View Item 

Show simple item record

In the Fabric of Research: Racial and Gender Stereotypes in Survey Items Assessing Attitudes about Abortion
dc.contributor.authorMcClelland, Sara I.
dc.contributor.authorDutcher, Harley
dc.contributor.authorCrawford, Brandon
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-02T20:33:39Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_12_MONTHS
dc.date.available2020-07-02T20:33:39Z
dc.date.issued2020-06
dc.identifier.citationMcClelland, Sara I.; Dutcher, Harley; Crawford, Brandon (2020). "In the Fabric of Research: Racial and Gender Stereotypes in Survey Items Assessing Attitudes about Abortion." Journal of Social Issues 76(2): 239-269.
dc.identifier.issn0022-4537
dc.identifier.issn1540-4560
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/155945
dc.description.abstractWe investigated the content of survey items to assess whether and how racist and sexist stereotypes are woven into the fabric of research on attitudes about abortion in the United States. We collected and analyzed a comprehensive set of survey items (456 items from 80 studies) used in peer‐reviewed research published from 2008 to 2018 in representative and nonrepresentative studies of U.S. respondents. Our analysis was guided by historical narratives that have been influential in shaping representations of women and reproduction in the United States (e.g., the Moynihan Report). With this background, we developed three themes pertaining to how individuals’ attitudes about abortion are measured: we found that items rely on (1) moral, (2) sexual, and (3) financial evaluations of women seeking abortion care. These themes highlighted implicit and explicit judgments of women, including representations of them as unwilling to partner with men and as fiscally and sexually irresponsible. We argue that survey items meant to objectively assess abortion attitudes draw on negative racial and gender stereotypes and that these stereotypes then travel widely under the veneer of scientific objectivity. Critical methods, such as the item bank analysis described in this study, are crucial to discern how inequality, prejudice, and discrimination can be reproduced in the fabric of research methods. In our discussion, we offer suggestions for researchers to reduce these and related forms of bias in survey‐based abortion research.
dc.publisherErlbaum
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.titleIn the Fabric of Research: Racial and Gender Stereotypes in Survey Items Assessing Attitudes about Abortion
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Work
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/155945/1/josi12367_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/155945/2/josi12367.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/josi.12367
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Social Issues
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoss, L., & Solinger, R. ( 2017 ). Reproductive justice: An introduction (Vol. 1 ). Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSinger, E., & Couper, M. P. ( 2014 ). The effect of question wording on attitudes toward prenatal testing and abortion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78, 751 – 760. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu028
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSinger, E., Couper, M. P., Raghunathan, T. E., Van Hoewyk, J., & Antonucci, T. C. ( 2008 ). Trends in U.S. attitudes toward genetic testing, 1990–2004. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 446 – 458. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn033
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSireci, S. G. ( 1998 ). The construct of content validity. Social Indicators Research, 45, 83 – 117. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006985528729
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, E., Sundstrom, B., & Delay, C. ( 2020 ). Listening to women: Understanding and challenging systems of power to achieve reproductive justice in South Carolina. Journal of Social Issues.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, T. W. ( 2016 ). The general social surveys. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, T. W., & Son, J. ( 2013 ). Trends in public attitudes towards abortion. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSociocultural Research Consultants. ( 2018 ). Dedoose, web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data (Version 8.0.35). Los Angeles, CA: LLC.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwigger, N. ( 2016 ). Sexual responsibility and the politics of abortion and contraception. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 13, 263 – 275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-015-0214-9
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTavris, C. ( 1993 ). The mismeasure of woman. Feminism & Psychology, 3, 149 – 168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353593032002
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTeo, T. ( 2010 ). What is epistemological violence in the empirical social sciences? Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 295 – 303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00265.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTerry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. ( 2017 ). Thematic analysis. In C. Willig & W. R. Stainton‐Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 17 – 37 ). London, UK: Sage.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTurcotte, J., Medenilla, K., Villaseñor, K., & Lampwalla, S. ( 2017 ). All the polling (data) that’s fit to print? An analysis of online news coverage of 2016 primary polls. Communication Research Reports, 34, 191 – 200. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2017.1282856
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVolscho, T. W. ( 2010 ). Sterilization racism and pan‐ethnic disparities of the past decade: The continued encroachment on reproductive rights. Wicazo Sa Review, 25, 17 – 31. https://doi.org/10.1353/wic.0.0053
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWestbrook, L., & Saperstein, A. ( 2015 ). New categories are not enough: Rethinking the measurement of sex and gender in social surveys. Gender & Society, 29, 534 – 560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243215584758
