View Item 

Show simple item record

Should Lecture Recordings Be Mandated in Dental Schools? Two Viewpoints
dc.contributor.authorZandona, Andrea Ferreira
dc.contributor.authorKinney, Janet
dc.contributor.authorSeong, WookJin
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Vandana
dc.contributor.authorBendayan, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorHewlett, Edmond
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-05T15:07:36Z
dc.date.available2020-02-05T15:07:36Z
dc.date.issued2016-12
dc.identifier.citationZandona, Andrea Ferreira; Kinney, Janet; Seong, WookJin; Kumar, Vandana; Bendayan, Alexander; Hewlett, Edmond (2016). "Should Lecture Recordings Be Mandated in Dental Schools? Two Viewpoints." Journal of Dental Education 80(12): 1468-1473.
dc.identifier.issn0022-0337
dc.identifier.issn1930-7837
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/153701
dc.publisherAmerican Dental Education Association
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherlecture recording
dc.subject.otherdental education
dc.subject.otherteaching method
dc.subject.othereducational technology
dc.subject.othercomputer‐assisted instruction
dc.subject.otherpodcast
dc.titleShould Lecture Recordings Be Mandated in Dental Schools? Two Viewpoints
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/153701/1/jddj0022033720168012tb06235x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/j.0022-0337.2016.80.12.tb06235.x
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Dental Education
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavidson L.A.. The end of print: digitization and its consequence—revolutionary changes in scholarly and social communication and in scientific research. Int J Toxicol 2005; 24 ( 1 ): 25 – 34.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCann A.L., Schneiderman E.D., Hinton R.J.. E‐teaching and learning preferences of dental and dental hygiene students. J Dent Educ 2010; 74 ( 1 ): 65 – 78.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZazulia A.R., Goldhoff P.. Faculty and medical student attitudes about preclinical classroom attendance. Teach Learn Med 2014; 26 ( 4 ): 327 – 34.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMattick K., Crocker G., Bligh J.. Medical student attendance at non‐compulsory lectures. Adv Health Sci Educ 2007; 12 ( 2 ): 201 – 10.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBillings‐Gagliardi S., Mazor K.M.. Student decisions about lecture attendance: do electronic course materials matter? Acad Med 2007; 82 ( 10 ): S73 – 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGupta A., Saks N.S.. Exploring medical student decisions regarding attending live lectures and using recorded lectures. Med Teacher 2013; 35 ( 9 ): 767 – 71.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBacro T.R., Gebregziabher M., Fitzharris T.P.. Evaluation of a lecture recording system in a medical curriculum. Anat Sci Educ 2010; 3 ( 6 ): 300 – 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoynton J.R., Johnson L.A., Nainar S.H., Hu J.C.. Portable digital video instruction in predoctoral education of child behavior management. J Dent Educ 2007; 71 ( 4 ): 545 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRichardson D.. Student perceptions and learning outcomes of computer‐assisted versus traditional instruction in physiology. Am J Physiol 1997; 273 ( 6 Pt 3 ): S55 – 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen M., Horrocks E., Evans R.. Video versus lecture: effective alternatives for orthodontic auxiliary training. J Orthod 1998; 25 ( 3 ): 191 – 5.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePaul S., Pusic M., Gillespie C.. Medical student lecture attendance versus iTunes U. Med Educ 2015; 49 ( 5 ): 530 – 1.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSolomon D.J., Ferenchick G.S., Laird‐Fick H.S., Kavanaugh K.. A randomized trial comparing digital and live lecture formats. BMC Med Educ 2004; 4 ( 1 ): 27.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams C., Aubin S., Harkin P., Cottrell D.. A randomized, controlled, single‐blind trial of teaching provided by a computer‐based multimedia package versus lecture. Med Educ 2001; 35 ( 9 ): 847 – 54.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWakabayashi N.. [Flipped classroom as a strategy to enhance active learning]. J Stomatol Soc Japan 2015; 81: 1 – 7. [in Japanese]
