The Psychoanalytic Theory of Male Homosexuality.
dc.contributor.author | Lewes, Kenneth Allen | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-09T02:02:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-09T02:02:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1985 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/160553 | |
dc.description.abstract | The psychoanalytic theory of male homosexuality is reviewed and criticized. Freud, despite certain cultural presuppositions, outlined the basic theory, emphasizing oedipal dynamics, which was confirmed and amplified by his immediate followers, who, however, stressed the connections between homosexuality and rather severe psychopathologies such as paranoia and schizophrenia. Nevertheless, this early group allowed for the possibility of outcomes of the Oedipus Complex alternative to the normative one of heterosexuality. They also maintained the importance of such consitutional factors as innate bisexuality and narcissistic object choices. In the 1930s and 1940s, the prominent interest in oral precursors of the Oedipus Complex exp and ed the analytic discourse on homosexuality, but also reinforced the notion of the intrinsic psychopathology of that condition. At about the time of World War II, psychoanalytic norms of health and normalcy became more conventional, so that the data presented by the Kinsey Report were, for the most part, rejected by analysts. After the War, the tendency of psychoanalysts to subscribe to American social norms increased, primarily among "revisionist" schools of psychoanalysis. Theoretically, such constitutional factors as narcissism and bisexuality were reformulated as defensive manoeuvres, a teleology for the Oedipus Complex in heterosexual genitality was posited, and rhetorically the character of homosexuals was vilified. This split in psychoanalysis became focused during the APA decision to delete homosexuality from the list of emotional disorders, which also began to consider such issues as the necessarily psychopathological condition of homosexual object choice and the appropriateness of curing that condition. A concluding chapter suggests that the limitations in the psychoanalytic theory of male homosexuality were due to an embourgeoisement of analytic norms, an innate gynaikophobic stance and a counter-transferential defense against homosexual trends in analysts themselves. | |
dc.format.extent | 430 p. | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.title | The Psychoanalytic Theory of Male Homosexuality. | |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | PhD | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Personality psychology | |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/160553/1/8512455.pdf | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.