View Item 

Show simple item record

What Do Dental Students Think About Mandatory Laptop Programs?
dc.contributor.authorHendricson, William
dc.contributor.authorEisenberg, Elise
dc.contributor.authorGuest, Gary
dc.contributor.authorJones, Pamela
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Lynn
dc.contributor.authorPanagakos, Fotinos
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, James
dc.contributor.authorCintron, Laura
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-05T15:08:42Z
dc.date.available2020-02-05T15:08:42Z
dc.date.issued2006-05
dc.identifier.citationHendricson, William; Eisenberg, Elise; Guest, Gary; Jones, Pamela; Johnson, Lynn; Panagakos, Fotinos; McDonald, James; Cintron, Laura (2006). "What Do Dental Students Think About Mandatory Laptop Programs?." Journal of Dental Education 70(5): 480-499.
dc.identifier.issn0022-0337
dc.identifier.issn1930-7837
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/153745
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherAmerican Dental Education Association
dc.subject.otherfaculty development
dc.subject.otheronline education
dc.subject.otherinstructional technology
dc.subject.otherdental education
dc.titleWhat Do Dental Students Think About Mandatory Laptop Programs?
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/153745/1/jddj002203372006705tb04103x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/j.0022-0337.2006.70.5.tb04103.x
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Dental Education
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDePaola D.P., Slavkin H.C. Reforming dental health professions education: a white paper. J Dent Educ 2004; 68 ( 11 ): 1139 – 50.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBates A.W. Managing technological change. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass, 2000.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrookfield S. Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass, 1995.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFord P., Goodyear P., Heseltine R., Lewis R., Darby J., et al. Managing change in higher education: a learning environment architecture. Buckingham, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, 1996.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDarby J. E‐learning as a change agent. Int J Comp Internet Management 2004; 12 ( 2 ): 171 – 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBland C.J., Starnamann S., Wersal L. Curricular change in medical schools: how to succeed. Acad Med 2000; 75: 575 – 94.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePalloff R.M., Pratt K. Beyond the looking glass: what faculty and students need to be successful online. In: Rudestam K.E., Schoenholtz‐Read J., eds. Handbook of online learning. London: Sage Publications, 2004: 171 – 84.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTedesco L.A. Issues in dental curriculum and change. J Dent Educ 1995; 59: 97 – 147.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHendricson W., Cohen P. Future directions in dental school curriculum, teaching, and learning. In: Haden K., Tedesco L. Leadership for the future: the dental school in the university. Washington, DC: American Association of Dental Schools, Center for Educational Policy and Research, 1999: 37 – 62.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHendricson W.D., Cohen P.A. Oral health care in the 21 st century: implications for dental and medical education. Acad Med 2001; 77 ( 12 ): 1181 – 206.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBertolami C.N. Rationalizing the dental curriculum in light of current disease prevalence and patient demand for treatment: form vs. content. J Dent Educ 2001; 65 ( 8 ): 725 – 735.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMendonca E.A. Clinical decision support systems: perspectives in dentistry. J Dent Educ 2004; 68 ( 6 ): 589 – 97.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBehar‐Horenstein L.S., Mitchell G.S., Dolan T.A. A case study examining classroom instructional practices at a U.S. dental school. J Dent Educ 2005; 69 ( 6 ): 639 – 48.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSilberman S.L., Cain M.J., Mahan J.M. Dental students’ personality: a Jungian perspective. J Dent Educ 1982; 46 ( 11 ): 646 – 51.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSuddick R.P., Herbert R.J., DeMaris D.M., Personality traits of dental students as determined by the clinical analysis questionnaire. Paper presented at the International Association of Dental Research/American Association for Dental Research, Las Vegas, Nevada, March 21, 1985.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerlocher W.C., Hendricson W.D. Student and faculty learning styles. J Dent Educ 1985; 49 ( 10 ): 684 – 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHendricson W.D., Berlocher W.C., Herbert R.J. A four‐year longitudinal study of dental student learning styles. J Dent Educ 1987; 51 ( 4 ): 175 – 81.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurphy R.J., Gray S.A., Straja S.R., Bogert M.C. Student learning preferences and teaching implications. J Dent Educ 2004; 68 ( 8 ): 859 – 66.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZemsky R., Massey W.F. Thwarted innovation: what happened to e‐learning and why. A final report for the WeatherStation Project. West Chester, PA: The Learning Alliance for Higher Education at the University of Pennsylvania, 2004. At: www.irhe.upenn.edu/WeatherStation.html. Accessed: January 2006.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSzulanski G. The process of knowledge transfer: a diachronic analysis of success. Org Behav Hum Decision Processes 2000; 82 ( 1 ): 9 – 27.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTyre M.J., Orlikowski W.J. Windows of opportunity: temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organization. Org Sci 1994; 5 ( 1 ): 98 – 118.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZucker L.G. The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. Am Sociol Rev 1977; 42: 726 – 43.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSzulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strat Management J 1996; 17: 27 – 43.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlbanese M.A., Mitchell S. Problem‐based learning: a review of the literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Acad Med 1993; 68: 52 – 81.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerkson L. Problem‐based learning: have the expectations been met? Acad Med 1993; 68 ( 10 Suppl ): S79 – S88.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVernon D.T.A., Blake R.L. Does problem‐based learning work? A meta‐analysis of evaluative research. Acad Med 1993; 68: 550 – 63.