View Item 

Show simple item record

Modeling peer effect modification by network strength: The diffusion of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in the US hospital network
dc.contributor.authorO’Malley, A. James
dc.contributor.authorMoen, Erika L.
dc.contributor.authorBynum, Julie P. W.
dc.contributor.authorAustin, Andrea M.
dc.contributor.authorSkinner, Jonathan S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-17T18:31:56Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_14_MONTHS
dc.date.available2020-03-17T18:31:56Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-15
dc.identifier.citationO’Malley, A. James; Moen, Erika L.; Bynum, Julie P. W.; Austin, Andrea M.; Skinner, Jonathan S. (2020). "Modeling peer effect modification by network strength: The diffusion of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in the US hospital network." Statistics in Medicine 39(8): 1125-1144.
dc.identifier.issn0277-6715
dc.identifier.issn1097-0258
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/154422
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.subject.othersocial network analysis
dc.subject.othernationwide hospital network
dc.subject.otherlongitudinal model
dc.subject.otherimplantable cardioverter defibrillator
dc.subject.otherhierarchical model
dc.subject.otherpeer effect
dc.titleModeling peer effect modification by network strength: The diffusion of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in the US hospital network
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelStatistics and Numeric Data
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154422/1/sim8466.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154422/2/sim8466_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/sim.8466
dc.identifier.sourceStatistics in Medicine
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFujimoto K, Chou CP, Valente TW. The network autocorrelation model using two‐mode data: affiliation exposure and potential bias in the autocorrelation parameter. Soc Netw. 2011; 33 ( 3 ): 231 ‐ 243.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee BY, Song Y, Bartsch SM, Kim DS, Singh A, Avery TR. Long‐term care facilities: important participants of the acute care facility social network? PLoS One. 2011; 6 ( 12 ): e29342.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLomi A, Mascia D, Vu DQ, Pallotti F, Conaldi G, Iwashyna TJ. Quality of care and interhospital collaboration: a study of patient transfers in Italy. Med Care. 2014; 52 ( 5 ): 407 ‐ 414.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMandl KD, Olson KL, Mines D, Liu C, Tian F. Provider collaboration: cohesion, constellations, and shared patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2014; 29 ( 11 ): 1499 ‐ 1505.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePham HH, Schrag DS, O’Malley AS, Wu B, Bach PB. Care patterns in medicare and their implications for pay for performance. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 1130 ‐ 1139.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBynum JPW, Bernal‐Delgado E, Gottlieb D, Fisher E. Assigning ambulatory patients and their physicians to hospitals: a method for obtaining population‐based provider performance measurements. Health Serv Res. 2007; 42: 45 ‐ 62.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoen EL, Bynum JPW, Austin AM, Chakraborti G, Skinner JS, O’Malley AJ. Assessing variation in implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy guideline adherence with physician and hospital patient‐sharing networks. Med Care. 2017; 56 ( 4 ): 350 ‐ 357.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLyons R. The spread of evidence‐poor medicine via flawed social‐network analysis. Stat, Politics, Policy. 2011; 2 ( 1 ): 2.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO’Malley AJ, Marsden PV. The analysis of social networks. Health Serv Outcome Res Methodol. 2008; 8 ( 4 ): 222 ‐ 269.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrd K. Estimation methods for models of spatial interaction. J Am Stat Assoc. 2012; 70 ( 349 ): 120 ‐ 126.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1988.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedkin NEA. Structural Theory of Social Influence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnselin L. Spatial Econometrics. In: Badi B, ed. A Companion to Theoretical Econometrics. Oxford, UK: B. H. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2001.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceManski CA. Identification of endogenous social effects: the reflection problem. Rev Econ Stud. 1993; 60: 531 ‐ 542.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurt RS, Doreian P. Testing a structural model of perception: conformity and deviance with respect to journal norms in elite sociological methodology. Qual Quant. 1982; 16: 109 ‐ 150.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO’Malley AJ. The analysis of social network data: an exciting frontier for statisticians. Stat Med. 2013; 32: 539 ‐ 555.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO’Malley AJ, Onnela JP. Introduction to social network analysis: in health services evaluation section. In: Levy A, Goring S, Gatsonis C, Sobolev B, van Ginneken E, Busse R, eds. The Handbook of Health Services Research. New York, NY: Springer; 2019.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBynum JPW, Andrews A, Sharp S, McCullough D, Wennberg JE. Fewer hospitalizations result when primary care is highly integrated into a continuing care retirement community. Health Aff. 2011; 30 ( 5 ): 975 ‐ 984.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarnett ML, Landon BE, O’Malley AJ, Keating NL, Christakis NA. Mapping physician networks with self‐ reported and administrative data. Health Serv Res. 2011; 46: 1592 ‐ 1609.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNoel H, Nyhan B. The "unfriending" problem: the consequences of homophily in friendship retention for causal estimates of social influence. Soc Netw. 2011; 33: 211 ‐ 218.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShalizi CR, Thomas AC. Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociol Methods Res. 2011; 40 ( 2 ): 211 ‐ 239.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO’Malley AJ, Elwert F, Rosenquist JN, Zaslavsky AM, Christakis NA. Estimating peer effects in longitudinal dyadic data using instrumental variables. Biometrics. 2010; 70 ( 3 ): 506 ‐ 515.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVanderWeele TJ, Ogburn EL, Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ. Why and when "flawed" social network analyses still yield valid tests of no contagion. Stat, Politics, Policy. 2012; 3 ( 1 ):Article number 4. https://doi.org/10.1515/2151‐7509.1050.