Environmental Justice Tools for the 21st Century
dc.contributor.author | Blondell, Molly | |
dc.contributor.author | Kobayashi, Wakako | |
dc.contributor.author | Redden, Bryan | |
dc.contributor.author | Zrzavy, Arianna | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Mohai, Paul | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-05-04T15:56:37Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2020-05-04T15:56:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-05 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-05 | |
dc.identifier | 362 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/154874 | |
dc.description.abstract | As local environmental justice (from here on EJ) issues have become increasingly prevalent in tandem with our growing global climate crisis, the Michigan Environmental Justice Coalition (MEJC) seeks to advance the use of online EJ screening tools and establish EJ policies for the state of Michigan. This research study sought to address the question, “What are the lessons that Michigan can learn regarding EJ screening tools?” There are two objectives of our research: a) to identify states that use state-specific EJ screening tools and understand how these tools are used in state-level decision-making; and b) to utilize data from our informational interviews to roadmap best practices of development and implementation to serve communities in Michigan. Following initial review of reports within their respective agencies, we conducted a series of semi-structured interviews with EJ advocates, university academics, state officials and others from the states of Washington, New York, New Jersey, Michigan, Minnesota, Maryland, and California. The data acquired from these interviews were examined using the qualitative analysis software NVIVO 12 Plus. From our analysis, we derived several themes concerning EJ screening tools that were common among states, including: a) understanding of EJ; b) current and future use of screening tools; c) limitations; d) resistance to the use of these tools; and e) metrics of success. The results of this research will inform the most efficient and inclusive processes of developing EJ screening tools in Michigan. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | environmental justice | en_US |
dc.subject | Michigan | en_US |
dc.subject | screening tool | en_US |
dc.subject | cumulative impacts | en_US |
dc.title | Environmental Justice Tools for the 21st Century | en_US |
dc.type | Project | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | Master of Science (MS) | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | School for Environment and Sustainability | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Martinez, Michelle | |
dc.identifier.uniqname | moldel | en_US |
dc.identifier.uniqname | wakakok | en_US |
dc.identifier.uniqname | reddenb | en_US |
dc.identifier.uniqname | azrzavy | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154874/1/362_EJ_Tools_for 21st_Century.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.