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWestoff, C. F., & Ryder, N. B. ( 1965 ). National fertility survey. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter‐university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWittenbrink, B., & Henly, J. R. ( 1996 ). Creating social reality: Informational social influence and the content of stereotypic beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 598 – 610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296226005
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWoodhams, E. J., Hill, B. J., Fabiyi, C., & Gilliam, M. ( 2016 ). Describing abortion attitudes among young, African American men. Contraception, 94, 134 – 136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.03.008
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZigerell, L. J., & Rice, H. M. ( 2011 ). Intense ambivalence: The new 2006 and 2008 ANES abortion attitude measures. In J. H. Aldrich & K. M. McGraw (Eds.), Improving public opinion surveys: Interdisciplinary innovation and the American National Election Studies (pp. 303 – 322 ). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbrams, P. ( 2012 ). The scarlet letter: The Supreme Court and the language of abortion stigma. Michigan Journal of Gender & Law, 19, 293 – 337. Retrieved from https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/mjgl19&i=303
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAjzen, I., & Fishbein, M. ( 2005 ). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173 – 221 ). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllport, G. W. ( 1954 ). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArney, W. R., & Trescher, W. H. ( 1976 ). Trends in attitudes toward abortion, 1972–1975. Family Planning Perspectives, 8, 117 – 124. https://doi.org/10.2307/2133633
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarkan, S. E. ( 2014 ). Gender and abortion attitudes: Religiosity as a suppressor variable. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78, 940 – 950. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu047
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarnartt, S. N., & Harris, R. J. ( 1982 ). Recent changes in predictors of abortion attitudes. Sociology & Social Research, 66, 320 – 334.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBegun, S., & Walls, N. E. ( 2015 ). Pedestal or gutter: Exploring ambivalent sexism’s relationship with abortion attitudes. Affilia, 30, 200 – 215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109914555216
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBenjamin, R. ( 2015 ). The emperor’s new genes: Science, public policy, and the allure of objectivity. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 661, 130 – 142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215587859
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBennett, C. L., McDonald, D. A., Finch, A., Rennie, S., & Morse, J. E. ( 2018 ). North Carolina medical student views on abortion. North Carolina Medical Journal, 79, 14 – 19. Retrieved from http://www.ncmedicaljournal.com/content/79/1/14.short
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBensonsmith, D. ( 2005 ). Jezebels, matriarchs, and welfare queens: The Moynihan Report of 1965 and the social construction of African‐American women in welfare policy. In A. L. Schneider & H. M. Ingram (Eds.), Deserving and entitled: Social constructions of public policy (pp. 243 – 260 ). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBohner, G. ( 2001 ). Writing about rape: Use of the passive voice and other distancing text features as an expression of perceived responsibility of the victim. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 515 – 529. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164957
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoonstra, H. D. ( 2007 ). The heart of the matter: Public funding of abortion for poor women in the United States. Guttmacher Policy Review, 10, 12 – 16. Retrieved from https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/article_files/gpr100112.pdf
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoudreau, C., & McCubbins, M. D. ( 2010 ). The blind leading the blind: Who gets polling information and does it improve decisions? The Journal of Politics, 72, 513 – 527. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609990946
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBridges, K. M., Keel, T., & Obasogie, O. K. ( 2017 ). Introduction: Critical race theory and the health sciences. American Journal of Law & Medicine, 43, 179 – 182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098858817723657
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown‐Iannuzzi, J. L., Dotsch, R., Cooley, E., & Payne, B. K. ( 2017 ). The relationship between mental representations of welfare recipients and attitudes toward welfare. Psychological Science, 28, 92 – 103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616674999
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBumpass, L. L. ( 1997 ). The measurement of public opinion on abortion: The effects of survey design. Family Planning Perspectives, 29, 177 – 180. https://doi.org/10.2307/2953382
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCallaghan, T., & Olson, A. ( 2017 ). Unearthing the hidden welfare state: Race, political attitudes, and unforeseen consequences. The Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics, 2, 63 – 87. https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2016.26
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCamobreco, J. F., & Barnello, M. A. ( 2008 ). Democratic responsiveness and policy shock: The case of state abortion policy. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 8, 48 – 65. https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000800800104
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCampbell, D. T. ( 1950 ). The indirect assessment of social attitudes. Psychological Bulletin, 47, 15 – 38. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054114
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCanan, S. N., & Jozkowski, K. N. ( 2017 ). Sexual health education topics in schools: Inclusion and timing preferences of a sample of southern U.S. college students. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 14, 143 – 156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-016-0251-z
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarter, J. S., Carter, S. K., & Dodge, J. ( 2009 ). Trends in abortion attitudes by race and gender: A reassessment over a four decade period. Journal of Sociological Research, 1, 1 – 17. https://doi.org/10.5296/jsr.v1i1.156
