View Item 

Show simple item record

Making the case for pass‐fail grading in dental education
dc.contributor.authorRamaswamy, Vidya
dc.contributor.authorVeremis, Brandon
dc.contributor.authorNalliah, Romesh P.
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-10T20:54:06Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHS
dc.date.available2020-08-10T20:54:06Z
dc.date.issued2020-08
dc.identifier.citationRamaswamy, Vidya; Veremis, Brandon; Nalliah, Romesh P. (2020). "Making the case for pass‐fail grading in dental education." European Journal of Dental Education 24(3): 601-604.
dc.identifier.issn1396-5883
dc.identifier.issn1600-0579
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/156171
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.titleMaking the case for pass‐fail grading in dental education
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/156171/2/eje12520.pdfen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/156171/1/eje12520_am.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/eje.12520
dc.identifier.sourceEuropean Journal of Dental Education
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990; 65 ( 9 Suppl ): S63 ‐ S67.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Shanafelt TD. Medical student distress: causes, consequences, and proposed solutions. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005; 80 ( 12 ): 1613 ‐ 1622.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaden NK, Andrieu SC, Chadwick DG, et al. The dental education environment. J Dent Educ. 2006; 70 ( 12 ): 1265 ‐ 1270.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarenberg J, Dutke S. Metacognitive monitoring in university classes: anticipating a graded vs. a pass‐fail test affects monitoring accuracy. Metacogn Learn. 2013; 8 ( 2 ): 121 ‐ 143.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKohn A. The case against grades. Educ Leader. 2011; 69 ( 3 ): 28 ‐ 33.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilkinson T. Pass/fail grading: not everything that counts can be counted. Med Educ. 2011; 45 ( 9 ): 860 ‐ 862.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrsini C, Evans P, Jerez O. How to encourage intrinsic motivation in the clinical teaching environment? A systematic review from the self‐determination theory. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2015; 12: 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrsini C, Evans P, Binnie V, Ledezma P, Fuentes F. Encouraging intrinsic motivation in the clinical setting: teachers’ perspectives from the self‐determination theory. Eur J Dent Educ. 2016; 20 ( 2 ): 102 ‐ 111.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDawson L, Fox K. Can assessment be a barrier to successful professional development? Phys Ther Rev. 2018; 23 ( 1 ): 11 ‐ 16.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRamani S, Leinster S. AMEE Guide no. 34: teaching in the clinical environment. Med Teach. 2008; 30 ( 4 ): 347 ‐ 364.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGovaerts M, van der Vleuten CP. Validity in work‐based assessment: expanding our horizons. Med Educ. 2013; 47 ( 12 ): 1164 ‐ 1174.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTekian A, Norcini J. Overcome the 60% passing score and improve the quality of assessment. GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung. 2015; 32 ( 4 ): Doc43‐Doc43.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurdoch‐Kinch CA. It’s time to reimagine the “new dental graduate”. J Dent Educ. 2018; 82 ( 11 ): 1123.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMajewski RF, da Fonseca MA, Devries ES, Hu JC, Murdoch‐Kinch CA. Factors influencing pediatric dental program directors’ selection of residents and demographics of current directors. J Dent Educ. 2009; 73 ( 3 ): 338 ‐ 344.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFagin AP, Howell TH, Da Silva J, Park SE. The impact on dental students of changes to the national board dental examination grading system. J Dent Educ. 2014; 78 ( 6 ): 813 ‐ 822.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFagin AP, Howell TH, Park SE. Oral presentation at ADEA Annual Session. March 2014.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValachovic RW. Making the grade in a pass/fail environment: what it means for students. https://adeachartingprogress.wordpress.com/2014/12/15/making‐the‐grade‐in‐a‐passfail‐environment‐what‐it‐means‐for‐students/.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMark Zmiyiwsky NA, Yoon T, Zeller K, Lamichhane P. Individual preferences on grading systems in dental schools. On J Dent Oral Health. 2018; 1 ( 2 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRyder MI, Sargent P, Perry D. Evolution and revolution: the curriculum reform process at UCSF. J Dent Educ. 2008; 72 ( 12 ): 1516 ‐ 1530.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDonaldson JH, Gray M. Systematic review of grading practice: is there evidence of grade inflation? Nurse Educ Pract. 2012; 12 ( 2 ): 101 ‐ 114.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFox K. ’Climate of fear’ in new graduates: the perfect storm? Br Dent J. 2019; 227 ( 5 ): 343 ‐ 346.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeeb GR, Braun S, Carrico C, et al. Burnout, depression and suicidal ideation in dental and dental hygiene students. Eur J Dent Educ. 2018; 22 ( 1 ): e70 ‐ e74.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceErsan N, Dolekoglu S, Fisekcioglu E, Ilguy M, Oktay I. Perceived sources and levels of stress, general self‐efficacy and coping strategies in preclinical dental students. Psychol Health Med. 2018; 23 ( 5 ): 567 ‐ 577.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBasudan S, Binanzan N, Alhassan A. Depression, anxiety and stress in dental students. Int J Med Educ. 2017; 8: 179 ‐ 186.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndre A, Pierre GC, McAndrew M. Quality of life among dental students: a survey study. J Dent Educ. 2017; 81 ( 10 ): 1164 ‐ 1170.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNaidu RS, Adams JS, Simeon D, Persad S. Sources of stress and psychological disturbance among dental students in the West Indies. J Dent Educ. 2002; 66 ( 9 ): 1021 ‐ 1030.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHenning K, Ey S, Shaw D. Perfectionism, the imposter phenomenon and psychological adjustment in medical, dental, nursing and pharmacy students. Med Educ. 1998; 32 ( 5 ): 456 ‐ 464.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReed DA, Shanafelt TD, Satele DW, et al. Relationship of pass/fail grading and curriculum structure with well‐being among preclinical medical students: a multi‐institutional study. Acad Med. 2011; 86 ( 11 ): 1367 ‐ 1373.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAli M, Asim H, Edhi AI, et al. Does academic assessment system type affect levels of academic stress in medical students? A cross‐sectional study from Pakistan. Med Educ Online. 2015; 20: 27706.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBloodgood RA, Short JG, Jackson JM, Martindale JR. A change to pass/fail grading in the first two years at one medical school results in improved psychological well‐being. Acad Med. 2009; 84 ( 5 ): 655 ‐ 662.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobins LS, Fantone JC, Oh MS, et al. The effect of pass/fail grading and weekly quizzes on first‐year students’ performances and satisfaction. Acad Med. 1995; 70 ( 4 ): 327 ‐ 329.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRohe DE, Barrier PA, Clark MM, et al. The benefits of pass‐fail grading on stress, mood, and group cohesion in medical students. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006; 81 ( 11 ): 1443 ‐ 1448.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhite CB, Fantone JC. Pass‐fail grading: laying the foundation for self‐regulated learning. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010; 15 ( 4 ): 469 ‐ 477.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDivaris K, Barlow PJ, Chendea SA, et al. The academic environment: the students’ perspective. Eur J Dent Educ. 2008; 12 ( Suppl 1 ): 120 ‐ 130.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRyan RM, Deci EL. Self‐determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well‐being. Am Psychol. 2000; 55 ( 1 ): 68 ‐ 78.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurphy RJ, Gray SA, Sterling G, Reeves K, DuCette J. A comparative study of professional student stress. J Dent Educ. 2009; 73 ( 3 ): 328 ‐ 337.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
eje12520_am.pdf
Size:
267.0KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
eje12520.pdf
Size:
292.9KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.