Show simple item record

Factors Influencing Pediatric Dental Program Directorsâ Selection of Residents and Demographics of Current Directors

dc.contributor.authorMajewski, Robert F.
dc.contributor.authorFonseca, Marcio A.
dc.contributor.authorDeVries, Eric S.
dc.contributor.authorHu, Jan C.
dc.contributor.authorMurdoch‐kinch, Carol Anne
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-05T15:05:10Z
dc.date.available2020-02-05T15:05:10Z
dc.date.issued2009-03
dc.identifier.citationMajewski, Robert F.; Fonseca, Marcio A.; DeVries, Eric S.; Hu, Jan C.; Murdoch‐kinch, Carol Anne (2009). "Factors Influencing Pediatric Dental Program Directorsâ Selection of Residents and Demographics of Current Directors." Journal of Dental Education 73(3): 338-344.
dc.identifier.issn0022-0337
dc.identifier.issn1930-7837
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/153594
dc.description.abstractThe primary goal of this study was to examine the criteria that influence rankings of candidates by advanced education program directors in pediatric dentistry. Secondary objectives were to obtain information on the resident selection process and to explore demographics of current program directors. A survey was sent in 2005 to all sixtyâ three program directors of pediatric dentistry residency programs accredited within the United States for the graduating class of 2007. The survey had a response rate of almost 78 percent (49/63). Respondents were requested to rank the importance of eleven factors that are typically included in the selection criteria for pediatric dentistry residents. Factors were rated on a scale of critical, very important, fairly important, somewhat important, and not important. The four highest ranked criteria by program directors were the following, in order: National Board scores, dental school clinical grades, class rank, and grade point average (GPA). Other factors ranked in descending order of perceived importance were the following: dental school basic science grades, experience in pediatric dentistry, extracurricular activities, completion of a general practice residency or advanced education in general dentistry program, the application essay, a publication or professional presentation, and private practice experience. All directors ranked personal interviews as very important to critical. Letters of recommendation from a pediatric dentistry department chairperson or faculty member were viewed more favorably than letters from dental school deans and nonâ pediatric dentistry faculty. Fiftyâ seven percent of the directors responding (28/49) were male, and 81 percent (40/49) were white, nonâ Hispanic. Fiftyâ nine percent of the directors (29/49) graduated from a residency program over twenty years ago, with 39 percent (19/49) having been a director for less than five years.
dc.publisherAmerican Dental Education Association
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherdemographics
dc.subject.othertrends
dc.subject.otherpediatric dental residency
dc.subject.otherpediatric dentistry
dc.subject.otherdental education
dc.subject.othermatch
dc.titleFactors Influencing Pediatric Dental Program Directorsâ Selection of Residents and Demographics of Current Directors
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/153594/1/jddj002203372009733tb04706x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/j.0022-0337.2009.73.3.tb04706.x
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Dental Education
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeLisa JA, Jain SS, Campagnolo DI. Factors used by physical medicine and rehabilitation residency training directors to select their residents. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 73 ( 3 ): 152 â 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarshall JR, Crowder M, Rice DG. Selection of psychiatric residents: an overview. J Nerv Ment Dis 1972; 155 ( 6 ): 436 â 42.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePharris JL, Van Cleve HP. The personal interview for applicant selection. J Fam Pract 1977; 4 ( 2 ): 377 â 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWagoner NE, Gray GT. Report on a survey of program directors regarding selection factors in graduate medical education. J Med Educ 1979; 54: 455 â 2.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWagoner NE, Suriano JR, Stoner JA. Factors used by program directors to select residents. J Med Educ 1986; 61: 10 â 21.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWagoner NE, Suriano JR. Recommendations for changing the residency selection process based on a survey of program directors. Acad Med 1992; 76 ( 7 ): 459 â 64.