View Item 

Show simple item record

Incorporating patient preferences into cancer care decisions: Challenges and opportunities
dc.contributor.authorVeenstra, Christine M.
dc.contributor.authorHawley, Sarah T.
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-10T20:54:10Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHS
dc.date.available2020-08-10T20:54:10Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-01
dc.identifier.citationVeenstra, Christine M.; Hawley, Sarah T. (2020). "Incorporating patient preferences into cancer care decisions: Challenges and opportunities." Cancer 126(15): 3393-3396.
dc.identifier.issn0008-543X
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/156174
dc.publisherNational Academies Press
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherpreferences
dc.subject.otherquality of life
dc.subject.otherpatient
dc.subject.otheroncology
dc.subject.otherclinician
dc.titleIncorporating patient preferences into cancer care decisions: Challenges and opportunities
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/156174/2/cncr32959_am.pdfen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/156174/1/cncr32959.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncr.32959
dc.identifier.sourceCancer
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams CP, Miller‐Sonet E, Nipp RD, Kamal AH, Love S, Rocque GB. Importance of quality‐of‐life priorities and preferences surrounding treatment decision making in patients with cancer and oncology clinicians. Cancer. 2020; 000: 000 ‐ 000. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32961
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee CN, Dominik R, Levin CA, et al. Development of instruments to measure the quality of breast cancer treatment decisions. Health Expect. 2010; 13: 258 ‐ 272.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarrison M, Milbers K, Hudson M, Bansback N. Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments. BMJ Open. 2017; 7: e014719.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTomsik PE, Witt AM, Raddock ML, et al. How well do physician and patient visit priorities align? J Fam Pract. 2014; 63: E8 ‐ E13.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJanz NK, Wren PA, Copeland LA, Lowery JC, Goldfarb SL, Wilkins EG. Patient‐physician concordance: preferences, perceptions, and factors influencing the breast cancer surgical decision. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22: 3091 ‐ 3098.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHawley ST, Morris AM. Cultural challenges to engaging patients in shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2017; 100: 18 ‐ 24.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcAlpine K, Lewis KB, Trevena LJ, Stacey D. What is the effectiveness of patient decision aids for cancer‐related decisions? A systematic review subanalysis. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018; 2: 1 ‐ 13. doi: 10.1200/CCI.17.00148
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDay FC, Pourhomayoun M, Keeves D, et al. Feasibility study of an EHR‐integrated mobile shared decision making application. Int J Med Inform. 2019; 124: 24 ‐ 30.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBraun IM, Wright A, Peteet J, et al. Medical oncologists’ beliefs, practices, and knowledge regarding marijuana used therapeutically: a nationally representative survey study. J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36: 1957 ‐ 1962.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceResnicow K, Patel MR, McLeod MC, Katz SJ, Jagsi R. Physician attitudes about cost consciousness for breast cancer treatment: differences by cancer sub‐specialty. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019; 173: 31 ‐ 36.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDillman D, Smyth J, Christian L. Internet, Mail, and Mixed‐Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 3 rd ed. John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVeenstra CM, Wallner LP, Abrahamse PH, Janz NK, Katz SJ, Hawley ST. Understanding the engagement of key decision support persons in patient decision making around breast cancer treatment. Cancer. 2019; 125: 1709 ‐ 1716.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStacey D, Suwalska V, Boland L, Lewis KB, Presseau J, Thomson R. Are patient decision aids used in clinical practice after rigorous evaluation? A survey of trial authors. Med Decis Making. 2019; 39: 805 ‐ 815.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorrow M, Jagsi R, McLeod MC, Shumway D, Katz SJ. Surgeon attitudes toward the omission of axillary dissection in early breast Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2018; 4: 1511 ‐ 1516.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWarsame R, Kennedy CC, Kumbamu A, et al. Conversations about financial issues in routine oncology practices: a multicenter study. J Oncol Pract. 2019; 15: e690 ‐ e703.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJagsi R, Ward KC, Abrahamse PH, et al. Unmet need for clinician engagement regarding financial toxicity after diagnosis of breast cancer. Cancer. 2018; 124: 3668 ‐ 3676.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRusso S, Jongerius C, Faccio F, et al. Understanding patients’ preferences: a systematic review of psychological instruments used in patients’ preference and decision Studies. Value Health. 2019; 22: 491 ‐ 501.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInstitute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. National Academies Press; 2001.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
cncr32959.pdf
Size:
83.43KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
cncr32959_am.pdf
Size:
159.4KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.