Clinical use of amyloid‐positron emission tomography neuroimaging: Practical and bioethical considerations
dc.contributor.author | Witte, Michael M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Foster, Norman L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Fleisher, Adam S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Williams, Monique M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Quaid, Kimberly | |
dc.contributor.author | Wasserman, Michael | |
dc.contributor.author | Hunt, Gail | |
dc.contributor.author | Roberts, J. Scott | |
dc.contributor.author | Rabinovici, Gil D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Levenson, James L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hake, Ann Marie | |
dc.contributor.author | Hunter, Craig A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Van Campen, Luann E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pontecorvo, Michael J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hochstetler, Helen M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Tabas, Linda B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Trzepacz, Paula T. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-13T15:15:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-13T15:15:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-09 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Witte, Michael M.; Foster, Norman L.; Fleisher, Adam S.; Williams, Monique M.; Quaid, Kimberly; Wasserman, Michael; Hunt, Gail; Roberts, J. Scott; Rabinovici, Gil D.; Levenson, James L.; Hake, Ann Marie; Hunter, Craig A.; Van Campen, Luann E.; Pontecorvo, Michael J.; Hochstetler, Helen M.; Tabas, Linda B.; Trzepacz, Paula T. (2015). "Clinical use of amyloid‐positron emission tomography neuroimaging: Practical and bioethical considerations." Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring 1(3): 358-367. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2352-8729 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2352-8729 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/153020 | |
dc.description.abstract | Until recently, estimation of β‐amyloid plaque density as a key element for identifying Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology as the cause of cognitive impairment was only possible at autopsy. Now with amyloid‐positron emission tomography (amyloid‐PET) neuroimaging, this AD hallmark can be detected antemortem. Practitioners and patients need to better understand potential diagnostic benefits and limitations of amyloid‐PET and the complex practical, ethical, and social implications surrounding this new technology. To complement the practical considerations, Eli Lilly and Company sponsored a Bioethics Advisory Board to discuss ethical issues that might arise from clinical use of amyloid‐PET neuroimaging with patients being evaluated for causes of cognitive decline. To best address the multifaceted issues associated with amyloid‐PET neuroimaging, we recommend this technology be used only by experienced imaging and treating physicians in appropriately selected patients and only in the context of a comprehensive clinical evaluation with adequate explanations before and after the scan. | |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | |
dc.publisher | American Psychiatric Association | |
dc.subject.other | Biomarkers | |
dc.subject.other | Amyloid‐β | |
dc.subject.other | Diagnostic use | |
dc.subject.other | Positron emission tomography | |
dc.subject.other | Bioethics in neurology | |
dc.subject.other | Mild cognitive impairment | |
dc.subject.other | Alzheimer’s disease | |
dc.subject.other | Dementia | |
dc.title | Clinical use of amyloid‐positron emission tomography neuroimaging: Practical and bioethical considerations | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Neurology and Neurosciences | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/153020/1/dad2jdadm201506006.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.dadm.2015.06.006 | |
dc.identifier.source | Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | L. Hinton, C. Franz, J. Friend. Pathways to dementia diagnosis: Evidence for cross‐ethnic differences. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 18: 2004; 134 – 144 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | C.R. Jack, M.S. Albert, D.S. Knopman, G.M. McKhann, R.A. Sperling, M.C. Carrillo, et al. Introduction to the recommendations from the National Institute on Aging‐Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 7: 2011; 257 – 262 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | G.B. Frisoni, M. Bocchetta, G. Chételat, G.D. Rabinovici, M.J. de Leon, J. Kaye, et al. Imaging markers for Alzheimer disease: Which vs how. Neurology. 81: 2013; 487 – 500 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | B. Dubois, H.H. Feldman, C. Jacova, H. Hampel, J.L. Molinuevo, K. Blennow, et al. Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer’s disease: The IWG‐2 criteria. Lancet Neurol. 13: 2014; 614 – 629 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | E. Hogervorst, L. Barnetson, K.A. Jobst, Z. Nagy, M. Combrinck, A.D. Smith. Diagnosing dementia: Interrater reliability assessment and accuracy of the NINCDS/ADRDA criteria versus CERAD histopathological criteria for Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 11: 2000; 107 – 113 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | H. Johnson, W.P. Bouman, G. Pinner. On telling the truth in Alzheimer’s disease: A pilot study of current practice and attitudes. Int Psychogeriatr. 12: 2000; 221 – 229 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | B.D. Carpenter, C. Xiong, E.K. Porensky, M.M. Lee, P.J. Brown, M. Coats, et al. Reaction to a dementia diagnosis in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 56: 2008; 405 – 412 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | J. Lecouturier, C. Bamford, J.C. Hughes, J.J. Francis, R. Foy, M. Johnston, et al. Appropriate disclosure of a diagnosis of dementia: Identifying the key behaviours of “best practice”. BMC Health Serv Res. 8: 2008; 95 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | A. Bradford, M.E. Kunik, P. Schulz, S.P. Williams, H. Singh. Missed and delayed diagnosis of dementia in primary care prevalence and contributing factors. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 23: 2009; 306 – 314 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | G.T. Grossberg, D.D. Christensen, P.A. Griffith, D.R. Kerwin, G. Hunt, E.J. Hall. The art of sharing the diagnosis and management of Alzheimer’s disease with patients and caregivers: Recommendations of an expert consensus panel. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 12: 2010, PCC.09cs00833 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | J.A. Schneider, D.A. Bennett. Where vascular meets neurodegenerative disease. Stroke. 41 (10 Suppl): 2010; S144 – S146 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | V.L. Villemagne, S. Burnham, P. Bourgeat, B. Brown, K.A. Ellis, O. Salvado, et al. Australian Imaging Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) Research Group. Amyloid β deposition, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease: A prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 12: 2013; 357 – 367 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | M.A. Mintun, G.N. Larossa, Y.I. Sheline, C.S. Dence, S.Y. Lee, R.H. Mach, et al. [11C]PIB in a nondemented population: Potential antecedent marker of Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 67: 2006; 446 – 452 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | E.C. Mormino, J.T. Kluth, C.M. Madison, G.D. Rabinovici, S.L. Baker, B.L. Miller, et al. Episodic memory loss is related to hippocampal‐mediated beta‐amyloid deposition in elderly subjects. Brain. 132 (Pt 5): 2009; 1310 – 1323 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | K.E. Pike, G. Savage, V.L. Villemagne, S. Ng, S.A. Moss, P. Maruff, et al. Beta‐amyloid imaging and memory in non‐demented individuals: Evidence for preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 130 (Pt11): 2007; 2837 – 2844 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | V.L. Villemagne, K.E. Pike, G. Chetelat, K.A. Ellis, R.S. Mulligan, P. Bourgeat, et al. Longitudinal assessment of beta‐amyloid and cognition in aging and Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 69: 2011; 181 – 192 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Highlights of prescribing information: Amyvid (florbetapir F 18 injection) for intravenous use. 2014, Available at: http://pi.lilly.com/us/amyvid‐uspi.pdf. Accessed June 4, 2014 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Vizamyl (flutemetamol F 18 injection): Highlights of prescribing information. 2013, Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2014/203137s002lbl.pdf. Accessed June 4, 2014 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Highlights of prescribing information. Neuraceq (florbetaben F 18 injection), for intravenous use. 2013, Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2014/204677s000lbl.pdf. Accessed June 4, 2014 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | E.P. Klein, J. Kaye. Dementia specialists and early adoption. J Alzheimers Dis. 33: 2013; 445 – 450 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | A.M. Fagan. CSF biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease: Impact on disease concept, diagnosis, and clinical trial design. Adv Geriatr. 2014: 2014; 14, Article ID 302712 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | B.R. Matthews, B.L. Miller. Alzheimer’s disease The behavioral neurology of dementia. 