Show simple item record

Development of a self-rated mixed methods skills assessment: The NIH Mixed Methods Research Training Program for the Health Sciences

dc.contributor.authorGuetterman, Timothy C.
dc.contributor.authorCreswell, John W.
dc.contributor.authorWittink, Marsha
dc.contributor.authorBarg, Fran K.
dc.contributor.authorCastro, Felipe G.
dc.contributor.authorDahlberg, Britt
dc.contributor.authorWatkins, Daphne C.
dc.contributor.authorDeutsch, Charles
dc.contributor.authorGallo, Joseph J.
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-13T19:37:40Z
dc.date.available2020-01-13T19:37:40Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, vol. 37, no. 2, 2017, pp. 76-82en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/153288
dc.description.abstractDemand for training in mixed methods is high, with little research on faculty development or assessment in mixed methods. We describe the development of a Self-Rated Mixed Methods Skills Assessment and provide validity evidence. The instrument taps six research domains: “Research question,” “Design/approach,” “Sampling,” “Data collection,” “Analysis,” and “Dissemination.” Respondents are asked to rate their ability to define or explain concepts of mixed methods under each domain, their ability to apply the concepts to problems, and the extent to which they need to improve.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Mixed Methods Research Training Program for the Health Sciences is supported by the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research under Grant R25MH104660-01.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipParticipating institutes for this project are the National Institute of Mental Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institute of Nursing Research, and the National Institute on Aging.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectProfessional developmenten_US
dc.subjectOutcomes assessmenten_US
dc.subjectMixed methods researchen_US
dc.subjectResearch trainingen_US
dc.subjectFaculty developmenten_US
dc.subjectOutcomes/impact assessmenten_US
dc.subjectSelf assessmenten_US
dc.subjectSurvey methodologyen_US
dc.subjectWorkforce development/issuesen_US
dc.titleDevelopment of a self-rated mixed methods skills assessment: The NIH Mixed Methods Research Training Program for the Health Sciencesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Work
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Family Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Social Worken_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Rochesteren_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Pennsylvaniaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherArizona State Universityen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherInstitute for Research, Chemical Heritage Foundationen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHarvard Universityen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherJohns Hopkins Universityen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/153288/1/Guetterman et al 2017_Development of a self-rated mixed methods skills assessment the NIH Mixed Methods Research Training Program for the Health Sciences.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/CEH.0000000000000152
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Continuing Education in the Health Professionsen_US
dc.owningcollnameSocial Work, School of (SSW)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.