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChavez, L. R. ( 2004 ). A glass half empty: Latina reproduction and public discourse. Human Organization, 63, 173 – 188. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.63.2.hmk4m0mfey10n51k
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCockrill, K., & Nack, A. ( 2013 ). “I’m not that type of person”: Managing the stigma of having an abortion. Deviant Behavior, 34, 973 – 990. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2013.800423
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCole, E. R. ( 2009 ). Intersectionality and research in psychology. The American Psychologist, 64, 170 – 180. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014564
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCooper, B. ( 2015 ). Intersectionality. In L. Disch & M. Hawkesworth (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of feminist theory (pp. 385 – 406 ). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199328581.013.20
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCooper, T. ( 2016 ). Race, class, and abortion: How liberation theology enhances the demand for Reproductive Justice. Feminist Theology, 24, 226 – 244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0966735015627970
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCox, W. T., & Devine, P. G. ( 2015 ). Stereotypes possess heterogeneous directionality: A theoretical and empirical exploration of stereotype structure and content. PLoS One, 10, 1 – 27. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122292
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCraig, R. ( 2014 ). Polls, expectations, and elections: TV news making in US presidential campaigns. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeJean, S. L., McGeorge, C. R., & Stone Carlson, T. ( 2012 ). Attitudes toward never‐married single mothers and fathers: Does gender matter? Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 24, 121 – 138. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952833.2012.648121
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeWalt, D. A., Rothrock, N., Yount, S., & Stone, A. A. ( 2007 ). Evaluation of item candidates: The PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care, 45 (5 Suppl 1), S12 – S21. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000254567.79743.e2
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDodge, L. E., Haider, S., & Hacker, M. R. ( 2016 ). Attitudes toward abortion among providers of reproductive health care. Women’s Health Issues, 26, 511 – 516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2016.06.005
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElo, S., & Kyngäs, H. ( 2008 ). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 107 – 115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEly, G. E., Flaherty, C., Akers, L. S., & Noland, T. B. ( 2012 ). Social work student attitudes toward the social work perspective on abortion. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 9, 34 – 45.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEntman, R. M. ( 1993 ). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51 – 58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFazio, R. H. ( 1990 ). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75 – 109 ). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFine, M. ( 2012 ). Troubling calls for evidence: A critical race, class and gender analysis of whose evidence counts. Feminism & Psychology, 22, 3 – 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353511435475
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFine, M., & McClelland, S. I. ( 2007 ). The politics of teen women’s sexuality: Public policy and the adolescent female body. Emory Law Journal, 56, 993 – 1038. Retrieved from https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/emlj56&i=1005
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFoster, D. G., Gould, H., & Kimport, K. ( 2012 ). How women anticipate coping after an abortion. Contraception, 86, 84 – 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.11.002
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGilens, M. ( 1999 ). Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226293660.001.0001
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrabe, S., Ramirez, D. R., & Dutt, A. ( 2020 ). Reproductive justice: The role of community‐based organizational participation in reproductive decision‐making and educational aspiration among women in Nicaragua. Journal of Social Issues.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGranberg, D., & Granberg, B. W. ( 1980 ). Abortion attitudes, 1965–1980: Trends and determinants. Family Planning Perspectives, 12, 250 – 261. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/2134868
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrzanka, P. R., & Frantell, K. A. ( 2017 ). Counseling psychology and reproductive justice: A call to action. The Counseling Psychologist, 45, 326 – 352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000017699871
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrzanka, P. R., & Schuch, E. ( 2020 ). Reproductive anxiety and conditional agency at the intersections of privilege: A focus group study of emerging adults’ perception of long‐acting reversible contraception. Journal of Social Issues.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuttmacher Institute. ( 2018, December 10). State abortion policy landscape: From hostile to supportive. Retrieved from https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2018/12/state-abortion-policy-landscape-hostile-supportive
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHahn, E. A., DeVellis, R. F., Bode, R. K., Garcia, S. F., Castel, L. D., Eisen, S. V., … & PROMIS Cooperative Group. ( 2010 ). Measuring social health in the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Item bank development and testing. Quality of Life Research, 19, 1035 – 1044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9654-0
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHans, J. D., & Kimberly, C. ( 2014 ). Abortion attitudes in context: A multidimensional vignette approach. Social Science Research, 48, 145 – 156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.06.001
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHassell, H. J., & Visalvanich, N. ( 2015 ). Call to (in)action: The effects of racial priming on grassroots mobilization. Political Behavior, 37, 911 – 932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-014-9297-x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHegarty, P. ( 2007 ). Getting dirty: Psychology’s history of power. History of Psychology, 10, 75 – 91. https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.10.2.75
