Show simple item record

Tit for Tat and Beyond: The Legendary Work of Anatol Rapoport

dc.contributor.authorKopelman, Shirli
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-05T15:09:11Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHS
dc.date.available2020-02-05T15:09:11Z
dc.date.issued2020-02
dc.identifier.citationKopelman, Shirli (2020). "Tit for Tat and Beyond: The Legendary Work of Anatol Rapoport." Negotiation and Conflict Management Research 13(1): 60-84.
dc.identifier.issn1750-4708
dc.identifier.issn1750-4716
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/153763
dc.description.abstractThis article pays tribute to Anatol Rapoport. Rapoport’s contributions spanned scientific disciplines and included the application of mathematical models to biology and the social sciences, alongside metatheoretical work bridging semantics, ethics, and philosophy. Known for formulating the “Tit for Tat” strategy, his approach to game theory reflected a nuanced understanding of knowledge, wisdom, and ethics; the differences, for example, between modeling behavior—what works as an algorithm in a structured game—and solving complex human social interactions. While developing a science of human conflict, Rapoport focused on simple ideas to promote cooperation; his ultimate goal was to foster world peace. A career overview alongside testimonials by scholars and family provide a glimpse of Anatol Rapoport, the scientist and the person. The legacy and thinking of Anatol Rapoport continue to resonate and reverberate today whenever we conduct rigorous scholarship toward transforming conflict into peaceful harmony, whether among people or nations.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherBasic Books
dc.subject.othergeneral systems theory
dc.subject.othersemantics
dc.subject.otherethics
dc.subject.otherPrisoner’s Dilemma
dc.subject.otherTit for Tat
dc.subject.otherconflict
dc.subject.othercooperation
dc.subject.otherpeace
dc.titleTit for Tat and Beyond: The Legendary Work of Anatol Rapoport
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelLaw and Legal Studies
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelGovernment Information and Law
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/153763/1/ncmr12172.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/153763/2/ncmr12172_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ncmr.12172
dc.identifier.sourceNegotiation and Conflict Management Research
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 2000 ). Certainties and doubts: A philosophy of life. Montreal, QC: Black Rose Books.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A., & Chammah, A. M. ( 1965b ). Sex differences in factors contributing to the level of cooperation in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 831 – 838. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022678
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A., & Chammah, A. M. ( 1966 ). The game of chicken. The American Behavioral Scientist, 10 ( 3 ), 10 – 28. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276426601000303
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A., Chammah, A., Dwyer, J., & Gyr, J. ( 1962 ). Three‐person non‐zero‐sum nonnegotiable games. Behavioral science, 7, 38 – 58. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830070103
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A., & Dale, P. ( 1966a ). Models for Prisoner’s Dilemma. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 3 ( 2 ), 269 – 286. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(66)90016-2
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A., & Dale, P. S. ( 1966b ). The “end” and “start” effects in iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 10, 363 – 366. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200276601000308
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A., Diekmann, A., & Franzen, A. ( 1995a ). Experiments with social traps III: Breakup of coalitions. Rationality and Society, 7, 328 – 337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463195007003006
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A., Diekmann, A., & Franzen, A. ( 1995b ). Experiments with social traps IV: Reputation effects in the evolution of cooperation. Rationality and Society, 7, 431 – 441. https://doi.org/10.1177/104346319500700407
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A., Frenkel, O., & Perner, J. ( 1977 ). Experiments with cooperative 2 × 2 games. Theory and Decision, 8 ( 1 ), 67 – 92. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133087
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A., Guyer, M. J., & Gordon, D. G. ( 1976 ). The 2x2 game. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. (Anatol), & Rapoport, A. (Anthony). ( 1992 ). Canada and the world: Agenda for the last decade of the millennium. Toronto, ON: Science for Peace, Samuel Stevens & Co.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. (Anatol), Rapoport, A. (Amnon), Livant, W., & Boyd, J. ( 1966 ). A study of lexical graphs. Foundations of Language, 2, 338 – 376. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25000244
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A., & Shimbel, A. ( 1947 ). Suggested experimental procedures for determining the satisfaction function of animals. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 9 ( 4 ), 169 – 77. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02478308
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRome, A. ( 2013 ). The genius of Earth Day: How a 1970 teach‐In unexpectedly made the first green generation. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchelling, T. C. ( 1956 ). An essay on bargaining. American Economic Review, 46 ( 3 ), 281 – 306.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchelling, T. C. ( 1958 ). The strategy of conflict: Prospectus for the reorientation of game theory. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2 ( 3 ), 203 – 264. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200301
