Making Sense of Techno-Economic Assessment & Life Cycle Assessment Studies for CO2 Utilization: A guide on how to commission, understand, and derive decisions from TEA and LCA studies
dc.contributor.author | Cremonese, Lorenzo | |
dc.contributor.author | Olfe-Kräutlein, Barbara | |
dc.contributor.author | Strunge, Till | |
dc.contributor.author | Naims, Henriette | |
dc.contributor.author | Zimmermann, Arno | |
dc.contributor.author | Langhorst, Tim | |
dc.contributor.author | Müller, Leonard | |
dc.contributor.author | McCord, Stephen | |
dc.contributor.author | Sick, Volker | |
dc.contributor.author | Saccani, Sira | |
dc.contributor.author | Jahilo, Sander | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-15T13:43:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-15T13:43:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-04-30 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/156039 | |
dc.description.abstract | This report provides guidance to decision makers in all types of public and private organizations involved in the planning and development of CCU. It is prepared within the scope of the CO2nsistent project funded by the Global CO2 Initiative and EIT Climate-KIC, and is based on the published TEA and LCA Guidelines v.1. This report provides user-centered guidance on how to commission and understand TEA and LCA studies for CCU, and how to determine whether existing studies are eligible to be used in a decision making process. Another primary goal of this report is to ensure that disciplinary expertise is effectively taken up by decision makers and all potential audiences. The remainder of this document is structured in two parts. Part A introduces the reader to the concept of TEA and LCA studies: What types of input can such assessments provide for decision making? What are the limitations of their explanatory power? This part focuses on the goal and scope definition for such studies, and on other aspects that are particularly relevant for decision making. The document presents how the decision maker (or commissioner) and the assessment practitioner can jointly set the various assessment phases. These terms are explained in the boxes below. The approach and main components of TEA and LCA studies are described, with the specific goal of making the most sensitive disciplinary concepts clear and comprehensible to all audiences. Part B consists of practical tools to guide actors interested in commissioning TEA and LCA studies, and to support decision makers when evaluating and assessing TEA and LCA studies submitted by third parties. A series of consecutive steps, displayed as decision trees, provide support for checking the completeness of key aspects and requirements of TEA and LCA studies. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Global CO2 Initiative | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | EIT Climate-KIC | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Global CO2 Initiative | en_US |
dc.subject | CO2 utilization | en_US |
dc.subject | carbon capture and utilization | en_US |
dc.subject | decision making | en_US |
dc.subject | life cycle assessment | en_US |
dc.subject | techno-economic assessment | en_US |
dc.subject | LCA | en_US |
dc.subject | TEA | en_US |
dc.subject | LCA interpretation | en_US |
dc.title | Making Sense of Techno-Economic Assessment & Life Cycle Assessment Studies for CO2 Utilization: A guide on how to commission, understand, and derive decisions from TEA and LCA studies | en_US |
dc.type | Technical Report | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Mechanical Engineering | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | The Global CO2 Initiative | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Technische Universität Berlin | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | RWTH Aachen | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | RWTH Aachen | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | University of Sheffield, UK | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | EIT Climate-KIC | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | EIT Climate-KIC | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/156039/3/Making Sense of TEA&LCA.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3998/2027.42/156039 | |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of Making Sense of TEA&LCA.pdf : Report document | |
dc.owningcollname | Global CO2 Initiative |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.