Show simple item record

A utility approach to individualized optimal dose selection using biomarkers

dc.contributor.authorLi, Pin
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Jeremy M.G.
dc.contributor.authorKong, Spring
dc.contributor.authorJolly, Shruti
dc.contributor.authorSchipper, Matthew J.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-17T18:28:18Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHS
dc.date.available2020-03-17T18:28:18Z
dc.date.issued2020-03
dc.identifier.citationLi, Pin; Taylor, Jeremy M.G.; Kong, Spring; Jolly, Shruti; Schipper, Matthew J. (2020). "A utility approach to individualized optimal dose selection using biomarkers." Biometrical Journal 62(2): 386-397.
dc.identifier.issn0323-3847
dc.identifier.issn1521-4036
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/154301
dc.description.abstractIn many settings, including oncology, increasing the dose of treatment results in both increased efficacy and toxicity. With the increasing availability of validated biomarkers and prediction models, there is the potential for individualized dosing based on patient specific factors. We consider the setting where there is an existing dataset of patients treated with heterogenous doses and including binary efficacy and toxicity outcomes and patient factors such as clinical features and biomarkers. The goal is to analyze the data to estimate an optimal dose for each (future) patient based on their clinical features and biomarkers. We propose an optimal individualized dose finding rule by maximizing utility functions for individual patients while limiting the rate of toxicity. The utility is defined as a weighted combination of efficacy and toxicity probabilities. This approach maximizes overall efficacy at a prespecified constraint on overall toxicity. We model the binary efficacy and toxicity outcomes using logistic regression with dose, biomarkers and dose–biomarker interactions. To incorporate the large number of potential parameters, we use the LASSO method. We additionally constrain the dose effect to be non‐negative for both efficacy and toxicity for all patients. Simulation studies show that the utility approach combined with any of the modeling methods can improve efficacy without increasing toxicity relative to fixed dosing. The proposed methods are illustrated using a dataset of patients with lung cancer treated with radiation therapy.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherconstrained LASSO
dc.subject.otherutility
dc.subject.otherpersonalized medicine
dc.subject.otheroptimal treatment regime
dc.subject.otherefficacy toxicity trade‐off
dc.titleA utility approach to individualized optimal dose selection using biomarkers
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiological Chemistry
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhysics
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154301/1/bimj2068.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154301/2/bimj2068_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/bimj.201900030
dc.identifier.sourceBiometrical Journal
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuo, B. & Yuan, Y. ( 2017 ). Bayesian phase I/II biomarker‐based dose finding for precision medicine with molecularly targeted agents. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 112, 508 – 520.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKuo, L. & Mallick, B. ( 1998 ). Variable selection for regression models. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series B, 60, 65 – 81.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchipper, M. J., Taylor, J. M., TenHaken, R., Matuzak, M. M., Kong, F.‐M., & Lawrence, T. S. ( 2014 ). Personalized dose selection in radiation therapy using statistical models for toxicity and efficacy with dose and biomarkers as covariates. Statistics in Medicine, 33, 5330 – 5339.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePostel‐Vinay, S., Arkenau, H., Olmos, D., Ang, J., Barriuso, J., Ashley, S. … Kaye, S. ( 2009 ). Clinical benefit in phase‐I trials of novel molecularly targeted agents: Does dose matter? British Journal of Cancer, 100, 1373 – 1378.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePark, T. & Casella, G. ( 2008 ). The Bayesian lasso. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 681 – 686.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFoster, J. C., Taylor, J. M., & Ruberg, S. J. ( 2011 ). Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data. Statistics in Medicine, 30, 2867 – 2880.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGaines, B. R., Kim, J., & Zhou, H. ( 2018 ). Algorithms for fitting the constrained lasso. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 27, 861 – 871.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHe, T. ( 2011 ). Lasso and general L1‐regularized regression under linear equality and inequality constraints (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen, G., Zeng, D., & Kosorok, M. R. ( 2016 ). Personalized dose finding using outcome weighted learning. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 111, 1509 – 1521.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZou, H. & Hastie, T. ( 2005 ). Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 67, 301 – 320.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhao, Y., Zeng, D., Rush, A. J., & Kosorok, M. R. ( 2012 ). Estimating individualized treatment rules using outcome weighted learning. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 107, 1106 – 1118.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhang, B., Tsiatis, A. A., Laber, E. B., & Davidian, M. ( 2012b ). A robust method for estimating optimal treatment regimes. Biometrics, 68, 1010 – 1018.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhang, B., Tsiatis, A. A., Davidian, M., Zhang, M., & Laber, E. ( 2012a ). Estimating optimal treatment regimes from a classification perspective. Stat, 1, 103 – 114.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang, Y., Fu, H., & Zeng, D. ( 2018 ). Learning optimal personalized treatment rules in consideration of benefit and risk: With an application to treating type 2 diabetes patients with insulin therapies. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 113, 1 – 13.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTibshirani, R. ( 1996 ). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 58, 267 – 288.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThall, P. F. & Cook, J. D. ( 2004 ). Dose‐finding based on efficacy–toxicity trade‐offs. Biometrics, 60, 684 – 693.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.