Deliberative assessment of surrogate consent in dementia research
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Scott Y.H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Uhlmann, Rebecca A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Appelbaum, Paul S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Knopman, David S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, H. Myra | |
dc.contributor.author | Damschroder, Laura | |
dc.contributor.author | Beattie, Elizabeth | |
dc.contributor.author | Struble, Laura | |
dc.contributor.author | De Vries, Raymond | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-13T15:12:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-13T15:12:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-07 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Kim, Scott Y.H.; Uhlmann, Rebecca A.; Appelbaum, Paul S.; Knopman, David S.; Kim, H. Myra; Damschroder, Laura; Beattie, Elizabeth; Struble, Laura; De Vries, Raymond (2010). "Deliberative assessment of surrogate consent in dementia research." Alzheimer’s & Dementia 6(4): 342-350. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1552-5260 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1552-5279 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/152905 | |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | |
dc.publisher | National Bioethics Advisory Commission | |
dc.subject.other | Research ethics | |
dc.subject.other | Surrogate‐based research | |
dc.subject.other | Alzheimer’s disease | |
dc.subject.other | Impaired decision‐making capacity | |
dc.subject.other | Informed consent | |
dc.subject.other | Deliberative democracy | |
dc.subject.other | Bioethics | |
dc.title | Deliberative assessment of surrogate consent in dementia research | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Neurology and Neurosciences | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/152905/1/alzjjalz200906001.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jalz.2009.06.001 | |
dc.identifier.source | Alzheimer’s & Dementia | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | CM Clark, JHT Karlawish. Alzheimer disease: current concepts and emerging diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Ann Intern Med. 138: 2003; 400 – 410 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | C Ferri, M Prince, C Brayne, H Brodaty, L Fratiglioni, M Ganguli, et al. Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi Consensus Study. Lancet. 366: 2005; 2112 – 2117 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | JM Orgogozo, S Gilman, JF Dartigues, B Laurent, M Puel, LC Kirby, et al. Subacute meningoencephalitis in a subset of patients with AD after Aβ42 immunization. Neurology. 61: 2003; 46 – 54 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | MH Tuszynski, L Thal, M Pay, DP Salmon, S Hoi, R Bakay, et al. A phase 1 clinical trial of nerve growth factor gene therapy for Alzheimer disease. Nat Med. 11: 2005; 551 – 555 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | O Okonkwo, HR Griffith, K Belue, S Lanza, EY Zamrini, LE Harrell, et al. Medical decision‐making capacity in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Neurology. 69: 2007; 1528 – 1535 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | SYH Kim, ED Caine, GW Currier, A Leibovici, JM Ryan. Assessing the competence of persons with Alzheimer’s disease in providing informed consent for participation in research. Am J Psychiatry. 158: 2001; 712 – 717 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | D Hoffmann, J Schwartz. Proxy consent to participation of the decisionally impaired in medical research––Maryland’s policy initiative. J Health Care Law Policy. 1: 1998; 123 – 153 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | E Saks, L Dunn, J Wimer, M Gonzales, S Kim. Proxy consent to research: legal landscape. Yale J Health Law Policy Ethics. 8: 2008; 37 – 78 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | National Bioethics Advisory Commission Research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity, volume 1. 1998; National Bioethics Advisory Commission: Rockville, MD | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Maryland Attorney General’s Research Working Group Final report of the Attorney General’s Research Working Group. 1998; Office of the Maryland Attorney General: Baltimore, MD | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | New York Department of Health Advisory Work Group on Human Subject Research Involving the Protected Classes Recommendations on the oversight of human subject research involving the protected classes. 1999; State of New York Department of Health: Albany, NY | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | SYH Kim, PS Appelbaum, DV Jeste, JT Olin. Proxy and surrogate consent in geriatric neuropsychiatric research: update and recommendations. Am J Psychiatry. 161: 2004; 797 – 806 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Office of Human Research Protections. Request for information and comments on research that involves adult individuals with impaired decision‐making capacity. Fed Reg. 72: 2007; 50966 – 50970 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Dementia: ethical issues (consultation paper). 2008; Nuffield Council on Bioethics: London | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | SYH Kim, H Kim, C McCallum, P Tariot. What do people at risk for Alzheimer’s disease think about surrogate consent for research?. Neurology. 65: 2005; 1395 – 1401 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | G Bravo, M Paquet, MF Dubois. Opinions regarding who should consent to research on behalf of an older adult suffering from dementia. Int J Soc Res Pract. 2: 2003; 49 – 65 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | D Wendler, RA Martinez, D Fairclough, T Sunderland, E Emanuel. Views of potential subjects toward proposed regulations for clinical research with adults unable to consent. Am J Psychiatry. 159: 2002; 585 – 591 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | J Karlawish, J Rubright, D Casarett, M Cary, T Ten Have, P Sankar. Older adults’ attitudes toward enrollment of non‐competent subjects participating in Alzheimer’s research. Am J Psychiatry. 166: 2009; 182 – 188 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | S Kim, H Kim, K Langa, J Karlawish, D Knopman, P Appelbaum. Surrogate consent for dementia research: a national survey of older Americans. Neurology. 72: 2009; 149 – 155 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | JS Fishkin. Beyond polling alone: the quest for an informed public. Crit Rev. 18: 2006; 157 – 165 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | A Gutmann, D Thompson. Deliberating about bioethics. Hastings Cent Rep. 27: 1997; 38 – 41 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | JR Muroff, SL Hoerauf, SYH Kim. Is psychiatric research stigmatized? An experimental survey of the public. Schizophr Bull. 32: 2006; 129 – 136 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | RS Spieldman, RE McGinnis, WJ Ewens. Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin‐dependence diabetes mellitus. Am J Hum Genet. 52: 1993; 506 – 516 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | LS Schneider, JT Olin, SA Lyness, HC Chui. Eligibility of Alzheimer’s disease clinic patients for clinical trials. J Am Geriatr Soc. 45: 1997; 923 – 928 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | L Damschroder, J Pritts, M Neblo, R Kalarickal, JW Creswell, R Hayward. Patients, privacy and trust: patients’ willingness to allow researchers to access their medical records. Soc Sci Med. 64: 2007; 223 – 235 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | DM Secko, N Preto, S Niemeyer, MM Burgess. Informed consent in biobank research: a deliberative approach to the debate. Soc Sci Med. 68: 2009; 781 – 789 | |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.