Show simple item record

A Tagmemic Analysis of Conversation.

dc.contributor.authorOshiro, Marian Midori
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-09T02:38:40Z
dc.date.available2020-09-09T02:38:40Z
dc.date.issued1987
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/161444
dc.description.abstractThe tagmemic method of linguistic analysis as developed by Kenneth L. Pike is applied to the analysis of informal multi-party verbal interaction ('conversation'). The three part-whole hierarchies of units of tagmemic analysis--grammatical, referential, and phonological--are each discussed with reference to prior analysts' choices of units. Methodological problems of analyzing conversation are discussed and the hierarchies reevaluated and modified in response to them. Methodological questions include (1) identification of nuclei and margins, and boundary definitions of units, (2) differences between written and oral texts, and implications of the presence of hearer/respondent(s) in spontaneous verbal interactions, and (3) the nature of cohesion and the degree and kind of convergence of the three hierarchies at their upper levels. A central question is how to treat speakership in the analysis. The conclusions reached are that alternation of speakers should not be used as a feature of grammatical units; that speakership is reflected in the purpose (an element of cohesion) of the 'move', which is a unit of the referential analysis; and that the individual speaker's voice is a feature of the unit labeled the 'turn' in the phonological hierarchy of units. Although the word 'turn' is used in this dissertation as a technical term limited to a single hierarchy, the tri-hierarchical approach of tagmemic analysis is found to contribute toward an underst and ing of what is commonly referred to as a turn (an interactional component). The analysis of speech into three distinctive systems clarifies the problem of defining a turn by identifying multiple points in an interaction--hierarchical unit boundaries--at which a change of speakers may take place. All three hierarchies as constructed for conversational analysis include the Episode and History as their highest-level units. The other units of the revised grammatical hierarchy are the Morpheme, Morpheme Cluster, Word, Grammatical Phrase, Grammatical Clause, Grammatical Sentence, and Grammatical Paragraph. For the referential hierarchy, the other units are the Concept, Concept Complex, Monolog, Exchange, Interlogue, and Speech Event. For the phonological hierarchy, they are the Phoneme, Syllable, Word, Phonological Phrase, Phonological Clause, Phonological Sentence, Turn, Phonological Paragraph (projected), and Conversation.
dc.format.extent264 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.titleA Tagmemic Analysis of Conversation.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineLinguistics
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanities
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arbor
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/161444/1/8712184.pdfen_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.