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHegarty, P., & Buechel, C. ( 2006 ). Androcentric reporting of gender differences in APA journals: 1965–2004. Review of General Psychology, 10, 377 – 389. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.10.4.377
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHout, M., & Hastings, O. ( 2016 ). Reliability of the core items in the General Social Survey: Estimates from the three‐wave panels, 2006–2014. Sociological Science, 3, 971 – 1002. https://doi.org/10.15195/v3.a43
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuang, Y., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. ( 2020 ). Breast is best, but where? Benevolent and hostile sexism underlies women’s opposition to public breastfeeding. Journal of Social Issues.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJelen, T. G., Damore, D. F., & Lamatsch, T. ( 2002 ). Gender, employment status, and abortion: A longitudinal analysis. Sex Roles, 47, 321 – 330. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021427014047
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJelen, T. G., & Wilcox, C. ( 2003 ). Causes and consequences of public attitudes toward abortion: A review and research agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 489 – 500. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600410
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJozkowski, K. N., Crawford, B. L., & Hunt, M. E. ( 2018 ). Complexity in attitudes toward abortion access: Results from two studies. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 15, 464 – 482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-018-0322-4
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKandola, S. S., & Egan, V. ( 2014 ). Individual differences underlying attitudes to the death penalty. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 48 – 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.005
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKillen, K. ( 2019 ). “Can you hear me now?” Race, motherhood, and the politics of being heard. Politics & Gender, 15, 623 – 644. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X18000697
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKohler‐Hausmann, J. ( 2015 ). Welfare crises, penal solutions, and the origins of the “welfare queen.” Journal of Urban History, 41, 756 – 771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144215589942
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaMarre, A., Rice, C., Cook, K., & Friedman, M. ( 2020 ). Fat reproductive justice: Navigating the boundaries of reproductive health care. Journal of Social Issues.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLei, R. F., & Bodenhausen, G. V. ( 2017 ). Racial assumptions color the mental representation of social class. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1 – 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00519
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLenhardt, R. A. ( 2016 ). Black citizenship through marriage: Reflections on the Moynihan Report at fifty. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 25, 347 – 362. Retrieved from https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/scid25&i=351
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. ( 2012 ). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 106 – 131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiu, M. ( 2018 ). Data collection mode effect on abortion questions: A comparison of face‐to‐face and web surveys. Gender and Women’s Studies, 1, 1 – 10. https://doi.org/10.31532/GendWomensStud.1.1.002
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiu, M., Lee, S., & Conrad, F. G. ( 2015 ). Comparing extreme response styles between agree-disagree and item-specific scales. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79, 952 – 975. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfv034
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCabe, B. J., & Heerwig, J. A. ( 2011 ). Reframing the marriage debate: Wording, context, and intensity of support for marriage and civil unions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24, 429 – 449. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr025
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcClelland, S. I. ( 2010 ). Intimate justice: A critical analysis of sexual satisfaction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 663 – 680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00293.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcClelland, S. I. ( 2011 ). Who is the “self” in self reports of sexual satisfaction? Research and policy implications. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 8, 304 – 320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-011-0067-9
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcClelland, S. I. ( 2017 ). Conceptual disruption: The self‐anchored ladder in critical feminist research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41, 451 – 464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317725985
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcClelland, S. I. ( 2018 ). Critical methods for studying adolescent sexuality. In S. Lamb & J. Gilbert (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sexuality: Childhood and adolescence (pp. 281 – 299 ). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcClelland, S. I., & Fine, M. ( 2008 ). Embedded science: Critical analysis of abstinence‐only evaluation research. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 8, 50 – 81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708607310782
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcClelland, S., & Holland, K. ( 2016 ). Toward better measurement: The role of survey marginalia in critical sexuality research. Qualitative Psychology, 3, 166 – 185. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000056
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMerton, R., & Wolfe, A. ( 1995 ). The cultural and social incorporation of sociological knowledge. The American Sociologist, 26, 15 – 39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692031
