View Item 

Show simple item record

The Patient Management and Professionalism Scale to Assess Dental Students’ Behavior in Clinic

dc.contributor.authorRamaswamy, Vidya
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-05T15:09:15Z
dc.date.available2020-02-05T15:09:15Z
dc.date.issued2019-01
dc.identifier.citationRamaswamy, Vidya (2019). "The Patient Management and Professionalism Scale to Assess Dental Students’ Behavior in Clinic." Journal of Dental Education 83(1): 94-102.
dc.identifier.issn0022-0337
dc.identifier.issn1930-7837
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/153768
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherAmerican Dental Education Association
dc.subject.otherTIPI
dc.subject.otherdental education
dc.subject.otherdental students
dc.subject.otherprofessionalism
dc.subject.otherassessment
dc.subject.otherpersonality
dc.titleThe Patient Management and Professionalism Scale to Assess Dental Students’ Behavior in Clinic
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/153768/1/jddjde019012.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.21815/JDE.019.012
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Dental Education
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcLachlan J. The conscientiousness index: a novel tool to explore students’ professionalism. Acad Med 2009; 84: 559 – 65.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMann KV, Millar N, Andreou P. Achievement of non‐cognitive goals of undergraduate medical education: perceptions of medical students, residents, faculty, and other health professionals. Med Educ 2005; 39 ( 1 ): 40 – 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHodges BD, Ginsburg S, Cruess R et al. Assessment of professionalism: recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 conference. Med Teach 2011; 33 ( 5 ): 354 – 63.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLi H, Ding N, Zhang Y et al. Assessing medical professionalism: a systematic review of instruments and their measurement properties. PLoS One 2017; 12 ( 5 ): e0177321.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan De Camp K, Grol R, Bottema B. How to conceptualize professionalism: a qualitative study. Med Teach 2004; 26: 696 – 702.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaylor C, Grey N, Checkland K. Professionalism: it depends where you’re standing. Br Dent J 2017; 222 ( 11 ): 889 – 92.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLievens F, Ones DS, Dilchert S. Personality scale validities increase throughout medical school. J Appl Psychol 2009; 94 ( 6 ): 1514 – 35.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHojat M. Personality assessments and outcomes in medical education and the practice of medicine: AMEE guide no. 79. Med Teach 2013; 35 ( 7 ): e1267 –301.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarah‐Franco S, Deoghare H. Advancing measurement of dental students’ professionalism. J Dent Educ 2017; 81 ( 11 ): 1338 – 44.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeller D, Komar S, Lee WB. The dynamics of personality states, goals, and well‐being. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2007; 33: 898 – 910.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAhmed AJB. Critical synthesis package: ten‐item personality inventory (TIPI)—a quick scan of personality structure. MedEdPORTAL 2013; 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEhrhart MG, Roesch SC. Testing the latent factor structure and construct validity of the ten‐item personality inventory. Pers Indiv Diff 2009; 47 ( 8 ): 900 – 5.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCrae RCP. Personality trait structure as a human universal. Am Psychol 1997; 52: 509 – 16.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGosling SD, Rentfrow PJ, Swann WB. Ten item personality measure (TIPI). 2013. At: www.midss.org/content/ten‐item‐personality‐measure‐tipi -->. Accessed 23 March 2018.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGosling SD, Rentfrow PJ, Swann WB Jr A very brief measure of the big‐five personality domains. J Res Pers 2003; 37: 504 – 28.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDoherty EN. Personality factors and medical training: a review of literature. Med Educ 2011; 45 ( 2 ): 132 – 40.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmithers S, Cunningham DP. What predicts performance in Canadian dental schools? J Dent Educ 2004; 68 ( 5 ): 598 – 613.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLievens F, De Fruyt F, De Maeseneer J. Medical students’ personality, characteristics, and academic performance: a fiver‐factor model perspective. Med Educ 2002; 36: 1050 – 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChibnall JT, Detrick P. Are medical students agreeable? An exploration of personality in relation to clinical skills training. Med Teach 2009; 31: e311 –5.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchonrock‐Adema J, Heijne‐Penninga M, Van Hell EA, Cohen‐Schotanus J. Necessary steps in factor analysis: enhancing validation studies of educational instruments— the PHEEM applied to clerks as an example. Med Teach 2009; 31 ( 6 ): e226 –32.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKossioni AE, Lyrakos G, Ntinalexi I et al. The development and validation of a questionnaire to measure the clinical learning environment for undergraduate dental students (DECLEI). Eur J Dent Educ 2014; 18 ( 2 ): 71 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVirtue SM, Tellez M. Identifying noncognitive skills that contribute to dental students’ success: dental faculty perspectives. J Dent Educ 2017; 81 ( 3 ): 300 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoon KTJ. Ethical and professional conduct of medical students: review of current assessment measures and controversies. J Med Ethics 2004; 30: 221 – 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChamberlain TC, Cunningham DP. Personality as a predictor of professional behavior in dental school: comparisons with dental practitioners. J Dent Educ 2005; 69 ( 11 ): 1222 – 37.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLynch DSP, Eiser A. Assessing professionalism: a review of the literature. Med Teach 2004; 26: 366 – 73.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jddjde019012.pdf
Size:
297.6KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.