2009; Cambridge University Press: New York; 56 – 73 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | P.M. Doraiswamy, R.A. Sperling, K. Johnson, E.M. Reiman, T.Z. Wong, M.N. Sabbagh, et al. AV45‐A11 Study Group. Florbetapir F 18 amyloid PET and 36‐month cognitive decline: A prospective multicenter study. Mol Psychiatry. 19: 2014; 1044 – 1051 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | S.M. Landau, M.A. Mintun, A.D. Joshi, R.A. Koeppe, R.C. Petersen, P.S. Aisen, et al. Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Amyloid deposition, hypometabolism, and longitudinal cognitive decline. Ann Neurol. 72: 2012; 578 – 586 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | C.H. Kawas, D.E. Greenia, S.S. Bullain, C.M. Clark, M.J. Pontecorvo, A.D. Joshi, et al. Amyloid imaging and cognitive decline in nondemented oldest‐old: The 90+ study. Alzheimers Dement. 9: 2013; 199 – 203 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | M. Grundman, M. Pontecorvo, S.P. Salloway, P.M. Doraiswamy, A.S. Fleisher, C.H. Sadowsky, et al. AV45‐A17 Study Group. Potential impact of amyloid imaging on diagnosis and intended management in patients with progressive cognitive decline. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 27: 2013; 4 – 15 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | R. Ossenkoeple, N.D. Prins, Y.A. Pijnenburg, A.W. Lemstra, W.M. van der Flier, S.F. Adriaanse, et al. Impact of molecular imaging on the diagnostic process in a memory clinic. Alzheimers Dement. 9: 2013; 414 – 421 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | C.M. Connell, J.S. Roberts, S.J. McLaughlin, B.D. Carpenter. Black and white adult family members’ attitudes toward a dementia diagnosis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 57: 2009; 1562 – 1568 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | M.M. Witte, J. Barnes, J. Lingler, M. Agronin, H. Hochstetler, K. Healey, et al. Testing the use of standardized scripts for disclosing “hypothetical/mock” amyloid PET scan results to nondemented cognitively‐impaired patients and their care partners. Alzheimers Dement. 9 (Suppl): 2013; P131 – P132 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | O. Karnieli‐Miller, P. Werner, J. Aharon‐Peretz, G. Sinoff, S. Eidelman. Expectations, experiences, and tensions in the memory clinic: The process of diagnosis disclosure of dementia within a triad. Int Psychogeriatr. 24: 2012; 1756 – 1770 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Dementia: Ethical issues. 2009, Available at: http://nuffieldbioethics.org/project/dementia/. Accessed June 4, 2014 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | M.A. Fischer, M.R. Stedman, J. Lii, C. Vogeli, W.H. Shrank, M.A. Brookhart, et al. Primary medication non‐adherence: Analysis of 195,930 electronic prescriptions. J Gen Intern Med. 25: 2010; 284 – 290 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | M.A. Nowrangi, V. Rao, C.G. Lyketsos. Epidemiology, assessment, and treatment of dementia. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 34: 2011; 275 – 294 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | A. Leuzy, S. Gauthier. Ethical issues in Alzheimer’s disease: An overview. Expert Rev Neurother. 12: 2012; 557 – 567 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | M. Storandt, J.C. Morris. Ascertainment bias in the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 67: 2010; 1364 – 1369 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Y. Stern. Cognitive reserve in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 11: 2012; 1006 – 1012 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | L.J. Trevena, B.J. Zikmund‐Fisher, A. Edwards, W. Gaissmaier, M. Galesic, P.K. Han, et al. Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: A risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 13 (Suppl 2): 2013; S7 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | S.M. Lee, K. Roen, A. Thornton. The psychological impact of a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Dementia (London). 13: 2014; 289 – 305 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | J.S. Roberts, K.D. Christensen, R.C. Green. Using Alzheimer’s disease as a model for genetic risk disclosure: Implications for personal genomics. Clinical Genetics. 80: 2011; 407 – 414 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | J.S. Roberts, L. Dunn, G. Rabinovici. Amyloid imaging, risk disclosure, and Alzheimer’s disease: Ethical and practical issues. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 3: 2013; 219 – 229 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | E.M. Mitsis, H.A. Bender, L. Kostakoglu, J. Machac, J. Martin, J.L. Woehr, et al. A consecutive case series experience with [18F] florbetapir PET imaging in an urban dementia center: Impact on quality of life, decision making, and disposition. Mol Neurodegener. 