Show simple item record

Influenza vaccine effectiveness among outpatients in the US Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network by study site 2011‐2016

dc.contributor.authorBalasubramani, Goundappa K.
dc.contributor.authorNowalk, Mary Patricia
dc.contributor.authorSax, Theresa M.
dc.contributor.authorSuyama, Joe
dc.contributor.authorBobyock, Emily
dc.contributor.authorRinaldo, Charles R.
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Emily T.
dc.contributor.authorMonto, Arnold S.
dc.contributor.authorJackson, Michael L.
dc.contributor.authorGaglani, Manjusha J.
dc.contributor.authorFlannery, Brendan
dc.contributor.authorChung, Jessie R.
dc.contributor.authorZimmerman, Richard K.
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-02T20:34:22Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHS
dc.date.available2020-07-02T20:34:22Z
dc.date.issued2020-07
dc.identifier.citationBalasubramani, Goundappa K.; Nowalk, Mary Patricia; Sax, Theresa M.; Suyama, Joe; Bobyock, Emily; Rinaldo, Charles R.; Martin, Emily T.; Monto, Arnold S.; Jackson, Michael L.; Gaglani, Manjusha J.; Flannery, Brendan; Chung, Jessie R.; Zimmerman, Richard K. (2020). "Influenza vaccine effectiveness among outpatients in the US Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network by study site 2011‐2016." Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 14(4): 380-390.
dc.identifier.issn1750-2640
dc.identifier.issn1750-2659
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/155981
dc.description.abstractBackgroundInfluenza vaccination is recommended for all US residents aged ≥6 months. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) varies by age, circulating influenza strains, and the presence of high‐risk medical conditions. We examined site‐specific VE in the US Influenza VE Network, which evaluates annual influenza VE at ambulatory clinics in geographically diverse sites.MethodsAnalyses were conducted on 27 180 outpatients ≥6 months old presenting with an acute respiratory infection (ARI) with cough of ≤7‐day duration during the 2011‐2016 influenza seasons. A test‐negative design was used with vaccination status defined as receipt of ≥1 dose of any influenza vaccine according to medical records, registries, and/or self‐report. Influenza infection was determined by reverse‐transcription polymerase chain reaction. VE estimates were calculated using odds ratios from multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, time from illness onset to enrollment, high‐risk conditions, calendar time, and vaccination status‐site interaction.ResultsFor all sites combined, VE was statistically significant every season against all influenza and against the predominant circulating strains (VE = 19%‐50%) Few differences among four sites in the US Flu VE Network were evident in five seasons. However, in 2015‐16, overall VE in one site was 24% (95% CI = −4%‐44%), while VE in two other sites was significantly higher (61%, 95% CI = 49%‐71%; P = .002, and 53%, 95% CI = 33,67; P = .034).ConclusionWith few exceptions, site‐specific VE estimates aligned with each other and overall VE estimates. Observed VE may reflect inherent differences in community characteristics of the sites and highlights the importance of diverse settings for studying influenza vaccine effectiveness.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.othervaccine effectiveness
dc.subject.otherinfluenza vaccine
dc.subject.otherinfluenza
dc.titleInfluenza vaccine effectiveness among outpatients in the US Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network by study site 2011‐2016
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMicrobiology and Immunology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/155981/1/irv12741_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/155981/2/irv12741.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/irv.12741
dc.identifier.sourceInfluenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention and control of influenza with vaccines: interim recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013; 62 ( 18 ): 356.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. Disease burden of Influenza. https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/index.html. Accessed December 12, 2019.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePutri WC, Muscatello DJ, Stockwell MS, Newall AT. Economic burden of seasonal influenza in the United States. Vaccine. 2018; 36 ( 27 ): 3960 ‐ 3966.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. Vaccine effectiveness—how well do the flu vaccines work? https://www.cdc.gov/flu/vaccines‐work/vaccineeffect.htm. Accessed December 12, 2019.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC seasonal flu vaccine effectiveness studies. https://www.cdc.gov/flu/vaccines‐work/effectiveness‐studies.htm. Accessed December 12, 2019.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJackson ML, Nelson JC. The test‐negative design for estimating influenza vaccine effectiveness. Vaccine. 2013; 31 ( 17 ): 2165 ‐ 2168.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBelongia EA, Simpson MD, King JP, et al. Variable influenza vaccine effectiveness by subtype: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of test‐negative design studies. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016; 16 ( 8 ): 942 ‐ 951.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSkowronski DM, Chambers C, De Serres G, et al. Vaccine effectiveness against lineage‐matched and‐mismatched influenza B viruses across 8 seasons in Canada, 2010–2011 to 2017–2018. Clin Infect Dis. 2019; 68 ( 10 ): 1754 ‐ 1757.