Show simple item record

Environmental Peacebuilding and the Transferability of EcoPeace Middle East’s Strategy

dc.contributor.authorLight, Andrew
dc.contributor.advisorWondolleck, Julia
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-27T18:05:18Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2020-04-27T18:05:18Z
dc.date.issued2020-05
dc.date.submitted2020-04
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/154782
dc.description.abstractEnvironmental peacebuilding is a theory of conflict management used by EcoPeace Middle East in the Jordan River Valley. The theory posits that despite a seemingly intractable conflict, communities that come together for the protection of their common natural resources can simultaneously build a foundation for peace while also helping the environment. This study assessed the potential transferability of EcoPeace’s environmental peacebuilding model to the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) in the Hindu Kush Himalayas (HKH). Two primary questions were proposed: What organizational, strategic, and contextual factors enable or constrain each organization's activities and progress?" and "What factors should EcoPeace consider when assessing the transferability of their environmental peacebuilding model to the HKH region?” In-person interviews were conducted with nine interviewees in Kathmandu, Nepal at the ICIMOD headquarters. A semi-structured interview guide was used to better understand staff perceptions of organizational, contextual, and strategic factors that influence the work being done. Additionally, publicly available information was collected to understand how those three broad factors influence the work of EcoPeace Middle East. Key limiting factors of the transfer of the environmental peacebuilding model include the genesis of the organizations, the geography and scope of the conflict being operated within, the existing international policies, and the broader strategies pursued. Additional organizational factors identified in the study include the focus of the work, funding, staffing decisions, and short-term vs. longterm progress. Other contextual factors identified include the sense of urgency in the region and additional strategic factors include data-sharing and collaboration with private industry. Despite limitations in scope, this study highlights the important organizational, contextual, and strategic factors that an organization should consider when transferring a model to another conflict or region.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectenvironmental peacebuildingen_US
dc.subjectJordan Riveren_US
dc.subjecttransboundaryen_US
dc.subjectHindu Kush Himalayasen_US
dc.titleEnvironmental Peacebuilding and the Transferability of EcoPeace Middle East’s Strategyen_US
dc.typePracticumen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenameMaster of Science (MS)en_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSchool for Environment and Sustainabilityen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberna, na
dc.identifier.uniqnamelightanden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154782/1/Light_Andrew_Practicum.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.