Building and maintaining trust in clinical decision support: Recommendations from the Patient‐Centered CDS Learning Network
dc.contributor.author | Richardson, Joshua E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Middleton, Blackford | |
dc.contributor.author | Platt, Jodyn E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Blumenfeld, Barry H. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-05-05T19:36:36Z | |
dc.date.available | WITHHELD_12_MONTHS | |
dc.date.available | 2020-05-05T19:36:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-04 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Richardson, Joshua E.; Middleton, Blackford; Platt, Jodyn E.; Blumenfeld, Barry H. (2020). "Building and maintaining trust in clinical decision support: Recommendations from the Patient‐Centered CDS Learning Network." Learning Health Systems 4(2): n/a-n/a. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2379-6146 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2379-6146 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/154962 | |
dc.description.abstract | Knowledge artifacts in digital repositories for clinical decision support (CDS) can promote the use of CDS in clinical practice. However, stakeholders will benefit from knowing which they can trust before adopting artifacts from knowledge repositories. We discuss our investigation into trust for knowledge artifacts and repositories by the Patient‐Centered CDS Learning Network’s Trust Framework Working Group (TFWG). The TFWG identified 12 actors (eg, vendors, clinicians, and policy makers) within a CDS ecosystem who each may play a meaningful role in prioritizing, authoring, implementing, or evaluating CDS and developed 33 recommendations distributed across nine “trust attributes.” The trust attributes and recommendations represent a range of considerations such as the “Competency” of knowledge artifact engineers and the “Organizational Capacity” of institutions that develop and implement CDS. The TFWG findings highlight an initial effort to make trust explicit and embedded within CDS knowledge artifacts and repositories and thus more broadly accepted and used. | |
dc.publisher | HIMSS | |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | |
dc.subject.other | decision support systems, clinical | |
dc.subject.other | health policy | |
dc.subject.other | learning health system | |
dc.subject.other | trust | |
dc.title | Building and maintaining trust in clinical decision support: Recommendations from the Patient‐Centered CDS Learning Network | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Biomedical Health Sciences | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154962/1/lrh210208.pdf | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154962/2/lrh210208_am.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/lrh2.10208 | |
dc.identifier.source | Learning Health Systems | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Middleton, B., Platt JE, Richardson JE, Blumenfeld BH. ( 2018 ) Recommendations for Building and Maintaining Trust in Clinical Decision Support Knowledge Artifacts. Research Triangle Park, NC: Patient‐Centered Clinical Decision Support Learning Network;, p. 21. Available at: https://pccds‐ln.org/tfwg (Accessed: 14 December 2018). | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hillestad R, Bigelow J, Bower A, et al. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential Health Benefits, Savings, And Costs. Health Aff. 2005; 24 ( 5 ): 1103 ‐ 1117. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1103 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Jones SS, Rudin RS, Perry T, Shekelle PG. health information technology: an updated systematic review with a focus on meaningful use. Ann Intern Med. 2014; 160 ( 1 ): 48 ‐ 54. https://doi.org/10.7326/M13‐1531 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sittig DF, Wright A, Osheroff JA, et al. Grand challenges in clinical decision support. J Biomed Inform. 2008; 41: 387 ‐ 392. doi: S1532‐0464(07)00104‐9 [pii]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2007.09.003 [doi] | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Peleg M. Computer‐interpretable clinical guidelines: a methodological review. J Biomed Inform. 2013; 46 ( 4 ): 744 ‐ 763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2013.06.009 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Greenes RA. Clinical decision support and knowledge management. Key Advances in Clinical Informatics. Elsevier. 2017; 161 ‐ 182. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978‐0‐12‐809523‐2.00012‐1 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hongsermeier, T., Maviglia S, Tsurikova L, Bogaty D, Rocha RA, Goldberg H, Meltzer S, Middleton B. ( 2011 ) ‘ A legal framework to enable sharing of Clinical Decision Support knowledge and services across institutional boundaries ’, AMIA … Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium, 2011, pp. 925–933. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ozawa S, Sripad P. How do you measure trust in the health system? A systematic review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 2013; 91: 10 ‐ 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.005 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | CDS Connect: Contract Year 1 Final Report ( 2017 ). 