther 1998; 78: 8 – 18.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFryer G, Morris T, Gibbons P. Paraspinal muscle and intervertebral dysfunction: part one. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2004; 27: 267 – 274.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoubert D, De Pauw R, Meeus M, et al. Lumbar muscle structure and function in chronic versus recurrent low back pain: a cross‐sectional study. Spine J 2017; 17: 1285 – 1296.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoppenhaver S, Kniss J, Lilley D, et al. Reliability of ultrasound shear‐wave elastography in assessing low back musculature elasticity in asymptomatic individuals. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2018; 39: 49 – 57.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCreze M, Nyangoh Timoh K, Gagey O, Rocher L, Bellin MF, Soubeyrand M. Feasibility assessment of shear wave elastography to lumbar back muscles: a radioanatomic study. Clin Anat 2017; 30: 774 – 780.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMukaka MM. Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J 2012; 24: 69 – 71.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine. Glossary of osteopathic terminology. American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine website. https://www.aacom.org/docs/default-source/insideome/got2011ed.pdf. Revised November 2011.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLicciardone JC, Kearns CM. Somatic dysfunction and its association with chronic low back pain, back‐specific functioning, and general health: results from the OSTEOPATHIC trial. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2012; 112: 420 – 428.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoy DG, Smith E, Cross M, et al. Reflecting on the global burden of musculoskeletal conditions: lessons learnt from the global burden of disease 2010 study and the next steps forward. Ann Rheum Dis 2015; 74: 4 – 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWoolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ 2003; 81: 646 – 656.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllen KD. Musculoskeletal health: addressing the leading causes of disability. NC Med J 2017; 78: 306 ‐ 309.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnow RJ, Seffinger MA, Hensel KL, Wiseman R. American Osteopathic Association guidelines for osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) for patients with low back pain. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2016; 116: 536 – 549.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurns DK, Wells MR. Gross range of motion in cervical spine: the effects of osteopathic muscle energy technique in asymptomatic patients. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2006; 106: 137 – 142.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jum15092.pdf
Size:
1.761MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
jum15092_am.pdf
Size:
2.437MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.