Show simple item record

Patient and provider‐level barriers to hepatitis C screening and linkage to care: A mixed‐methods evaluation

dc.contributor.authorHigashi, Robin T.
dc.contributor.authorJain, Mamta K.
dc.contributor.authorQuirk, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorRich, Nicole E.
dc.contributor.authorWaljee, Akbar K.
dc.contributor.authorTurner, Barbara J.
dc.contributor.authorLee, Simon Craddock
dc.contributor.authorSingal, Amit G.
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-02T20:32:29Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHS
dc.date.available2020-07-02T20:32:29Z
dc.date.issued2020-07
dc.identifier.citationHigashi, Robin T.; Jain, Mamta K.; Quirk, Lisa; Rich, Nicole E.; Waljee, Akbar K.; Turner, Barbara J.; Lee, Simon Craddock; Singal, Amit G. (2020). "Patient and provider‐level barriers to hepatitis C screening and linkage to care: A mixed‐methods evaluation." Journal of Viral Hepatitis 27(7): 680-689.
dc.identifier.issn1352-0504
dc.identifier.issn1365-2893
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/155892
dc.description.abstractAchieving practice change can be challenging when guidelines shift from a selective risk‐based strategy to a broader population health strategy, as occurred for hepatitis C (HCV) screening (2012‐2013). We aimed to evaluate patient and provider barriers that contributed to suboptimal HCV screening and linkage‐to‐care rates after implementation of an intervention to improve HCV screening and linkage‐to‐care processes in a large, public integrated healthcare system following the guidelines change. As part of a mixed‐methods study, we collected data through patient surveys (n = 159), focus groups (n = 9) and structured observation of providers and staff (n = 9). We used these findings to then inform domains for the second phase, which consisted of semi‐structured interviews with patients across the screening‐treatment continuum (n = 24) and providers and staff at primary care and hepatology clinics (n = 21). We transcribed and thematically analysed interviews using an integrated inductive and deductive framework. We identified lack of clarity about treatment cost, treatment complications and likelihood of cure as ongoing patient‐level barriers to screening and linkage to care. Provider‐level barriers included scepticism about establishing HCV screening as a quality metric given competing clinical priorities, particularly for patients with multiple comorbidities. However, most felt positively about adding HCV as a quality metric to enhance HCV screening and linkage to care. Provider engagement yielded suggestions for process improvements that resulted in increased stakeholder buy‐in and real‐time enhancements to the HCV screening process intervention. Systematic data collection at baseline and during practice change implementation may facilitate adoption and adaptation to improve HCV screening guideline implementation. Findings identified several key opportunities and lessons to enhance the impact of practice change interventions to improve HCV screening and treatment delivery.
dc.publisherSage
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherqualitative research
dc.subject.otherelectronic health records
dc.subject.otherpopulation health
dc.subject.otherprogramme evaluation
dc.subject.otherquality improvement
dc.titlePatient and provider‐level barriers to hepatitis C screening and linkage to care: A mixed‐methods evaluation
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/155892/1/jvh13278.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/155892/2/jvh13278_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jvh.13278
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Viral Hepatitis
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCastrejon M, Chew KW, Javanbakht M, Humphries R, Saab S. Klausner JD: Implementation of a large system‐wide hepatitis c virus screening and linkage to care program for baby boomers. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017; 4 ( 3 ): ofx109.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTomoaia‐Cotisel A, Scammon DL, Waitzman NJ, et al. Context matters: the experience of 14 research teams in systematically reporting contextual factors important for practice change. Ann Fam Med. 2013; 11 ( suppl 1 ): S115 ‐ S123.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinal recommendation statement: Hepatitis c: Screening [ https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/RecommendationStatementFinal/hepatitis-c-screening ]. Accessed November 30, 2019.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJain MK, Rich NE, Ahn C, et al. Evaluation of a multifaceted intervention to reduce health disparities in hepatitis c screening: a pre‐post analysis. Hepatology (Baltimore, MD). 2019; 70 ( 1 ): 40 ‐ 50.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStangl AL, Brady L, Fritz K. International center for research on women: measuring HIV stigma and discrimination. In. Washington, DC: Strive; 2012.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerger BE, Ferrans CE, Lashley FR. Measuring stigma in people with HIV: psychometric assessment of the HIV stigma scale. Res Nurs Health. 2001; 24 ( 6 ): 518 ‐ 529.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStuart H. Reducing the stigma of mental illness. Global Mental Health (Camb). 2016; 3: e17.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarroso J, Relf MV, Williams MS, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of a stigma reduction intervention for HIV‐infected women in the deep south. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2014; 28 ( 9 ): 489 ‐ 498.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWillis GB. Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2005.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNapoles‐Springer AM, Santoyo‐Olsson J, O’Brien H, Stewart AL. Using cognitive interviews to develop surveys in diverse populations. Med Care. 2006; 44 ( 11 suppl 3 ): S21 ‐ 30.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoyle C, Kwakwa H, Viner K. Integrating routine HCV testing in primary care: lessons learned from five federally qualified health centers in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2012–2014. Public Health Rep. 2016; 131 ( 2_suppl ): 65 ‐ 73.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTurner BJ, Taylor BS, Hanson JT, et al. Implementing hospital‐based baby boomer hepatitis c virus screening and linkage to care: Strategies, results, and costs. J Hosp Med. 2015; 10 ( 8 ): 510 ‐ 516.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKonerman MA, Thomson M, Gray K, Moore M, Choxi H, Seif E. Lok AS: Impact of an electronic health record alert in primary care on increasing hepatitis c screening and curative treatment for baby boomers. Hepatology. 2017; 66 ( 6 ): 1805 ‐ 1813.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFederman AD, Kil N, Kannry J, et al. An electronic health record‐based intervention to promote hepatitis c virus testing among adults born between 1945 and 1965: a cluster‐randomized trial. Med Care. 2017; 55 ( 6 ): 590 ‐ 597.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoel A, Sanchez J, Paulino L, et al. A systematic model improves hepatitis c virus birth cohort screening in hospital‐based primary care. J Viral Hepat. 2017; 24 ( 6 ): 477 ‐ 485.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTurner BJ, Craig K, Makanji VS, Flores BE, Hernandez L. Improving support and education of low‐income baby boomers diagnosed with chronic hepatitis c virus infection through universal screening. J Clin Nurs. 2017; 26 ( 23–24 ): 4605 ‐ 4612.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLebovics E, Torres R, Porter LK. Primary care perspectives on hepatitis c virus screening, diagnosis and linking patients to appropriate care. Am J Med. 2017; 130 ( 2 ): S1 ‐ s2.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSingal AG, Tiro JA, Murphy CC, et al. Mailed outreach invitations significantly improve hcc surveillance rates in patients with cirrhosis: a randomized clinical trial. Hepatology (Baltimore, MD). 2019; 69 ( 1 ): 121 ‐ 130.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSingal AG, Gupta S, Skinner CS, et al. Effect of colonoscopy outreach vs fecal immunochemical test outreach on colorectal cancer screening completion: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017; 9: 806.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMauger B, Marbella A, Pines E, Chopra R, Black ER, Aronson N. Implementing quality improvement strategies to reduce healthcare‐associated infections: a systematic review. Am J Infect Control. 2014; 42 ( 10 suppl ): S274 ‐ S283.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHepatitis c diagnostic testing, HCV testing sequence. [ https://www.hepatitisc.uw.edu/go/screening-diagnosis/diagnostic-testing/core-concept/all ]. Accessed November 30, 2019.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.