View Item 

Show simple item record

Three- dimensional assessment of craniofacial asymmetry in children with transverse maxillary deficiency after rapid maxillary expansion: A prospective study
dc.contributor.authorEvangelista, Karine
dc.contributor.authorFerrari-Piloni, Carolina
dc.contributor.authorBarros, Leandro Almeida Nascimento
dc.contributor.authorAvelino, Melissa Ameloti Gomes
dc.contributor.authorHelena Soares Cevidanes, Lucia
dc.contributor.authorRuellas, Antonio Carlos de Oliveira
dc.contributor.authorValladares‐neto, José
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Maria Alves Garcia
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-10T20:54:43Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHS
dc.date.available2020-08-10T20:54:43Z
dc.date.issued2020-08
dc.identifier.citationEvangelista, Karine; Ferrari-Piloni, Carolina; Barros, Leandro Almeida Nascimento; Avelino, Melissa Ameloti Gomes; Helena Soares Cevidanes, Lucia; Ruellas, Antonio Carlos de Oliveira; Valladares‐neto, José ; Silva, Maria Alves Garcia (2020). "Three- dimensional assessment of craniofacial asymmetry in children with transverse maxillary deficiency after rapid maxillary expansion: A prospective study." Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research 23(3): 300-312.
dc.identifier.issn1601-6335
dc.identifier.issn1601-6343
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/156195
dc.description.abstractObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate craniofacial asymmetry in children with transverse maxillary deficiency, with or without functional unilateral posterior crossbite (UPC), before and after rapid maxillary expansion (RME).Setting and sample populationA sample of 51 children with cone beam computed tomography scans obtained before RME (T1) and a year after RME (T2).Material and methodsThis prospective study consisted of 2 groups: 25 children with functional UPC (6.77 ± 1.5 years) and 26 children without UPC (7.41 ± 1.31 years). Linear and angular measurements were obtained from zygomatic, maxilla, glenoid fossa and mandible, using original and mirrored 3D overlapped models. All right and left side comparisons in both groups and intergroups asymmetries were compared using MANOVA and t test for independent samples, respectively, statistically significant at P < .05.ResultsThe UPC group showed no side differences, but mandibular horizontal rotation at T1, and this asymmetry was improved in T2. The non- UPC group showed at baseline significant lateral asymmetry in orbitale, position of palatine foramen, respectively, in average 2.95 mm and 1.16 mm, and 0.49 mm of average asymmetry in condylar height. The glenoid fossa was symmetric in both groups at T1 and T2.ConclusionsChildren with transverse maxillary deficiency showed slight morphological asymmetry, located in the mandible position in cases of UPC, and in the orbital and maxillary regions in cases without UPC. One year after RME, patients improved their craniofacial asymmetry, with significant changes in the mandible and correction of the mandibular rotation in patients who presented UPC.
dc.publisherMosby
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.othercraniofacial abnormalities
dc.subject.othercone beam computed tomography
dc.subject.othercrossbite
dc.subject.otherfacial asymmetry
dc.subject.othermaxillary expansion
dc.titleThree- dimensional assessment of craniofacial asymmetry in children with transverse maxillary deficiency after rapid maxillary expansion: A prospective study
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/156195/2/ocr12370_am.pdfen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/156195/1/ocr12370.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ocr.12370
dc.identifier.sourceOrthodontics & Craniofacial Research
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThiesen G, Gribel BF, Kim KB, Pereira KCR, Freitas MPM. Prevalence and associated factors of mandibular asymmetry in an adult population. J Craniofac Surg. 2017; 28: e199 - 203.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSonessen L, Bakke M, Solow B. Bite force in pre- orthodontic children with unilateral crossbite. Eur J Orthod. 2001; 23: 741 - 749.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaspero C, Giannini L, Galbiati G, Kairyte L, Farronato G. Neuromuscular evaluation in young patients with unilateral posterior crossbite before and after rapid maxillary expansion. Stomatologija. 2015; 17: 84 - 88.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBen- Bassat Y, Yaffe A, Brin I, Freeman J, Ehrlich Y. Functional and morphological- occlusal aspects in children treated for unilateral posterior cross- bite. Eur J Orthod. 1993; 15: 57 - 63.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLippold C, Hoppe G, Moiseenko T, Ehmer U, Danesh G. Analysis of condylar differences in functional unilateral crossbite during early treatment- a randomized clinical study. J Orofac Orthop. 2008; 69: 283 - 296.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKilic N, Kiki A, Oktay H. Condylar asymmetry in unilateral crossbite patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133: 382 - 387.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVeli I, Uysal T, Ozer T, Ucar FI, Eruz M. Mandibular asymmetry in unilateral and bilateral crossbite patients using cone- beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2011; 81: 966 - 974.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeonardi R, Caltabiano M, Cavallini C, et al. Condyle fossa relationship associated with functional posterior crossbite, before and after rapid maxillary expansion. Angle Orthod. 2012; 82: 1040 - 1046.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIodice G, Danzi G, Cimino R, Paduano S, Michelotti A. Association between posterior crossbite, skeletal, and muscle asymmetry: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2016; 38 ( 6 ): 638 - 651.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTalapaneni AK, Nuvvula S. The association between posterior unilateral crossbite and craniomandibular asymmetry: a systematic review. J Orthod. 2012; 39 ( 4 ): 279 - 291.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKanomi R, Deguchi T, Kakuno E, Takano- Yamamoto T, Roberts WE. CBCT of skeletal changes following rapid maxillary expansion to increase arch- length with a development- dependent bonded or banded appliance. Angle Orthod. 2013; 83: 851 - 857.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrimozic J, Ovsenik M, Richmond S, Kou CH, Zhurov A. Early crossbite correction: a three- dimensional evaluation. Eur J Orthod. 