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSkowronski DM, Chambers C, Sabaiduc S, et al. Beyond antigenic match: possible agent‐host and immuno‐epidemiological influences on influenza vaccine effectiveness during the 2015–2016 season in Canada. J Infect Dis. 2017; 216 ( 12 ): 1487 ‐ 1500.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDarvishian M, Dijkstra F, van Doorn E, et al. Influenza vaccine effectiveness in the Netherlands from 2003/2004 through 2013/2014: the importance of circulating influenza virus types and subtypes. PLoS ONE. 2017; 12 ( 1 ):e0169528.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDePasse JV, Nowalk MP, Smith KJ, et al. Does cost‐effectiveness of influenza vaccine choice vary across the US? An agent‐based modeling study. Vaccine. 2017; 35 ( 32 ): 3974 ‐ 3981.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOhmit SE, Thompson MG, Petrie JG, et al. Influenza vaccine effectiveness in the 2011–2012 season: protection against each circulating virus and the effect of prior vaccination on estimates. Clin Infect Dis. 2014; 58 ( 3 ): 319 ‐ 327.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcLean HQ, Thompson MG, Sundaram ME, et al. Influenza vaccine effectiveness in the United States during 2012–2013: variable protection by age and virus type. J Infect Dis. 2015; 211 ( 10 ): 1529 ‐ 1540.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGaglani M, Pruszynski J, Murthy K, et al. Influenza vaccine effectiveness against 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus differed by vaccine type during 2013–2014 in the United States. J Infect Dis. 2016; 213 ( 10 ): 1546 ‐ 1556.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZimmerman RK, Nowalk MP, Chung J, et al. 2014–2015 influenza vaccine effectiveness in the United States by vaccine type. Clin Infect Dis. 2016; 63 ( 12 ): 1564 ‐ 1573.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFlannery B, Zimmerman RK, Gubareva LV, et al. Enhanced genetic characterization of influenza A (H3N2) viruses and vaccine effectiveness by genetic group, 2014–2015. J Infect Dis. 2016; 214 ( 7 ): 1010 ‐ 1019.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJackson ML, Chung JR, Jackson LA, et al. Influenza vaccine effectiveness in the United States—2015/16 Season. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377 ( 6 ): 534 ‐ 543.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrohskopf LA, Sokolow LZ, Olsen SJ, Bresee JS, Broder KR, Karron RA. Prevention and control of influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, United States, 2015–16 influenza season. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015; 64 ( 30 ): 818 ‐ 825.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention and control of influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011; 60 ( 33 ): 1128 ‐ 1132.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention and control of influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)–United States, 2012–13 influenza season. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012; 61 ( 32 ): 613 ‐ 618.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrohskopf LA, Olsen SJ, Sokolow LZ, et al. Prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) – United States, 2014–15 influenza season. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014; 63 ( 32 ): 691 ‐ 697.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHiggins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis. Stat Med. 2002; 21 ( 11 ): 1539 ‐ 1558.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGentile A, Paget J, Bellei N, et al. Influenza in Latin America: a report from the global influenza initiative (GII). Vaccine. 2019; 37 ( 20 ): 2670 ‐ 2678.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorris SE, De Blasio BF, Viboud C, Wesolowski A, Bjørnstad ON, Grenfell BT. Analysis of multi‐level spatial data reveals strong synchrony in seasonal influenza epidemics across Norway, Sweden, and Denmark. PLoS ONE. 2018; 13 ( 5 ): e0197519.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOhkusa Y, Sugawara T, Takahashi K, Kamei M. Comparative study of preciseness in the regional variation of influenza in Japan among the National Official Sentinel Surveillance of Infectious Diseases and the National Database of Electronic Medical Claims. Biosci Trends. 2018; 12 ( 6 ): 636 ‐ 640.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRabaan AA, Alshaikh SA, Bazzi AM. Influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 epidemiology in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. J Infect Public Health. 2018; 11 ( 5 ): 636 ‐ 639.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSegaloff H, Melidou A, Adlhoch C, et al. Co‐circulation of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and influenza A(H3N2) viruses, World Health Organization (WHO) European Region, October 2018 to February 2019. Euro Surveill. 2019; 24 ( 9 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarr IG, Donis RO, Katz JM, et al. Cell culture‐derived influenza vaccines in the severe 2017–2018 epidemic season: a step towards improved influenza vaccine effectiveness. NPJ Vaccines. 2018; 3 ( 1 ): 1 ‐ 5.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrohskopf LA, Sokolow LZ, Fry AM, Walter EB, Jernigan DB. Update: ACIP recommendations for the use of quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV4)—United States, 2018–19 influenza season. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018; 67 ( 22 ): 643.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.