Show simple item record

Demographics and the Insurance Decision: Examining the effect of Section 2001(a) temporally among demographics.

dc.contributor.authorReynolds, Lucas Victor
dc.contributor.advisorMiller, Sarah
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-12T12:15:15Z
dc.date.available2020-05-12T12:15:15Z
dc.date.issued2020-04
dc.identifierBA 480en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/155344
dc.description.abstractThis thesis analyzes the impartiality of the policy effect of Section 2001(a) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”). Section 2001(a) amended the Social Security Act expanding Medicaid eligibility to those making up to 138% of the federal poverty line. To do so, this thesis focuses on the population making 100-138% of the federal poverty line and four different groups of states. These groups were non-expansion states (states where Medicaid was never expanded under Section 2001(a) of the ACA), traditional expansion states (states where Medicaid was expanded as intended by Section 2001(a) (i.e. beginning on January 1, 2014)), and two groups of “delayed expansion” states: 2015-expansion states, and 2016 expansion states. The research questions which this paper addresses are: 1. Were certain groups or demographics of the population in the 100-138% of the Federal Poverty Level effected differently by the Medicaid expansion policy of the ACA under Section 2001(a)? 2. Did a state’s temporal decision to expand Medicaid result in a substantial difference between the same demographic in a different group of states? 3. If either of the previous two questions are answered in the affirmative, did certain demographics behave differently across groups with respect to Medicaid participation? I find the legislative action of Section 2001(a) affected no demographic significantly differently than another. I also find that there is no substantial difference in Medicaid adoption between groups depending on expansion date if a state expanded Medicaid. In my findings, there is a puzzling trend occurring in the black and Hispanic demographics in delayed expansion states. These two demographics have decreases in the proportion occurring post-implantation in delayed expansionary environments. It is a puzzling trend I observe only occurs in the delayed expansion groups and only in the black and Hispanic demographics. I offer a specific explanation to why this may happen.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subject.classificationBusiness Administrationen_US
dc.titleDemographics and the Insurance Decision: Examining the effect of Section 2001(a) temporally among demographics.en_US
dc.typeProjecten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBusiness (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusiness and Economics
dc.contributor.affiliationumRoss School of Businessen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arbor
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/155344/1/Lucas Reynolds_BA 480 Written Report.pdf
dc.owningcollnameBusiness, Stephen M. Ross School of - Senior Thesis Written Reports


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.