Development of a self-rated mixed methods skills assessment: The NIH Mixed Methods Research Training Program for the Health Sciences
dc.contributor.author | Guetterman, Timothy C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Creswell, John W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Wittink, Marsha | |
dc.contributor.author | Barg, Fran K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Castro, Felipe G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Dahlberg, Britt | |
dc.contributor.author | Watkins, Daphne C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Deutsch, Charles | |
dc.contributor.author | Gallo, Joseph J. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-13T19:37:40Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-13T19:37:40Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, vol. 37, no. 2, 2017, pp. 76-82 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/153288 | |
dc.description.abstract | Demand for training in mixed methods is high, with little research on faculty development or assessment in mixed methods. We describe the development of a Self-Rated Mixed Methods Skills Assessment and provide validity evidence. The instrument taps six research domains: “Research question,” “Design/approach,” “Sampling,” “Data collection,” “Analysis,” and “Dissemination.” Respondents are asked to rate their ability to define or explain concepts of mixed methods under each domain, their ability to apply the concepts to problems, and the extent to which they need to improve. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | The Mixed Methods Research Training Program for the Health Sciences is supported by the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research under Grant R25MH104660-01. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Participating institutes for this project are the National Institute of Mental Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institute of Nursing Research, and the National Institute on Aging. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Professional development | en_US |
dc.subject | Outcomes assessment | en_US |
dc.subject | Mixed methods research | en_US |
dc.subject | Research training | en_US |
dc.subject | Faculty development | en_US |
dc.subject | Outcomes/impact assessment | en_US |
dc.subject | Self assessment | en_US |
dc.subject | Survey methodology | en_US |
dc.subject | Workforce development/issues | en_US |
dc.title | Development of a self-rated mixed methods skills assessment: The NIH Mixed Methods Research Training Program for the Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Social Work | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Department of Family Medicine | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | School of Social Work | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | University of Rochester | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | University of Pennsylvania | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Arizona State University | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Institute for Research, Chemical Heritage Foundation | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Harvard University | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Johns Hopkins University | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/153288/1/Guetterman et al 2017_Development of a self-rated mixed methods skills assessment the NIH Mixed Methods Research Training Program for the Health Sciences.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000152 | |
dc.identifier.source | Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Social Work, School of (SSW) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.