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchelling, T. C. ( 1960 ). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwaninger, M. ( 2007 ). Obituary Anatol Rapoport (May 22, 1911–January 20, 2007): Pioneer of systems theory and peace research, mathematician, philosopher and pianist. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 24, 655 – 658. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.833
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShapley, L. S. ( 1953 ). A value for n‐person games. In H. W. Kuhn & A. W. Tucker (Eds.), Contributions to the theory of games, II (annals of mathematics studies, 28) (pp. 307 – 317 ). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShubik, M. ( 1964 ). Game theory and related approaches to social behavior. New York, NY: Wiley.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimpson, E. ( 2016 ). The contributions of Anatol Rapoport to Game Theory. Political Science Publications, 135. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/politicalsciencepub/135
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSuppes, P., & Attkinson, R. C. ( 1960 ). Markov learning models for multiperson interactions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTobin, J. ( 2019, September 25). The Prisoner’s Dilemma. University of Michigan Heritage Project. Retrieved from https://heritage.umich.edu/stories/the‐prisoners‐dilemma/
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams, J. D. ( 1954 ). The complete strategist. New York, NY: McGraw‐ill.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZweig, S. ( 1942 ). Die welt von gestern. Zurich: Willams Verlag [English translation by Anthea Bell in 2009: The world of yesterday. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press ].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKorzybski, A. ( 1933 ). Science and sanity: An introduction to non‐Aristotelian systems and general semantics. Lancaster, PA: The International Non‐Aristotelian Library Pub. Co.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAxelrod, R. ( 1980a, March). Effective choice in the prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24 ( 1 ), 3 – 25. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200278002400101
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAxelrod, R. ( 1980b, Sep.). More effective choice in the prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24, 379 – 403. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200278002400301
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAxelrod, R. ( 1984 ). The evolution of cooperation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBen‐Artzi, R., Cristal, M., & Kopelman, S. ( 2015 ). Conceptualizing conflict management and conflict resolution as distinct negotiation processes in the context of the enduring Israeli‐Palestinian conflict. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 8 ( 1 ), 56 – 63. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12046
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoulding, J. R., Clements, K. P., Morrison, M. L., & Strimling Yodsampa, A. ( 2016 ). Elise Boulding’s legacy to the twenty‐first century: reflections on her contributions to understanding conflict and peace. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 9 ( 4 ), 274 – 291. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12078
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBraithwaite, R. B. ( 1955 ). Theory of games as a tool for the moral philosopher. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCull, P. ( 2007 ). The mathematical biophysics of Nicolas Rashevsky. BioSystems, 88 ( 3 ), 178 – 184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2006.11.003
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeutsch, M. ( 1958 ). Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2 ( 4 ), 265 – 279. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200401
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiekmann, A. ( 1984 ). Freiwilligendilemma. Working paper 206, Institute for Advanced Studies Vienna, February 1984.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiekmann, A. ( 1985 ). Volunteer’s dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 29, 605 – 610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002785029004003
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiekmann, A., & Mitter, P. (Eds.) ( 1986 ). Paradoxical effects of social behavior: Essays in honor of Anatol Rapoport. Wien and Heidelberg, Germany: Physica‐Verlag.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEckhardt, W. ( 1983 ). Anatol Rapoport: Critic of peace research. Peace Research, 15 ( 3 ), 43 – 51. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23609790
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFlood, M. M. ( 1952 ). Some experimental games. U.S. Air Force Project RAND Research Memorandum RM‐789‐1‐PR revised June 20, 1952, Santa Monica, CA. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM789-1.html
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGross, M. A. ( 2016 ). Legacies of scholars, scholarship, and praxis from the International Association for Conflict Management: Celebrating a lifetime of achievements. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 9 ( 4 ), 271 – 273. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12079.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGross, M.A. ( 2018 ). Transforming society from theory to practice: Celebrating the achievements of Rubin Award recipients from the International Association for Conflict Management. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 11, 111 – 114. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12124
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarsanyi, J. C. ( 1961 ). On the rationality postulates underlying the theory of cooperative games. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 5 ( 2 ), 179 – 196. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200276100500205
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarsanyi, J. C. ( 1962 ). Rationality postulates for bargaining solutions in cooperative and non‐cooperative games. Management Science, 9 ( 1 ), 141 – 153. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.9.1.141