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWagoner NE, Suriano JR. Program directorsâ responses to a survey in variables used to select residents in a time of change. Acad Med 1999; 74 ( 1 ): 51 â 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGordon M, Lincoln JA. Selecting a few residents from many applicants: a new way to be fair and efficient. J Med Educ 1976; 51: 454 â 60.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeichner P, Eusebioâ Torres E, Harper D. The validity of reference letters in predicting resident performance. J Med Educ 1981; 56 ( 12 ): 1019 â 21.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoss CA, Leichner P. Criteria for selecting residents: a reassessment. Can J Psychiatry 1984; 29 ( 8 ): 681 â 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGong H, Parker NH, Apgar FA, Shank C. Influence of the interview on ranking in the residency selection process. Med Educ 1984; 18: 366 â 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZagumny MJ, Rudolph J. Comparing medical studentsâ and residency directorsâ ratings of criteria used to select residents. Acad Med 1992; 67 ( 9 ): 613.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCollister RJ. The use of part I National Board scores in the selection of residents in ophthalmology and otolaryngology. JAMA 1988; 259 ( 2 ): 240 â 2.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCurtis DJ, Riordan DD, Cruess DF, Brower AC. Selecting radiology resident candidates. Invest Radiol 1989; 24 ( 4 ): 324 â 30.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGayed N. Residency directorsâ assessments of which selection criteria best predict the performances of foreignâ born foreign medical graduates during internal medicine residencies. Acad Med 1991; 66 ( 11 ): 699 â 701.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrantham JR. Radiology resident selection: results of a survey. Invest Radiol 1993; 28 ( 1 ): 99 â 101.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBernstein AD, Jazrawi LM, Elbeshbeshy B, Della Valle CJ, Zuckerman JD. An analysis of orthopaedic residency selection criteria. Hosp Joint Dis (Bulletin) 2002â 2003; 61 ( 1&2 ): 49 â 57.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePoirier MP, Pruitt CW. Factors used by pediatric emergency medicine program directors to select their fellows. Pediatr Emerg Care 2003; 19 ( 3 ): 157 â 61.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrantsve LM, Laskin DM, Auerbach SM. Personality and gender influences on faculty ratings and rankings of oral and maxillofacial surgery residency applicants. J Dent Educ 2003; 67 ( 11 ): 1252 â 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpina A, Smith T, Marciani R, Marshall E. A survey of resident selection procedures in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 58: 660 â 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceda Fonseca MA, Pollock M, Majewski R, Tootla R, Murdochâ Kinch CA. Factors influencing candidatesâ choice of a pediatric dental residency program. J Dent Educ 2007; 71 ( 9 ): 1194 â 202.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeaver RG, Chmar JE, Haden NK, Valachovic RW. Annual ADEA survey of dental school seniors: 2004 graduating class. J Dent Educ 2005; 69 ( 5 ): 595 â 619.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJoint Commission on National Dental Examinations, American Dental Association. Update on the National Board Dental Examination. Chicago: American Dental Association, 2008.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClemente M, Michener MW. The dean’s letter of recommendation and internship performance. J Med Educ 1976; 51 ( 7, Pt 1 ): 590 â 2.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHunt DD, Maclaren CF, Carline J. Comparing assessments of medical studentsâ potentials as residents made by the residency directors and deans at two schools. Acad Med 1991; 66 ( 6 ): 340 â 4.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwanson AG, Tudor CG. The experience of medical students in obtaining a residency (supplement). AAMC Graduation Questionnaire. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges, October 1986.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCasamassimo PS, Feigal R, Adair SM, Berg J, Stewart R. A snapshot of the U.S. postdoctoral pediatric dentistry faculty workforce, 2002. J Dent Educ 2004; 68 ( 8 ): 823 â 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWaldman HB. Would you believe that during the 1990s applications to pediatric dental training programs more than doubled? J Dent Child 2000; 67 ( 6 ): 425 â 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Harrison R. Simple questionnaire studies. J Contin Educ Health Prof 1997; 17: 228 â 38.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIsharani SJ, Litch CS, Romberg E, Wells A, Rutkauskas JS. Demographics and quality profile of applicants to pediatric dentistry residencies. Pediatr Dent 2006; 28 ( 5 ): 425 â 30.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.