18‐0006‐EF. CMS Alliance to Modernize Healthcare, a federally funded research and development center operated by the MITRE Corporation, p. 42. Available at: https://healthit.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/…/cds‐connect‐year1‐final‐report.pdf (Accessed: 23 October 2018). | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Marcial LH, Richardson JE, Lasater B, et al. The imperative for patient‐centered clinical decision support. eGEMs (Generating Evidence & Methods to improve patient outcomes). 2018; 6 ( 1 ): 1 ‐ 8. https://doi.org/10.5334/egems.259 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hall MA, Dugan E, Zheng B, Mishra AK. Trust in physicians and medical institutions: what is it, can it be measured, and does it matter? Milbank Q. 2001; 79 ( 4 ): 613 ‐ 639. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Platt JE, Jacobson PD, Kardia SLR. Public trust in health information sharing: a measure of system trust. Health Serv Res. 2018; 53 ( 2 ): 824 ‐ 845. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475‐6773.12654 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Luhmann, N. and Poggi, G. ( 2005 ) Trust and power: two works. Ann Arbor, Mich: UMI Books on Demand. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | McGraw D, Dempsey JX, Harris L, Goldman J. Privacy as an enabler, not an impediment: building trust into health information exchange. Health Affairs (Project Hope). 2009; 28 ( 2 ): 416 ‐ 427. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.416 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Friedman C, Rubin J, Brown J, et al. Toward a science of learning systems: a research agenda for the high‐functioning Learning Health System. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014: 43 ‐ 50. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl‐2014‐002977 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Everson, J. ( 2018 ) Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement | HealthIT.gov. Washington DC: Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Available at: https://www.healthit.gov/topic/interoperability/trusted‐exchange‐framework‐and‐common‐agreement (Accessed: 6 July 2018). | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Boxwala AA, Rocha BH, Maviglia S, et al. A multi‐layered framework for disseminating knowledge for computer‐based decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011; 18 ( Suppl 1 ): i132 ‐ i139. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl‐2011‐000334 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | GRADE Welcome to the GRADE working group ( 2018 ) GRADE. Available at: http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/ (Accessed: 14 December 2018). | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Digital Health Software Precertification (Pre‐Cert) Program ( 2018 ) U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/digitalhealth/digitalhealthprecertprogram/default.htm (Accessed: 13 December 2018). | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Nosek BA, Alter G, Banks GC, et al. Promoting an open research culture. Science. 2015; 348 ( 6242 ): 1422 ‐ 1425. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | TOP Guidelines ( 2018 ) Center for Open Science. Available at: https://cos.io/our‐services/top‐guidelines/ (Accessed: 14 December 2018). | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Representation of Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations in FHIR ( 2019 ) HL7. Available at: http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/cqf‐recommendations/ (Accessed: 30 May 2019). | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | EBMonFHIR ‐ Clinical Decision Support ‐ Confluence ( 2019 ). Available at: https://confluence.hl7.org/display/cds/ebmonfhir (Accessed: 30 May 2019). | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Osheroff JA, Teich J, Levick D, et al. Improving outcomes with clinical decision support: an implementer’s guide. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: HIMSS; 2012. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Osheroff JA, Teich JM, Middleton B, Steen EB, Wright A, Detmer DE. A roadmap for national action on clinical decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007; 14 ( 2 ): 141 ‐ 145. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Wang S, et al. Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence‐based medicine a reality. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003; 10 ( 6 ): 523 ‐ 530. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1370 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Middleton B. The clinical decision support consortium. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009; 150: 26 ‐ 30. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Middleton B, Sittig DF, Wright A. Clinical decision support: a 25 year retrospective and a 25 year vision. Yearb Med Inform. 2016;( Suppl 1 ): S103 ‐ S116. https://doi.org/10.15265/IYS‐2016‐s034 | |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.