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMessick, S. ( 1989 ). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), The American Council on Education/Macmillan series on higher education. Educational measurement (pp. 13 – 103 ). Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc; American Council on Education.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMohamed, H. S. ( 2018 ). Embryonic politics: Attitudes about abortion, stem cell research, and IVF. Politics and Religion, 11, 459 – 497. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175504831800010X
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoy, P., & Rinke, E. M. ( 2012 ). Attitudinal and behavioral consequences of published opinion polls. In C. Holtz‐Bacha & J. Strömbäck (Eds.), Opinion polls and the media (pp. 225 – 245 ). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoynihan, D. P. ( 1965 ). The Negro family: The case for national action. Washington, DC: Office of Policy Planning and Research, U.S. Department of Labor.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMuthén, B. ( 1981 ). Factor analysis of dichotomous variables: American attitudes toward abortion. In D. J. Jackson & E. F. Borgatta (Eds.), Factor analysis and measurement in sociological research: A multidimensional perspective (pp. 407 – 419 ). London, UK: Sage.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNadasen, P. ( 2007 ). From widow to “welfare queen”: Welfare and the politics of race. Black Women, Gender + Families, 1, 52 – 77. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/blacwomegendfami.1.2.0052
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNelson, T. E. ( 1999 ). Group affect and attribution in social policy opinion. The Journal of Politics, 61, 331 – 362. https://doi.org/10.2307/2647507
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNelson, T. E., & Kinder, D. R. ( 1996 ). Issue frames and group‐centrism in American public opinion. The Journal of Politics, 58, 1055 – 1078. https://doi.org/10.2307/2960149
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOnwuachi‐Willig, A. ( 2005 ). The return of the ring: Welfare reform’s marriage cure as the revival of post‐bellum control. California Law Review, 93, 1647 – 1696. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38G990
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOpotow, S. ( 1990 ). Moral exclusion and injustice: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 1 – 20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb00268.x
dc.identifier.citedreferencePayne, S. L. B. ( 2014 ). The art of asking questions: Studies in public opinion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRice, W. S., Turan, B., Stringer, K. L., Helova, A., White, K., Cockrill, K., & Turan, J. M. ( 2017 ). Norms and stigma regarding pregnancy decisions during an unintended pregnancy: Development and predictors of scales among young women in the U.S. South. PLoS One, 12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174210
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRiggs, D. W., & Bartholomaeus, C. ( 2020 ). Towards trans reproductive justice: A qualitative analysis of views on fertility preservation for Australian transgender and non‐binary people. Journal of Social Issues.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoberts, D. ( 1997 ). Killing the Black body: Race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenbaum, P. J., & Valsiner, J. ( 2011 ). The un‐making of a method: From rating scales to the study of psychological processes. Theory & Psychology, 21, 47 – 65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309352913
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenthal, L., & Lobel, M. ( 2016 ). Stereotypes of Black American women related to sexuality and motherhood. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40, 414 – 427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315627459
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRossi, A. S., & Sitaraman, B. ( 1988 ). Abortion in context: Historical trends and future changes. Family Planning Perspectives, 20, 273–281+301. https://doi.org/10.2307/2135483
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRossi, P. H., Wright, J. D., & Anderson, A. B. ( Eds. ) ( 2013 ). Handbook of survey research. New York, NY: Academic Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchram, S. F. ( 2005 ). Putting a Black face on welfare: The good and the bad. In A. L. Schneider & H. M. Ingram (Eds.), Deserving and entitled: Social constructions of public policy (pp. 261 – 286 ). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchuman, H., & Presser, S. ( 1981 ). Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording, and context. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchuman, H., & Scott, J. ( 1987 ). Problems in the use of survey questions to measure public opinion. Science, 236, 957 – 959. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.236.4804.957
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwarz, N. ( 2007 ). Attitude construction: Evaluation in context. Social Cognition, 25, 638 – 656. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.638
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwarz, N. ( 2008 ). Attitude measurement. In W. D. Crano & R. Prislin (Eds.), Attitudes and attitude change (pp. 41 – 60 ). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwarz, N., & Bohner, G. ( 2001 ). The construction of attitudes. In A. Tesser & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Intrapersonal processes: Blackwell handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 436 – 457 ). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShammas, D. ( 2017 ). Underreporting discrimination among Arab American and Muslim American community college students: Using focus groups to unravel the ambiguities within the survey data. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11, 99 – 123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815599467
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShammas, D. S. ( 2009 ). Post‐9/11 Arab and Muslim American community college students: Ethno‐religious enclaves and perceived discrimination. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 33, 283 – 308. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668920802580507
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSidanius, J., & Pratto, F. ( 2001 ). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
josi12367_am.pdf
Size:
1.149MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
josi12367.pdf
Size:
249.4KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.