View Item 

Show simple item record

American Academy of Periodontology best evidence consensus statement on modifying periodontal phenotype in preparation for orthodontic and restorative treatment
dc.contributor.authorKao, Richard T.
dc.contributor.authorCurtis, Donald A.
dc.contributor.authorKim, David M.
dc.contributor.authorLin, Guo‐hao
dc.contributor.authorWang, Chin‐wei
dc.contributor.authorCobb, Charles M.
dc.contributor.authorHsu, Yung‐ting
dc.contributor.authorKan, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorVelasquez, Diego
dc.contributor.authorAvila‐ortiz, Gustavo
dc.contributor.authorYu, Shan‐huey
dc.contributor.authorMandelaris, George A.
dc.contributor.authorRosen, Paul S.
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Marianna
dc.contributor.authorGunsolley, John
dc.contributor.authorGoss, Katie
dc.contributor.authorAmbruster, Jeanne
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom‐lay
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-02T18:39:24Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_12_MONTHS
dc.date.available2020-04-02T18:39:24Z
dc.date.issued2020-03
dc.identifier.citationKao, Richard T.; Curtis, Donald A.; Kim, David M.; Lin, Guo‐hao ; Wang, Chin‐wei ; Cobb, Charles M.; Hsu, Yung‐ting ; Kan, Joseph; Velasquez, Diego; Avila‐ortiz, Gustavo ; Yu, Shan‐huey ; Mandelaris, George A.; Rosen, Paul S.; Evans, Marianna; Gunsolley, John; Goss, Katie; Ambruster, Jeanne; Wang, Hom‐lay (2020). "American Academy of Periodontology best evidence consensus statement on modifying periodontal phenotype in preparation for orthodontic and restorative treatment." Journal of Periodontology 91(3): 289-298.
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492
dc.identifier.issn1943-3670
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/154649
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.titleAmerican Academy of Periodontology best evidence consensus statement on modifying periodontal phenotype in preparation for orthodontic and restorative treatment
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154649/1/jper10498.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154649/2/jper10498_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/JPER.19-0577
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Periodontology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZuiderveld EG, Meijer HJA, den Hartog L, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM. Effect of connective tissue grafting on peri- implant tissue in single immediate implant sites: a RCT. J Clin Periodontol. 2018; 45: 253 - 264.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerglundh T, Lindhe J. Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited. J Clin Periodontol. 1996; 23: 971 - 973.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCochran DL, Hermann JS, Schenk RK, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Biologic width around titanium implants. A histometric analysis of the implanto- gingival junction around unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol. 1997; 68: 186 - 198.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuser D, Weber HP, Donath K, Fiorellini JP, Paquette DW, Williams RC. Soft tissue reactions to non- submerged unloaded titanium implants in beagle dogs. J Periodontol. 1992; 63: 225 - 235.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBauman GR, Rapley JW, Hallmon WW, Mills M. The peri- implant sulcus. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993; 8: 273 - 280.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin GH, Chan HL, Wang HL. The significance of keratinized mucosa on implant health: a systematic review. J Periodontol. 2013; 84: 1755 - 1767.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThoma DS, Naenni N, Figuero E, et al. Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri- implant health or disease: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29 ( Suppl 15 ): 32 - 49.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiyasato M, Crigger M, Egelberg J. Gingival condition in areas of minimal and appreciable width of keratinized gingiva. J Clin Periodontol. 1977; 4: 200 - 209.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBienz SP, Jung RE, Sapata VM, Hammerle CHF, Husler J, Thoma DS. Volumetric changes and peri- implant health at implant sites with or without soft tissue grafting in the esthetic zone, a retrospective case- control study with a 5- year follow- up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017; 28: 1459 - 1465.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFenner N, Hammerle CH, Sailer I, Jung RE. Long- term clinical, technical, and esthetic outcomes of all- ceramic vs. titanium abutments on implant supporting single- tooth reconstructions after at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27: 716 - 723.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMigliorati M, Amorfini L, Signori A, Biavati AS, Benedicenti S. Clinical and aesthetic outcome with post- extractive implants with or without soft tissue augmentation: a 2- year randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015; 17: 983 - 995.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWiesner G, Esposito M, Worthington H, Schlee M. Connective tissue grafts for thickening peri- implant tissues at implant placement. One- year results from an explanatory split- mouth randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010; 3: 27 - 35.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYoshino S, Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K, Roe P, Lozada JL. Effects of connective tissue grafting on the facial gingival level following single immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the esthetic zone: a 1- year randomized controlled prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29: 432 - 440.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatafuchi M, Weinstein BF, Leroux BG, Chen YW, Daubert DM. Restoration contour is a risk indicator for peri- implantitis: a cross- sectional radiographic analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2018; 45: 225 - 232.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDalago HR, Schuldt Filho G, Rodrigues MA, Renvert S, Bianchini MA. Risk indicators for peri- implantitis. A cross- sectional study with 916 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017; 28: 144 - 150.