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcGowan J., Abrams M., Frank M., Bangert M., eds. Creating a virtual community of learning predicated on medical student learning styles: AMIA annual symposium proceedings. Bethesda, MD: American Medical Informatics Association, 2003.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaek S., Im S.J., Lee S.H. et al. Instructional analysis of lecture video recording and its application for quality improvement of medical lectures. Korean J Med Educ 2011; 23 ( 4 ): 263 – 74.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson L., Grayden S.. Podcasts: an emerging form of digital publishing. Int J Comput Dent 2006; 9 ( 3 ): 205 – 18.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaynor L.M., Barrickman A.L., Stamatakis M.K., Elliott D.P.. Student and faculty perceptions of lecture recording in a doctor of pharmacy curriculum. Am J Pharm Educ 2013; 77 ( 8 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarchand J.P., Pearson M.L., Albon S.P.. Student and faculty member perspectives on lecture capture in pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ 2014; 78 ( 4 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSoong S.K.A., Chan L.K., Cheers C., Hu C.. Impact of videorecorded lectures among students. Who’s Learning 2006: 789 – 93.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWestrick S.C., Helms K.L., McDonough S.K., Breland M.L.. Factors influencing pharmacy students’ attendance decisions in large lectures. Am J Pharm Educ 2009; 73 ( 5 ): 1.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceProber C.G., Heath C.. Lecture halls without lectures: a proposal for medical education. N Engl J Med 2012; 366 ( 18 ): 1657 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBickerdike S., Whittle S.R., Pickering J.D.. Do lecture audiorecordings support engagement and flexible learning? Med Educ 2014; 48 ( 5 ): 522 – 3.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMair J.. Who owns the information in the medical record? Copyright issues. Health Inform Manag J 2011; 40 ( 3 ): 31.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaking lectures unmissable! Tomorrow’s Professor eNewsletter, Stanford Center for Teaching and Learning. At: cgistanfordedu/~dept‐ctl/cgi‐bin/tomprof/enewsletterphp?msgno=1365. Accessed 21 Apr. 2016.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFreeman S., Eddy S.L., McDonough M. et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2014; 111 ( 23 ): 8410 – 5.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllen K.L., Katz R.V.. Comparative use of podcasts vs. lecture transcripts as learning aids for dental students. J Dent Educ 2011; 75 ( 6 ): 817 – 22.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKalludi S.N., Punja D., Pai K.M., Dhar M.. Efficacy and perceived utility of podcasts as a supplementary teaching aid among first‐year dental students. Australas Med J 2013; 6 ( 9 ): 450.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTwenge J.M.. Generational changes and their impact in the classroom: teaching generation me. Med Educ 2009; 43 ( 5 ): 398 – 405.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrittain S., Glowacki P., Van Ittersum J., Johnson L.. Podcasting lectures. Educause Q 2006; 3 ( 24 ): 10.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHorvath Z., O’Donnell J.A., Johnson L.A. et al. Use of lecture recordings in dental education: assessment of status quo and recommendations. J Dent Educ 2013; 77 ( 11 ): 1431 – 42.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePark S.E., Howell T.H.. Implementation of a flipped classroom educational model in a predoctoral dental course. J Dent Educ 2015; 79 ( 5 ): 563 – 70.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchleyer T.K., Thyvalikakath T.P., Spallek H. et al. From information technology to informatics: the information revolution in dental education. J Dent Educ 2012; 76 ( 1 ): 142 – 53.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBreckler J., Joun D., Ngo H.. Learning styles of physiology students interested in the health professions. Adv Physiol Educ 2009; 33 ( 1 ): 30 – 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurphy R.J., Gray S.A., Straja S.R., Bogert M.C.. Student learning preferences and teaching implications. J Dent Educ 2004; 68 ( 8 ): 859 – 66.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePilcher E.S.. Students’ evaluation of online course materials in fixed prosthodontics: a case study. Eur J Dent Educ 2001; 5 ( 2 ): 53 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCardall S., Krupat E., Ulrich M.. Live lecture versus videorecorded lecture: are students voting with their feet? Acad Med 2008; 83 ( 12 ): 1174 – 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlein K.P., Hannum W.H., Fields H.W., Proffit W.R.. Interactive distance learning in orthodontic residency programs: problems and potential solutions. J Dent Educ 2012; 76 ( 3 ): 322 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKunin M., Julliard K.N., Rodriguez T.E.. Comparing face‐to‐face, synchronous, and asynchronous learning: postgraduate dental resident preferences. J Dent Educ 2014; 78 ( 6 ): 856 – 66.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jddj0022033720168012tb06235x.pdf
Size:
231.8KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.