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHayakawa, S. I. (Samuel Ichiyé). ( 1941 ). Language in action. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and company.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones, T. ( 1996 ). The President’s Corner, IACM Signal Newsletter, Volume 12, Number 1.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKopelman, S. ( 2009 ). The effect of culture and power on cooperation in commons dilemmas: Implications for global resource management. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108 ( 1 ), 153 – 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.06.004
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKopelman, S. ( 2014 ). Negotiating genuinely: Being yourself in business. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKopelman, S., Hardin, A. E., Myers, C. G., & Tost, L. P. ( 2016 ). Cooperation in multicultural negotiations: How the cultures of people with low and high power interact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 721 – 730. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000065
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLuce, R. D. ( 1959 ). On the possible psychophysical laws. Psychological Review, 66 ( 2 ), 81 – 95. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043178
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLuce, R. D., & Raiffa, H. ( 1957 ). Games and decisions: Introduction and critical survey. New York, NY: Wiley.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorain, L., Morain, M., Johnson, W., & Rapoport, A. ( 1963 ). On the completion of twenty years of ETC. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 20, 389 – 394. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42582215
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorrison, H. ( 1970, March 15). Panel held on war an ecology. The Michigan Daily, 80 ( 134 ), 3. https://digital.bentley.umich.edu/midaily/mdp.39015071754035/491
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNash, J. F. ( 1950 ). The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 18 ( 2 ), 155 – 162. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907266
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNash, J. F. ( 1951 ). Noncoooperative games. Annals of Mathematics, 54, 286 – 295. https://doi.org/10.2307/1969529
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNash, J. F. ( 1953 ). Two‐person cooperative games. Econometrica, 21 ( 1 ), 128 – 140. https://doi.org/10.2307/1906951
dc.identifier.citedreferencevon Neumann, J. ( 1928 ). Zur theorie der gesellschaftsspiele (On the theory of parlor games). Mathematische Annalen, 100 ( 1 ), 295 – 320. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01448847
dc.identifier.citedreferencevon Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. ( 1944 ). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePilisuk, M., Potter, P., Rapoport, A., & Winter, J. A. ( 1965 ). War Hawks and Peace Doves: alternate resolutions of experimental conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 9, 491 – 508. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200276500900406
dc.identifier.citedreferencePilisuk, M., & Rapoport, A. ( 1964 ). Stepwise disarmament and sudden destruction in a two‐person game: A research tool. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 8 ( 1 ), 36 – 49. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200276400800104
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaiffa, H. ( 1953 ). Arbitration schemes for generalized two‐person games. In H. W. Kuhn & A. W. Tucker (Eds.), Contributions to the theory of games, II (Annals of Mathematics Studies, 28). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. (Amnon). ( 1967b ). Optimal policies for the Prisoner’s Dilemma. Psychological Review, 74, 136 – 148. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024282.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. (Amnon), & Mowshowitz, A. ( 1966 ). Experimental studies of stochastic models for the Prisoner’s dilemma. Behavioral Science, 11,444–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830110604
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. (Amnon), Seale, D. A., & Colman, A. M. ( 2015 ). Is Tit‐for‐Tat the answer? On the conclusions drawn from Axelrod’s Tournaments. PLoS ONE, 10 ( 7 ), e0134128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134128
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. (Anatol). ( 1932a, May 28). Music: Trade, profession, and art. Musical Courier, 104, 22.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1932b, Sept. 10). Trends in tonal creation. Musical Courier, 105, 11.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1932c, Oct. 8). Vienna street musicians. Musical Courier, 105, 15.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1933, Jan. 7). Musical atmosphere on nationalist basis. Musical Courier, 16, 1.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1944 ). Newtonian physics and aviation cadets. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, I, 154. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42581213
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1947a ). Mathematical theory of motivation interaction of two individuals I. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 9 ( 1 ), 17 – 27. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02478287
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1947b ). Mathematical theory of motivation interaction of two individuals II. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 9 ( 2 ), 41 – 61. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02478292
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1947c ). Forms of output distribution between two individuals motivated by a satisfaction function. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 9 ( 3 ), 109 – 22. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02478289
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1950 ). Science and the goals of man: A study in semantic orientation. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1952a ). What is semantics? ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 10 ( 1 ), 12 – 24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42581010