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGay IC, Tran DT, Weltman R, et al. Role of supportive maintenance therapy on implant survival: a university- based 17 years retrospective analysis. Int J Dent Hyg. 2016; 14: 267 - 271.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSerino G, Strom C. Peri- implantitis in partially edentulous patients: association with inadequate plaque control. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20: 169 - 174.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKao RT. Dentistry at the crossroads. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2014; 42: 91 - 95.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerussolo J, Souza AB, Matarazzo F, Oliveira RP, Araujo MG. Influence of the keratinized mucosa on the stability of peri- implant tissues and brushing discomfort: a 4- year follow- up study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29: 1177 - 1185.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSouza AB, Tormena M, Matarazzo F, Araujo MG. The influence of peri- implant keratinized mucosa on brushing discomfort and peri- implant tissue health. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27: 650 - 655.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZetu L, Wang HL. Management of inter- dental/inter- implant papilla. J Clin Periodontol. 2005; 32: 831 - 839.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRenkema AM, Fudalej PS, Renkema A, Kiekens R, Katsaros C. Development of labial gingival recessions in orthodontically treated patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013; 143: 206 - 212.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMandelaris GA, Neiva R, Chambrone L. Cone- beam computed tomography and interdisciplinary dentofacial therapy: an American Academy of Periodontology best evidence review focusing on risk assessment of the dentoalveolar bone changes influenced by tooth movement. J Periodontol. 2017; 88: 960 - 977.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMandelaris GA, Scheyer ET, Evans M, et al. American Academy of Periodontology’s best evidence consensus statement on selected oral applications for cone- beam computed tomography. J Periodontol. 2017; 88: 939 - 945.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShoreibah EA, Ibrahim SA, Attia MS, Diab MM. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of bone grafting in corticotomy- facilitated orthodontics in adults. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2012; 14: 105 - 113.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBahammam MA. Effectiveness of bovine- derived xenograft versus bioactive glass with periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics in adults: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2016; 16: 126 - 135.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrugnami F, Caiazzo A, Mehra P. Can corticotomy (with or without bone grafting) expand the limits of safe orthodontic therapy. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2018; 8: 1 - 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMakki L, Ferguson DJ, Wilcko MT, et al. Mandibular irregularity index stability following alveolar corticotomy and grafting: a 10- year preliminary study. Angle Orthod. 2015; 85: 743 - 749.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilcko MT, Ferguson DJ, Makki L, Wilcko WM. Keratinized gingiva height increases after alveolar corticotomy and augmentation bone grafting. J Periodontol. 2015; 86: 1107 - 1115.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAhn HW, Seo DH, Kim SH, Park YG, Chung KR, Nelson G. Morphologic evaluation of dentoalveolar structures of mandibular anterior teeth during augmented corticotomy- assisted decompensation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016; 150: 659 - 669.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNgan PW, Burch JG, Wei SH. Grafted and ungrafted labial gingival recession in pediatric orthodontic patients: effects of retraction and inflammation. Quintessence Int. 1991; 22: 103 - 111.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaynard JG, Ochsenbein C. Mucogingival problems prevalence and therapy in children. J Periodontol. 1975; 46: 543 - 552.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJepsen S, Caton JG, Albandar JM, et al. Periodontal manifestations of systemic diseases and development of acquired conditions: consensus report of workgroup 3 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri- Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Periodontol. 2018; 89 ( Suppl 1 ): S237 - S248.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCortellini P, Bissada NF. Mucogingival conditions in the natural dentition: narrative review, case definitions, and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol. 2018; 89 ( Suppl 1 ): S204 - S213.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAvila- Ortiz G, Gonzalez- Martin O, Couso- Queiruga E, Wang H- L. The peri- implant phenotype. J Periodontol. Accepted for publication 17 Nov 2019.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChambrone L, Tatakis DN. Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: a systematic review from the AAP regeneration workshop. J Periodontol. 2015; 86 ( Suppl 2 ): S8 - S51.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim DM, Neiva R. Periodontal soft tissue non- root coverage procedures: a systematic review from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol. 2015; 86 ( Suppl 2 ): S56 - S72.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCairo F, Pagliaro U, Nieri M. Treatment of gingival recession with coronally advanced flap procedures: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35 ( Suppl 8 ): 136 - 162.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoaslind GD, Robertson PB, Mahan CJ, Morrison WW, Olson JV. Thickness of facial gingiva. J Periodontol. 1977; 48: 768 - 771.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMüller HP, Eger T. Gingival phenotypes in young male adults. J Clin Periodontol. 1997; 24: 65 - 71.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEgreja AM, Kahn S, Barceleiro M, Bittencourt S. Relationship between the width of the zone of keratinized tissue and thickness of gingival tissue in the anterior maxilla. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012; 32: 573 - 579.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShah R, Sowmya NK, Mehta DS. Prevalence of gingival biotype and its relationship to clinical parameters. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015; 6 ( Suppl 1 ): S167 - S171.