Nurse Anesthetists' Perceptions and Use of Ultrasound for Epidural and Spinal Needle Placement in Obese Parturients
dc.contributor.author | Loebig, William Francis | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Stump, Lawrence | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-18T14:03:17Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-18T14:03:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-08-17 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/156390 | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: The use of ultrasound scout scans and real-time ultrasound scanning for epidural/spinal needle placement is possible, but not prevalent in obstetric anesthesia practice. Ultrasound use in the obese parturient with impalpable landmarks can facilitate epidural/spinal needle placement. It is estimated that 50% of parturients are obese and eight percent of those are considered morbidly obese as defined by a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2.6 A survey of Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) and Student Registered Nurse Anesthetists (SRNAs) was utilized to determine their knowledge of ultrasound for epidural/ spinal needle placement, the availability of ultrasound equipment, and barriers to ultrasound use in obstetric anesthesia practice. Previous studies have not included CRNAs. Methods: An online survey was distributed to 1,882 practicing CRNAs and SRNAs to determine their knowledge, access, and perceptions of ultrasound used for epidural and spinal needle placement in parturients with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2. Results: Of the109 respondents, 85% were involved in obstetric anesthesia services, and 76% were regularly involved in the care of parturients with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2. 57% of respondents had used ultrasound for a scout scan, and 29% used ultrasound in real-time needle placement. There was 100% agreement that ultrasound was helpful in needle placement when landmarks were indistinguishable. Barriers included a lack of knowledge, equipment, and privileges. Conclusion: Ultrasound for epidural and spinal needle placement is known by CRNAs and SRNAs and is considered useful for needle placement in a parturient with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2. The survey data showed that CRNAs who utilized ultrasound for epidural/spinal needle placement found it useful; however, they did not find it necessary in every case despite the parturients size. Because of the low response rate, further research is necessary. Data Sources: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EBSCOhost, Google Scholar, Medscape, PubMed. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Epidural and spinal needle placement | en_US |
dc.subject | ultrasound scout scans | en_US |
dc.subject | BMI | en_US |
dc.subject | morbid obesity | en_US |
dc.subject | obese parturients | en_US |
dc.subject | Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Nursing | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Medicine | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Anesthesia | en_US |
dc.title | Nurse Anesthetists' Perceptions and Use of Ultrasound for Epidural and Spinal Needle Placement in Obese Parturients | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | Doctor of Anesthesia Practice (DAP) | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Anesthesia Practice | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan-Flint | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Welch, Gena | |
dc.identifier.uniqname | wloebig | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/156390/1/Loebig2020.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7605-0333 | en_US |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of Loebig2020.pdf : thesis | |
dc.identifier.name-orcid | Loebig, William; 0000-0002-7605-0333 | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.