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1952b ). "Ignition" phenomena in random nets. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 14 ( 1 ), 35 – 44. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02477821
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1953a ). Operational philosophy: Integrating knowledge and action. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1953b ). Spread of information through a population with socio‐structural bias: I. Assumption of transitivity. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 15, 523 – 533. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02476440
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1954 ). Spread of information through a population with socio‐structural bias: III. Suggested experimental procedures. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 16 ( 1 ), 75 – 81. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481814
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1955 ). Application of information networks to a theory of vision. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 17 ( 1 ), 15 – 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481834
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1957a ). Contribution to the theory of random and biased nets. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 19 ( 4 ), 257 – 277. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478417
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1957b ). Lewis F. Richardson’s mathematical theory of war. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1 ( 3 ), 249 – 299. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275700100301
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1957c ). Scientific approach to ethics. Science, 125, 796 – 799. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.125.3252.796
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1960 ). Fights, games, and debates. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1962 ). The use and misuse of game theory. Scientific American, 207 ( 6 ), 108 – 119. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24936389
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1964 ). Strategy and conscience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1965 ). How teach‐ins began. The Guardian, Jun 28, 1965; Retrieved from ProQuest Historical Newspapers: The Guardian (1959–2003).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1966 ). Two‐person game theory: The essential idea. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1967a ). Escape from paradox. Scientific American, 217 ( 1 ), 50 – 59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24926057
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1968 ). Chicken à la Kahn. The Virginia Quarterly Review, 41, 370 – 389.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1970a ). Comments at the ENACT Teach‐In: University of Michigan, March 12–14, 1970. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 27 ( 2 ), 183 – 188. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42576352
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1970b ). On cleaning up the semantic smog. The Michigan Daily, 80 ( 133 ), 3, March 14. https://digital.bentley.umich.edu/midaily/mdp.39015071754035/484
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1970c ). N‐person game theory: Concepts and applications. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1971 ). The big two: Soviet-American perceptions of foreign policy. New York, NY: Pegasus.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1974a ). Conflict in man‐made environment. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1974b ). Prisoner’s dilemma—Recollections and observations. In A. Rapoport (Ed.), Game theory as a theory of conflict resolution (pp. 17 – 34 ). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. (Ed.), ( 1974c ). Game theory as a theory of conflict resolution. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1975 ). Semantics. New York, NY: Crowell.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1983 ). Mathematical models in the social and behavioral sciences. (First published in German by Physica‐Verlag in 1980). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1985 ). Editorial Comment on Articles by Diekmann and Molander. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 29, 619 – 622. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002785029004005
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1986 ). General systems theory: Essential concepts and applications. Cambridge, MA: Abacus Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1988 ). Experiments with N‐person social traps I: Prisoner’s Dilemma, weak Prisoner’s Dilemma, Volunteer’s Dilemma, and Largest Number. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 32, 457 – 472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002788032003003
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1989 ). The origins of violence: Approaches to the study of conflict. New York, NY: Paragon House.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1992 ). Peace: An idea whose time has come. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1993 ). Lights and shadows. In B. Felderer (Ed.), Wirtschafts‐ und Sozialwissenschaften zwischen Theorie und Praxis: 30 Jahre Institut für Höhere Studien in Wien (Chapter 7, pp. 95 – 109 ). Heidelberg, Germany: Physica‐Verlag.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 1997 ). Memories of Kenneth E. Boulding. Review of Social Economy, 55, 416 – 431. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346769700000015
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 2001 ). Skating on thin ice. Oakland, CA: RDR Books.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A. ( 2005 ). Conversations with three Russians: Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, Lenin: A systemic view on two centuries of societal evolution. Hamburg, Germany: Kovač (Russian version 2003).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport, A., & Chammah, A. M. ( 1965a ). Prisoner’s Dilemma: A study of conflict and cooperation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.