View Item 

Show simple item record

A comparative study of engagement in mobile and wearable health monitoring for bipolar disorder
dc.contributor.authorTil, Kaela
dc.contributor.authorMcInnis, Melvin G.
dc.contributor.authorCochran, Amy
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-02T18:38:25Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_12_MONTHS
dc.date.available2020-04-02T18:38:25Z
dc.date.issued2020-03
dc.identifier.citationTil, Kaela; McInnis, Melvin G.; Cochran, Amy (2020). "A comparative study of engagement in mobile and wearable health monitoring for bipolar disorder." Bipolar Disorders 22(2): 182-190.
dc.identifier.issn1398-5647
dc.identifier.issn1399-5618
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/154615
dc.description.abstractObjectivesSelf‐monitoring is recommended for individuals with bipolar disorder, with numerous technological solutions available. This study aimed to identify basic components of these solutions that increase engagement with self‐monitoring.MethodsParticipants with bipolar disorder (n = 47) monitored their symptoms with a Fitbit and a smartphone app and were randomly assigned to either review or not review recorded symptoms weekly. We tested whether individuals would better adhere to and prefer monitoring with passive monitoring with an activity tracker compared to active monitoring with a smartphone app and whether individuals would better adhere to self‐monitoring if their recorded symptoms were reviewed with an interviewer.ResultsMonitoring with a smartphone app achieved similar adherence and preference to Fitbit (P > .85). Linear mixed effects modeling found adherence decreased significantly more over the study for the Fitbit (12% more, P < .001) even though more participants reported they would use the Fitbit over a year compared to the app (72.3% vs 46.8%). Reviewing symptoms weekly did not improve adherence, but most participants reported they would prefer to review symptoms with a clinician (74.5%) and on monthly basis (57.5%) compared to alternatives. Participants endorsed sleep as the most important symptom to monitor, forgetfulness as the largest barrier to self‐monitoring, and raising self‐awareness as the best reason for self‐monitoring.ConclusionsWe recommend a combined strategy of wearable and mobile monitoring that includes reminders, targets raising self‐awareness, and tracks sleep. A clinician may want to review symptoms on a monthly basis.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03358238.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherBipolar disorder
dc.subject.otherSmartphone
dc.subject.otherPhysiologic
dc.subject.otherMonitoring
dc.subject.otherFitness Trackers
dc.titleA comparative study of engagement in mobile and wearable health monitoring for bipolar disorder
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154615/1/bdi12849_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154615/2/bdi12849.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/bdi.12849
dc.identifier.sourceBipolar Disorders
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcInnis MG, Assari S, Kamali M, et al. Cohort profile: The Heinz C Prechter longitudinal study of bipolar disorder. Int J Epidemiol. 2017; 47 ( 1 ): 28 ‐ 28n.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNicholas J, Larsen ME, Proudfoot J, Christensen H. Mobile apps for bipolar disorder: A systematic review of features and content quality. J Med Internet Res. 2015; 17 ( 8 ): e198.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMelville KM, Casey LM, Kavanagh DJ. Dropout from internet‐based treatment for psychological disorders. Br J Clin Psychol. 2010; 49 ( 4 ): 455 ‐ 471.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYeager CM, Benight CC. If we build it, will they come? Issues of engagement with digital health interventions for trauma recovery. mHealth. 2018; 4: 37.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKillikelly C, Zhimin H, Reeder C, Til W. Improving adherence to web‐based and mobile technologies for people with psychosis: Systematic review of new potential predictors of adherence. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2017; 5 ( 7 ): e94.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDoherty K, Barry M, Marcano‐Belisario J, Arnaud B, Morrison C, Doherty G. A mobile app for the self‐report of psychological well‐being during pregnancy (BrightSelf): Qualitative design study. JMIR Ment Health. 2018; 5 ( 4 ): e10007.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDaus H, Kislicyn N, Heuer S, Backenstrass M. Disease management apps and technical assistance systems for bipolar disorder: Investigating the patients’ point of view. J Affect Disord. 2018; 229 ( 15 ): 351 ‐ 357.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaunders K, Bilderbeck AC, Panchal P, Atkinson LZ, Geddes JR, Goodwin GM. Experiences of a remote mood study and activity monitoring in bipolar disorder: A qualitative study. Eur Psychiatry. 2017; 41: 115 ‐ 121.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFaurholt‐Jepsen M, Vinberg M, Christensen EM, Frost M, Bardram J, Kessing LV. Daily electronic self‐monitoring of subjective and objective symptoms in bipolar disorder‐the MONARCA trial protocol (MONitoring, treAtment and pRediCtion of bipolAr disorder episodes): a randomised controlled single‐blind trial. BMJ Open. 2013; 3: e003353.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGideon J, Provost EM, McInnis M. Mood state of prediction from speech of varying acoustic quality for individuals with bipolar disorder. Proc IEEE Int Conf Acoust Speech. Signal Process. 2018; 2359 ‐ 2363.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZulueta J, Piscitello A, Rasic M, et al. Predicting mood disturbance severity with mobile phone keystroke metadata: A BiAffect digital phenotyping study. JMIR. 2018; 20 ( 7 ): e241.