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFischer KR, Kunzlberger A, Donos N, Fickl S, Friedmann A. Gingival biotype revised- novel classification and assessment tool. Clin Oral Invest. 2018; 22: 443 - 448.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEger T, Muller HP, Heinecke A. Ultrasonic determination of gingival thickness. Subject variation and influence of tooth type and clinical features. J Clin Periodontol. 1996; 23: 839 - 845.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook DR, Mealey BL, Verrett RG, et al. Relationship between clinical periodontal biotype and labial plate thickness: an in vivo study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011; 31: 345 - 354.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee WZ, Ong MMA, Yeo AB. Gingival profiles in a select Asian cohort: a pilot study. J Investig Clin Dent. 2018; 9 ( 1 ): e12269.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeixoto A, Marques TM, Correia A. Gingival biotype characterization- a study in a Portuguese sample. Int J Esthet Dent. 2015; 2: 534 - 546.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Periodontol. 2009; 36: 428 - 433.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMüller HP, Heinecke A, Schaller N, Eger T. Masticatory mucosa in subjects with different periodontal phenotypes. J Clin Periodontol. 2000; 27: 621 - 626.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJoshi A, Suragimath G, Zope SA, Ashwinirani SR, Varma SA. Comparison of gingival biotype between different genders based on measurement of dentopapillary complex. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017; 11: ZC40 - ZC45.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChou YH, Tsai CC, Wang JC, Ho YP, Ho KY, Tseng CC. New classification of crown forms and gingival characteristics in Taiwanese. Open Dent J. 2008; 2: 114 - 119.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee SA, Kim AC, Prusa LA, Jr., Kao RT. Characterization of dental anatomy and gingival biotype in Asian populations. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2013; 41: 36 - 39.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlsson M, Lindhe J, Marinello CP. On the relationship between crown form and clinical features of the gingiva in adolescents. J Clin Periodontol. 1993; 20: 570 - 577.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStein JM, Lintel- Höping N, Hammächer C, Kasaj A, Tamm M, Hanisch O. The gingival biotype: measurement of soft and hard tissue dimensions- a radiographic morphometric study. J Clin Periodontol. 2013; 40: 1132 - 1139.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShao Y, Yin L, Gu J, Wang D, Lu W, Sun Y. Assessment of periodontal biotype in a young Chinese population using different measurement methods. Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 11212.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStellini E, Comuzzi L, Mazzocco F, Parente N, Gobbato L. Relationships between different tooth shapes and patient’s periodontal phenotype. J Periodontal Res. 2013; 48: 657 - 662.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLa Rocca AP, Alemany AS, Levi P, Jr., Juan MV, Molina JN, Weisgold AS. Anterior maxillary and mandibular biotype: relationship between gingival thickness and width with respect to underlying bone thickness. Implant Dent. 2012; 21: 507 - 515.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGhassemian M, Lajolo C, Semeraro V, et al. Relationship between biotype and bone morphology in the lower anterior mandible: an observational study. J Periodontol. 2016; 87: 680 - 689.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlpiste- Illueca F. Dimensions of the dentogingival unit in maxillary anterior teeth: a new exploration technique (parallel profile radiograph). Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004; 24: 386 - 396.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFischer KR, Richter T, Kebschull M, Petersen N, Fickl S. On the relationship between gingival biotypes and gingival thickness in young Caucasians. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26: 865 - 869.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKolte R, Kolte A, Mahajan A. Assessment of gingival thickness with regards to age, gender and arch location. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014; 18: 478 - 481.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePascual A, Barallat L, Santos A, et al. Comparison of periodontal biotypes between maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth: a clinical and radiographic study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017; 37: 533 - 539.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlkan à , Kaya Y, Alkan EA, Keskin S, Cochran DL. Assessment of gingival biotype and keratinized gingival width of maxillary anterior region in individuals with different types of malocclusion. Turk J Orthod. 2018; 31: 13 - 20.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClaffey N, Shanley D. Relationship of gingival thickness and bleeding to loss of probing attachment in shallow sites following nonsurgical periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol. 1986; 13: 654 - 657.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMüller HP, Heinecke A. The influence of gingival dimensions on bleeding upon probing in young adults with plaque- induced gingivitis. Clin Oral Investig. 2002; 6: 69 - 74.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMüller HP, Könönen E. Variance components of gingival thickness. J Periodontal Res. 2005; 40: 239 - 244.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaroso FB, Gaio EJ, Rösing CK, Fernandes MI. Correlation between gingival thickness and gingival recession in humans. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2015; 28: 162 - 166.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiu F, Pelekos G, Jin LJ. The gingival biotype in a cohort of Chinese subjects with and without history of periodontal disease. J Periodontal Res. 2017; 52: 1004 - 1010.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Welander M, Lang NP, Lindhe J. Morphogenesis of the peri- implant mucosa: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18: 1 - 8.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jper10498.pdf
Size:
210.0KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
jper10498_am.pdf
Size:
753.9KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.