9: 2014; 10 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | R. Vandenberghe, K. Van Laere, A. Ivanoiu, E. Salmon, C. Bastin, E. Triau, et al. 18F‐flutemetamol amyloid imaging in Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment: A phase 2 trial. Ann Neurol. 68: 2010; 319 – 329 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | C.M. Clark, J.A. Schneider, B.J. Bedell, T.G. Beach, W.B. Bilker, M.A. Mintun, et al. Use of florbetapir‐PET for imaging beta‐amyloid pathology. JAMA. 305: 2011; 275 – 283 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | H. Barthel, H.J. Gertz, S. Dresel, O. Peters, P. Bartenstein, K. Buerger, et al. Cerebral amyloid‐β PET with florbetaben (18F) in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and healthy controls: A multicentre phase 2 diagnostic study. Lancet Neurol. 10: 2011; 424 – 435 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | W.E. Klunk. Amyloid imaging as a biomarker for cerebral beta‐amyloidosis and risk prediction for Alzheimer dementia. Neurobiol Aging. 32 (Suppl 1): 2011; S20 – S36 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | K.A. Johnson, S. Minoshima, N.I. Bohnen, K.J. Donohoe, N.L. Foster, P. Herscovitch, et al. Appropriate use criteria for amyloid PET: A report of the Amyloid Imaging Task Force, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and the Alzheimer’s Association. Alzheimers Dement. 54: 2013; 476 – 490 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | K.A. Johnson, S. Minoshima, N.I. Bohnen, K.J. Donohoe, N.L. Foster, P. Herscovitch, et al. Update on appropriate use criteria for amyloid PET imaging: Dementia experts, mild cognitive impairment, and education. Amyloid Imaging Task Force of the Alzheimer’s Association and Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. Alzheimers Dement. 9: 2013; e106 – e109 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | F.B. Waldorff, D.V. Buss, A. Eckermann, M.L. Rasmussen, N. Keiding, S. Rishøj, et al. Efficacy of psychosocial intervention in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease: The multicentre, rater blinded, randomised Danish Alzheimer Intervention Study (DAISY). BMJ. 345: 2012; e4693 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | W. Thies, L. Bleiler Alzheimer’s Association. 2013 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 9: 2013; 208 – 245 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | World Health Organization. Classifications: International classification of diseases, 10th revision. 2014, Available at: http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/index.html. Accessed June 4, 2014 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision. 2000; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | G.M. McKhann, D.S. Knopman, H. Chertkow, B.T. Hyman, C.R. Jack Jr., C.H. Kawas, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging‐Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 7: 2011; 263 – 269 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | T.G. Beach, S.E. Monsell, L.E. Phillips, W. Kukull. Accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease at National Institute on Aging Alzheimer Disease Centers, 2005‐2010. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 71: 2012; 266 – 273 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | T.G. Beach, L.I. Sue, D.G. Walker, M.N. Sabbagh, G. Serrano, B.N. Dugger, et al. Striatal amyloid plaque density predicts Braak neurofibrillary stage and clinicopathological Alzheimer’s disease: Implications for amyloid imaging. J Alzheimers Dis. 28: 2012; 869 – 876 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | S. Haneuse, E. Larson, R. Walker, T. Montine, J. Sonnen. Neuropathology‐based risk scoring for dementia diagnosis in the elderly. J Alzheimers Dis. 17: 2009; 875 – 885 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | D.S. Knopman, S.T. DeKosky, J.L. Cummings, H. Chui, J. Corey‐Bloom, N. Relkin, et al. Practice parameter: Diagnosis of dementia (an evidence‐based review). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 56: 2001; 1143 – 1153 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | B.E. Gay, K.I. Taylor, U. Hohl, M. Tolnay, H.B. Staehelin. The validity of clinical diagnoses of dementia in a group of consecutively autopsied memory clinic patients. J Nutr Health Aging. 12: 2008; 132 – 137 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | K.L. Newell, B.T. Hyman, J.H. Growdon, E.T. Hedley‐Whyte. Application of the National Institute on Aging (NIA)‐Reagan Institute criteria for the neuropathological diagnosis of Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 58: 1999; 1147 – 1155 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | M.S. Albert, S.T. DeKosky, D. Dickson, B. Dubois, H.H. Feldman, N.C. Fox, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging‐Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 7: 2011; 270 – 279 | |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.