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcClung CA. How might circadian rhythms control mood? Let me count the ways. Biol Psychiatry. 2013; 74 ( 4 ): 242 ‐ 249.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRohani DA, Faurholt‐Jepsen M, Vedel Kessing L, Bardram JE. Correlations between objective behavioral features collected from mobile and wearable devices and depressive mood symptoms in patients with affective disorders: Systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018; 6 ( 8 ): e165.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCochran A, Belman‐Wells L, McInnis M. Engagement strategies for self‐monitoring symptoms of bipolar disorder with mobile and wearable technology: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018; 7 ( 5 ): e130.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlasnja P, Pratt W. Healthcare in the pocket: Mapping the space of mobile health interventions. J Biomed Inform. 2010; 45 ( 1 ): 184 ‐ 198.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJr N, Blehar MC, Kaufmann CA, et al. Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies: Rationale, unique features, and training. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994; 54 ( 11 ): 849 ‐ 859.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYoung RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE, Meyer DA. A rating scale for mania: Reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry. 1978; 133 ( 5 ): 429 ‐ 435.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams J. A structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988; 45 ( 8 ): 742 ‐ 747.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWare JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36‐item short‐form health survey (SF‐36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992; 30 ( 6 ): 473 ‐ 483.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChan S, Luming L, Torous J, Gratzer D, Yellowlees PM. Review of the use of asynchronous technologies incorporated in mental health care. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018; 20: 85.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCristol S. Patient’s perspective on using mobile technology as an aid to psychotherapy. JMIR Ment Health. 2018; 5 ( 4 ): e10015.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFauholot‐Jepsen M, Geddes JR, Goodwin GM, et al. Reporting guidelines on remotely collected electronic data in mood disorder (eMOOD)‐recommendations. Transl Psychiatry. 2019; 9 ( 1 ): 162.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDoherty G, Coyle D, Sharry J. Engagement with online mental health interventions: An exploratory clinical study of a treatment for depression. Presented at: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; May, 2012; Austin, TX.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoffel E, Kuhn E, Petsoulis N, et al. A randomized controlled pilot study to CBT‐I Coach: Feasibility, acceptability, and potential impact of a mobile phone application for patients in cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia. Health Inform J. 2018; 24 ( 1 ): 3 ‐ 13.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGitlin MJ, Miklowitz DJ. The difficult lives of individuals with bipolar disorder: A review of functional outcomes and their implications for treatment. J Affect Disord. 2017; 209: 147 ‐ 154.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSoreca I, Frank E, Kupfer DJ. The phenomenology of bipolar disorder: What drives the high rate of medical burden and determines long‐term prognosis? Depress Anxiety. 2009; 26 ( 1 ): 73 ‐ 82.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWorld Health Organization Apps.who.int. mgGAP intervention guide for mental, neurological, and substance use disorders in non‐specialized health settings. 2010. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44406/9789241548069_eng.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed May 18, 2019.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiklowitz DJ, Scott J. Psychosocial treatments for bipolar disorder: Cost‐effectiveness, mediating mechanisms, and future directions. Bipolar disord. 2009; 11 ( s2 ): 110 ‐ 122.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOud M, Mayo‐Wilson E, Braidwood R, et al. Psychological interventions for adults with bipolar disorder: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2016; 208 ( 3 ): 213 ‐ 222.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMalhi GS, Hamilton A, Morris G, Mannie Z, Das P, Outhred T. The promise of digital mood tracking technologies: Are we heading on the right track? EBMH. 2017; 20 ( 4 ): 102 ‐ 106.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurnane EL, Cosley D, Chang P, et al. Self‐monitoring practices, attitudes, and needs of individuals with bipolar disorder: Implications for the design of technologies to manage mental health. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016; 20 ( 3 ): 477 ‐ 484.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLawles‐Wickwar S, McBain H, Mulligan K. Application and effectiveness of telehealth to support severe mental illness management: Systematic review. JMIR Ment Health. 2018; 5 ( 4 ): e62.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAppelboom G, Camacho E, Abraham ME, et al. Smart wearable body sensors for patient self‐assessment and monitoring. Arch Public Health. 2014; 72 ( 28 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOsmani V, Maxhuni A, Grünerbl A, Lukowicz P, Haring C, Mayora O. Monitoring activity of patients with bipolar disorder using smart phones. Presented at: 11th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing & Multimedia; December 2–4, 2013; Vienna, Austria.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
bdi12849_am.pdf
Size:
234.2KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
bdi12849.pdf
Size:
858.0KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.