Show simple item record

East Anglia 1645-1660: Provincial Life and Politics During the Great Interregnum.

dc.contributor.authorButterfield, Robert Ian
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-09T00:17:48Z
dc.date.available2020-09-09T00:17:48Z
dc.date.issued1981
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/158598
dc.description.abstractThe execution of Charles I and the establishment of a republican and , subsequently, a military government probably represent the most dramatic experiments in English political history prior to 1945. These experiments were not well-received in the counties of East Anglia, resulting in the steady degeneration of relations between the counties and the various governments which directed national affairs between 1645 nd 1660. This study utilizes a variety of local and central records to plot the course of that degeneration. It uses East Anglia as a case study in order to determine the degree to which the revoluntionary forces within the capital succeeded in subverting, circumventing or overcoming opposition in the local communities and in making their new political orders felt in the provinces. This thesis asserts that, because of provincial intransigence, successive Interregnum governments were unable to rely upon the semi-independent county magistracy to implement central directives in their localities. Consequently, those governments were compelled to rob the provincial bench of many of its powers and to invest them in local agents, men of their own creation who had been advanced because of their political loyalties rather than their social position. This process alienated the county magistracy and , ironically, obliged the central government to trust itself even more to its own appointed agents. Both the New Model Army and the various separatist churches played crucial roles in these developments. The threat of military intervention enabled government agents to function in the counties despite their unpopularity. The separatist religious sects which had sprung up during the war were even more unpopular than the government itself. Consequently, they were totally dependent upon Westminister for their survival. In return for protection they usually supported the government, providing it with a valuable pool of personnel and a useful organizatonal network within the counties. The political experiment ultimately failed because Cromwell was unwilling to abrogate traditional modes of political procedure for any protracted period and because the agents of the central government failed to transform their raw military power into informal social and political influence.
dc.format.extent349 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.titleEast Anglia 1645-1660: Provincial Life and Politics During the Great Interregnum.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEuropean history
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arbor
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/158598/1/8204612.pdfen_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.