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaarinen‐Rahiika H., Binkley J.M. Problem‐based learning in physical therapy: a review of the literature and overview of the McMaster University experience. Phys Ther 1998; 78: 195 – 207.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHendricson W.D., Panagakos F., Eisenberg E., Guest G., Jones P., Johnson L., et al. Electronic curriculum implementation at North American dental schools. J Dent Educ 2004; 68 ( 10 ): 1041 – 57.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKassebaum D., Hendricson W., Taft T., Haden K. The dental curriculum at North American dental institutions in 2002–03: a survey of current structure, recent innovations, and planned changes. J Dent Educ 2004; 67 ( 9 ): 914 – 31.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndrews K.G., Demps E.L. Distance education in the U.S. and Canadian undergraduate dental curriculum. J Dent Educ 2003; 67 ( 4 ): 427 – 38.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenberg H., Grad H.A., Matear D.W. The effectiveness of computer‐aided, self‐instructional programs in dental education: a systematic review of the literature. J Dent Educ 2003; 67 ( 5 ): 524 – 32.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen H.B., Walker S.R., Tenenbaum H.C., Spero L. Interdisciplinary, web‐based, self‐study interactive programs in the dental undergraduate program: a pilot. J Dent Educ 2003; 67 ( 6 ): 661 – 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLittlefield J.H., Demps E.L., Keiser K., Chatterjee L., Yuan C.H., Hargreaves K.M. A multimedia patient simulation for teaching and assessing endodontic diagnosis. J Dent Educ 2003; 67 ( 6 ): 669 – 77.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchleyer T.K.L. Dental informatics: an emerging biomedical informatics discipline. J Dent Educ 2003; 67 ( 11 ): 1193 – 1200.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson L.A., Schleyer T.K.L. Developing high‐quality educational software. J Dent Educ 2003; 67 ( 11 ): 1209 – 20.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchleyer T.K.L., Johnson L.A. Evaluation of educational software. J Dent Educ 2003; 67 ( 11 ): 1221 – 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGray S.A., Deem L.P., Sisson J.A., Hammrich P.L. The predictive utility of computer‐simulated exercises for pre‐clinical technique performance. J Dent Educ 2003; 67 ( 11 ): 1229 – 33.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbbey L.M., Arnold P., Halunko L., Huneke M., Lee S. Case studies for dentistry: development of a tool to author interactive, multimedia, computer‐based patient simulations. J Dent Educ 2003; 67 ( 12 ): 1345 – 4.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGordon J.S., Severson H.H., Seeley J.R., Christiansen S. Development and evaluation of an interactive tobacco cessation CD‐ROM educational program for dental students. J Dent Educ 2004; 68 ( 3 ): 361 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeBlanc V.R., Urbankova A., Hadavi F., Lichtenthal R.M. A preliminary study in using virtual reality to train dental students. J Dent Educ 2004; 68 ( 3 ): 378 – 83.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim S., Mouradian W.E., Leggott P.J., Schaad D.C., Shaul C. Implications for designing online oral health resources: a review of fifty‐six websites. J Dent Educ 2004; 68 ( 6 ): 633 – 43.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlson B.L., McDonald J.L., Influence of online formative assessment upon student learning in biomedical science courses. J Dent Educ 2004; 68 ( 6 ): 656 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBogacki R.E., Best A., Abbey L.M. Equivalence study of a dental anatomy computer‐assisted learning program. J Dent Educ 2004; 68 ( 8 ): 867 – 71.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJasinevicius T.R., Landers M., Nelson S., Urbankova A. An evaluation of two dental simulation systems: virtual reality versus contemporary non‐computer‐assisted. J Dent Educ 2004; 68 ( 11 ): 1151 – 62.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoberick K. Creating a web‐enhanced interactive preclinic technique manual: case report and student response. J Dent Educ 2004; 68 ( 12 ): 1245 – 57.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuchanan J.A. Experience with virtual reality‐based technology in teaching restorative dental procedures. J Dent Educ 2004; 68 ( 12 ): 1258 – 65.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoltzman J.M., Elliot N., Biber C.L., Sanders R.M. Computerized assessment of dental student writing skills. J Dent Educ 2004; 69 ( 2 ): 285 – 95.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson J.T. Creating learner‐centered classrooms: use of an audience response system in pediatric dentistry education. J Dent Educ 2004; 69 ( 3 ): 378 – 81.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRajab L.D., Baqain Z.H. Use of information and communication technology among dental students at the University of Jordan. J Dent Educ 2004; 69 ( 3 ): 387 – 98.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolyfield L.J., Bolin K.A., Rankin K.V., Shulman J.D., Jones D.L., Despain Eden B. Use of computer technology to modify objective structured clinical examinations. J Dent Educ 2004; 69 ( 10 ): 1133 – 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCurry M., Smith L. Twelve tips for authoring online distance learning medical post‐registration programmes. Med Teach 2005; 27 ( 4 ): 316 – 21.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBillings D., Connors H., Skiba D. Benchmarking best practices in web‐based nursing courses. Adv Nurs Sci 2001; 23: 41 – 52.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKulik C.C., Kulik J.A. Effectiveness of computer‐based instruction: an updated analysis. Comp Hum Behav 1991; 7: 75 – 94.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChumley‐Jones H., Dobbie A., Alford C. Web‐based learning: sound educational method or hype? A review of the evaluation literature. Acad Med 2002; 77 ( 10 ): S86 – S93.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBissell V., McKerlie R.A., Kinanae D.F., McHugh S. Teaching periodontal pocket depth charting to dental students: a comparison of computer‐assisted learning and traditional tutorials. Br Dent J 2003; 195 ( 6 ): 333 – 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAly M., Elen J., Willems G. Instructional multimedia program versus standard lecture: a comparison of two methods for teaching the undergraduate orthodontic curriculum. Eur J Dent Educ 2004; 8 ( 1 ): 43 – 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConover W.J. Practical nonparametric statistics. 2 nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1980.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jddj002203372006705tb04103x.pdf
Size:
136.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.