Show simple item record

Differences in Scholarly Productivity for Faculty Employed in Comprehensive Colleges and Universities.

dc.contributor.authorHolbert, Betty J. Konkol
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-09T02:05:51Z
dc.date.available2020-09-09T02:05:51Z
dc.date.issued1985
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/160676
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to analyze the differences in scholarly productivity for faculty employed in comprehensive colleges and universities and determine which combination of individual characteristics best predicts productivity. The national sample consisted of 363 faculty who held doctorates in languages. The conceptual framework originated from an integration of research on faculty productivity and motivation theory. Productivity was defined as the number of articles, books, manuals, and monographs published and of grants received during the past three years. Using stepwise multiple regression, the following variables were found to best predict productivity (multiple R = .47): primary interest in research rather than in teaching, higher academic rank, greater number of publications at time of tenure review, and a higher achievement motivation score. Variables which were not found to be significant predictors of faculty productivity included: tenure status, age, gender, the presence of children, or the rating of the doctoral granting university. Using discriminant function analysis predicting cases of low producers versus high producers, highly productive faculty were found to be married, have a primary interest in research, have higher achievement motivation, and have achieved a high academic rank. The model was able to predict 59% of the non-producers and 63% of the high producers. The results of this study indicate that theories of achievement motivation are useful in predicting faculty productivity only when achievement motivation is considered in combination with other variables. The findings suggest that: (1) faculty in comprehensive schools are predominantly midcareer, tend to cluster at the higher ranks, are not mobile, and are tenured and (2) gender differences may not be as great as previously assumed, when variables such as discipline and institutional type are taken into consideration.
dc.format.extent154 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.titleDifferences in Scholarly Productivity for Faculty Employed in Comprehensive Colleges and Universities.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineHigher education
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEducation
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arbor
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/160676/1/8520919.pdfen_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.