The Rise of Algorithmic Work: Implications for Organizational Control and Worker Autonomy
Cameron, Lindsey
2020
Abstract
In less than a decade the on-demand economy, a labor market characterized by short-term contracts where work is coordinated through algorithms, has radically reshaped organizations, employment relationships, workers’ lives, and consumer behaviors. Despite optimistic and pessimistic predictions, few studies have examined how algorithms affect work and workers in practice. This dissertation focuses on understanding the impact of algorithms on workers in an environment where the entire human resource cycle is coordinated by algorithms. Existing organizational theories suggest that algorithmic systems will tighten the iron cage by providing more comprehensive and invasive methods of control. This dissertation, however, reveals the myriad ways that workers find autonomy in an algorithmic work environment. To theorize this central finding, I draw upon field work collected from the ride hailing industry, the largest sector in the on-demand economy. I begin with an overview of some of the changes in the contemporary workplace highlighting how they may challenge and extend mainstream organizational theories. I follow with a review of the on-demand economy, including its predecessors of production and service work, and how it affects workers, consumers, and communities. Next, I describe how algorithm-based control systems differ from prior systems and conceptualize algorithmic work—a set of job-related activities that are structured by algorithms—drawing on a synthesis of literature across six social science disciplines. I conclude this chapter with unexplored questions at the nexus of work, workers, and algorithms. In the two empirical papers, I draw on participant observation (including three years as a driver and a rider), longitudinal interviews, online archival data and focus groups. In the first study, I examine how workers interpret the insecure work conditions inherent in the on-demand economy. Focusing on the practices and perspectives of the two most salient features of their work environment—customers and technology—I explore how these interactions lead drivers to understand their work. Seeing their relationship with work as either an alliance or as adversarial, workers tend to view features of the work environment as either working on their behalf or against them. Over time these practices and perspectives culminate in different outcomes. In the second study, I begin by describing how algorithm-based control systems differ from prior systems and conceptualize algorithmic work. Algorithms manage by structuring choice at each human-algorithm interaction, to which drivers respond with a set of tactics: compliance, engagement, or deviance. While these tactics appear to be at odds, drivers describe their responses as evidence of their personal autonomy, in that the system allows them to maximize earnings and create a continuous stream of work from a discontinuous set of tasks. This autonomy demonstrates that although the algorithmic-manager may be an unforgiving taskmaster, workers perceive otherwise, thus suggesting that workers feel they have more autonomy in algorithmic rather than traditional work. This dissertation provides several theoretical and empirical contributions. First, I summarize perspectives of algorithms across the social sciences laying out several unanswered questions at the intersection of work, organizations, and algorithms. Further, I propose a definition of how algorithms operate in the workplace which I expand on. In contrast to iron cage metaphors, this dissertation suggests that workers do indeed experience a great deal of autonomy in the algorithmic workplace. This study thus has implications for our understanding of algorithms, organizational control, autonomy and the meaning of work.Subjects
Algorithms On-Demand/Gig Economy Autonomy Organizational Control Uber/Lyft Meaning of Work
Types
Thesis
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.