Show simple item record

The Difficulties in Assessing Wounds Created by .410 Bore Ammunition and Weapons

dc.contributor.authorHlavaty, Leigh
dc.contributor.authorAmley, Jeffery
dc.contributor.authorRoot, Kelly
dc.contributor.authorAvedschmidt, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorJaworski, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorSung, LokMan
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-17T18:30:17Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHS
dc.date.available2020-03-17T18:30:17Z
dc.date.issued2020-03
dc.identifier.citationHlavaty, Leigh; Amley, Jeffery; Root, Kelly; Avedschmidt, Sarah; Jaworski, Andrea; Sung, LokMan (2020). "The Difficulties in Assessing Wounds Created by .410 Bore Ammunition and Weapons." Journal of Forensic Sciences 65(2): 500-507.
dc.identifier.issn0022-1198
dc.identifier.issn1556-4029
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/154370
dc.description.abstractWhen interpreting firearm injuries, the distinction between gunshot wounds and shotgun wounds is important, and separation of these categories is typically straightforward. However, .410 bore firearms can make the classification difficult. Shotguns and revolvers that can fire the same .410 bore ammunition are readily available. This study investigates the soot and gunpowder deposits and pellet patterning of these two types of weapons using cartridges specially designed for .410 bore revolvers and standard birdshot pellet ammunition. For both ammunition types, the revolver had more prompt pellet dispersion and positive detection of gunpowder at greater distances compared to the shotgun. Additionally, .410 bore slugs are of similar caliber to many common bullets. In comparing the .410 bore slugs to equivalent bullets, some morphologic differences may be imparted on the skin by the slugs, but the greatest insight into the weapon remained with the retained projectiles.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherCRC Press
dc.subject.othershotgun
dc.subject.otherrevolver
dc.subject.otherpistol
dc.subject.otherforensic science
dc.subject.otherforensic pathology
dc.subject.other.410 bore
dc.titleThe Difficulties in Assessing Wounds Created by .410 Bore Ammunition and Weapons
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelScience (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154370/1/jfo14181.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154370/2/jfo14181_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1556-4029.14181
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Forensic Sciences
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeBeer S, Le Luduec JB, Kaiserlain D, Laurent P, Nicolas JF, Dubois B, et al. Comparative histology and immunohistochemistry of porcine versus human skin. Eur J Dermatol 2013; 23 ( 4 ): 456 – 66.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaag M, Haag L. Skin perforation and skin stimulants. AFTE J 2002; 34 ( 3 ): 268 – 86.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePoulos C, Tiomak W. A review of new projectile types. Acad Forensic Pathol 2013; 3 ( 2 ): 144 – 53.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiMaio VJM. Gunshot wounds: practical aspects of firearms, ballistics, and forensic techniques. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2016; 179 – 224.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePoulos C. A review of newly developed firearms that can fire multiple ammunition types. Acad Forensic Pathol 2013; 3 ( 2 ): 139 – 43.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.