2009; 31: 352 - 356.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSicurezza E, Palazzo G, Leonardi R. Three- dimensional computerized tomographic orbital volume and aperture width evaluation: a study in patients treated with rapid maxillary expansion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol and Endod. 2011; 111: 503 - 507.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeonardi R, Sicurezza E, Cutrera A, Barbato E. Early post- treatment changes of circumaxillary sutures in young patients treated with rapid maxillary expansion. Angle Orthod. 2011; 81: 36 - 41.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCevidanes LH, Alhadidi A, Paniagua B, et al. Three- dimensional quantification of mandibular asymmetry through cone- beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011; 111: 757 - 770.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlHadidi A, Cevidanes LH, Mol A, Ludlow J, Styner M. Comparison of two methods for quantitative assessment of mandibular asymmetry using cone beam computed tomography image volumes. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011; 40: 351 - 357.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKusayama M, Motohashi N, Kuroda T. Relationship between transverse dental anomalies and skeletal asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 123: 329 - 337.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUysal T, Memili B, Usumez S, Sari Z. Dental and alveolar arch widths in normal occlusion, class II division 1 and class II division 2. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75: 941 - 947.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, et al. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: Recommendations of the international RDC/TMD consortium network* and orofacial pain special interest group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014; 28: 6 - 27.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRuellas AC, Tonello C, Gomes LR, et al. Common 3- dimensional coordinate system for assessment of directional changes. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2016; 149: 645 - 656.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRuellas AC, Huanca Ghislanzoni LT, Gomes MR, et al. Comparison and reproducibility of 2 regions of reference for maxillary regional registration with cone- beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthod. 2016; 149: 533 - 542.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988: 567.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShokri A, Miresmaeili A, Farhadian N, Falah- Kooshki S, Amini P, Mollaie N. Effect of changing the head position on accuracy of transverse measurements of the maxillofacial region made on cone beam computed tomography and conventional posterior- anterior cephalograms. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017; 46: 20160180.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcNamara JA Jr, Lione R, Franchi L, et al. The role of rapid maxillary expansion in the promotion of oral and general health. Prog Orthod. 2015; 16: 33.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoreira RS, Sgrott EA, Stuker H, Alonso LG, Smith RL. Palatal asymmetry during development: an anatomical study. Clin Anat. 2008; 21: 398 - 404.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRossi M, Ribeiro E, Smith R. Craniofacial asymmetry in development: an anatomical study. Angle Orthod. 2003; 74: 381 - 385.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Clinical recommendations regarding use of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics. Position statement by the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2013; 116: 238 - 257.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEuropean Commission. Radiation protection: Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology (evidence- based guidelines). 2012; 172: 154. http://www.sedentexct.eu/files/radiation_protection_172.pdf Accessed September 24, 2019.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOenning AC, Jacobs R, Pauwels R, Straits A, Hedesiu M, Salmon B. DIMITRA Research Group. Cone- beam CT in paediatric dentistry: DIMITRA peroject position statement. Pediatr Radiol. 2018; 48: 308 - 316.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceProffit WR, Fields HW Jr. Contemporary orthodontics, 5th edn. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2012: 768.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMelsen B, Stensgaard K, Pedersen J. Sucking habits and their influence on swallowing pattern and prevalence of malocclusion. Europ J Orthod. 1979; 1: 271 - 280.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdenoids L- A. Their effect on mode of breathing and nasal airflow and their relationship to characteristics of the facial skeleton and the dentition. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1970; 265: 1 - 132.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThilander B, Lennartsoon B. A study of children with unilateral crossbite, treated and untreated in deciduous dentition. J Orofac Orthop. 2002; 63: 371 - 383.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndrade AS, Gameiro GH, Derossi M, Gavião MB. Posterior crossbite and functional changes.A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2009; 79: 380 - 386.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePinto AS, Buschang PH, Throckmorton GS, Chen P. Morphological and positional asymmetries of young children with functional unilateral posterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001; 120: 513 - 520.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKecik D, Kocadereli I, Saatci I. Evaluation of the treatment changes of functional posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 131: 202 - 215.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIshizaki K, Suzuki K, Mito T, Tanaka EM, Sato S. Morphologic, functional and occlusal characterization of mandibular lateral displacement malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137: 454.e1 - 454.e9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerro F, Spinella P, Lama N. Transverse maxillary arch form and mandibular asymmetry in patients with posterior unilateral crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 140: 828 - 838.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ocr12370.pdf
Size:
1.386MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
ocr12370_am.pdf
Size:
280.4KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.