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteglich CEG, Snijders TAB, Pearson M. Dynamic networks behavior: separating selection from influence. Sociol Methodol. 2010; 40 ( 1 ): 329 ‐ 393.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeenders RTAJ. Longitudinal behavior of network structure and actor attributes: modeling interdependence of contagion and selection. In: Doreian P, Stokman F, eds. Evolution of Social Networks. New York: Gordon and Breach; 1997.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobins GL, Pattison PE, Elliott P. Network models for social influence processes. Psychometrika. 2001; 66: 161 ‐ 189.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim DA, Hwong AR, Stafford D, et al. A randomised controlled trial of social network targeting to maximise population behaviour change. Lancet. 2015; 386 ( 9989 ): 145 ‐ 153.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeSage J, Pace RK. Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. New York: CRC Press; 2009.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, Gottlieb DJ. Variations in the longitudinal efficiency of academic medical centers. Health Aff. 2004; Supplemental Web Exclusive; 23: 19 ‐ 32.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, Gottlieb DJ, Lucas FL, Pinder EL. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 1: the content, quality, and accessibility of care. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138: 273 ‐ 287.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, Gottlieb DJ, Lucas FL, Pinder EL. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 2: health outcomes and satisfaction with care. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138: 273 ‐ 287.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWennberg JE. Tracking Medicine: A Researcher’s Quest to Understand Health Care. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2010.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewhouse JP, Garber AM, Graham RP, McCoy MA, Mancher M, Kibria A. Variation in Health Care Spending: Target Decision Making, Not Geography. Board on Health Care Services: Institute of Medicine; 2013.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTDI. The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care. Lebanon, New Hampshire: The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice. 2013. http://www.dartmouthatlas.org/.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceColeman J, Katz E, Menzel H. The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry. 1957; 20 ( 4 ): 253 ‐ 270.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWaller LA, Gotway CA. Applied Spatial Statistics for Public Health Data. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Interscience; 2004.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBanerjee S, Carlin BP, Gelfand AE. Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall; 2004.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKapoor M, Kelejian HH, Prucha IR. Panel data models with spatially correlated error components. J Econ. 2007; 140 ( 1 ): 97 ‐ 130.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKelejian HH, Prucha IR. HAC estimation in a spatial framework. J Econ. 2007; 140 ( 1 ): 131 ‐ 154.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDoreian P. Linear‐models with spatially distributed data‐ spatial disturbances or spatial effects. Sociol Methods Res. 1980; 9: 29 ‐ 60.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDow MM. A biparametric approach to network autocorrelation. Sociol Methods Res. 1984; 13: 201 ‐ 217.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDoreian P. Network autocorrelation models: problems and prospects. In: Griffith DA, ed. Spatial statistics: Past, present, future. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Document Services; 1989: 369 ‐ 389.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedkin NE. Social networks in structural equations models. Soc Psychol Q. 1990; 53: 316 ‐ 328.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeenders R. Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: constructing the weight matrix. Soc Net. 2002; 24: 21 ‐ 47.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDittrich D, Leenders RTAJ, Mulder J. Bayesian estimation of the network autocorrelation model. Soc Netw. 2017; 48: 213 ‐ 236.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDittrich D, Leenders RTAJ, Mulder J. Network autocorrelation modeling: a Bayes factor approach for testing (multiple) precise interval hypotheses. Sociol Methods Res. 2017; 48 ( 3 ): 642 ‐ 676.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChristakis NA, Fowler JH. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357: 370 ‐ 379.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNorton EC, Lindrooth RC, Ennett ST. Controlling for the endogeneity of peer substance use on adolescent alcohol and tobacco use. Health Econ. 1998; 7 ( 5 ): 439 ‐ 453.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenquist JN, Fowler JH, Murabito J, Christakis NA. The spread of alcohol consumption behavior in a large social network. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 152 ( 7 ): 426 ‐ 433.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeating N, Ayanian J, Cleary P, Marsden P. Factors affecting influential discussions among physicians: a social network analysis of a primary care practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2007; 22 ( 6 ): 794 ‐ 798.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIwashyna TJ, Christie JD, Kahn JM, Asch DA. Uncharted paths: hospital networks in critical care. Chest. 2009; 135: 827 ‐ 833.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHorwitz JR, Nichols A, Nallamothu BK, Sasson C, Iwashyna TJ. Expansion of invasive cardiac services in the United States. Circulation. 2013; 128: 803 ‐ 810.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePollack CE, Soulos PR, Gross CP. Physician’s peer exposure and the adoption of a new cancer treatment modality. Cancer. 2015; 121 ( 16 ): 2799 ‐ 2807.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePollack CE, Soulos PR, Herrin J, et al. The impact of social contagion on physician adoption of advanced imaging tests in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017; 109 ( 8 ): djw330.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLandon BE, Keating NL, Barnett ML, et al. Variation in patient‐sharing networks of physicians across the United States. J Am Med Assoc. 2008; 308: 265 ‐ 273.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
sim8466.pdf
Size:
1.137MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
sim8466_am.pdf
Size:
258.2KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.