Show simple item record

An agenda for the study of Public Administration in Developing Countries

dc.contributor.authorBertelli, Anthony M.
dc.contributor.authorHassan, Mai
dc.contributor.authorHonig, Dan
dc.contributor.authorRogger, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Martin J.
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-01T23:29:04Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHS
dc.date.available2020-10-01T23:29:04Z
dc.date.issued2020-10
dc.identifier.citationBertelli, Anthony M.; Hassan, Mai; Honig, Dan; Rogger, Daniel; Williams, Martin J. (2020). "An agenda for the study of Public Administration in Developing Countries." Governance 33(4): 735-748.
dc.identifier.issn0952-1895
dc.identifier.issn1468-0491
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/162699
dc.description.abstractDeveloping nations demand a different scholarly approach in the field of public administration. We advance an agenda for research that stands on four pillars. First, in the absence of easily accessible data scholars of developing world public administration must assemble it for themselves. Second, building and testing theory plays a paramount role because researchers face limited information. Third, in developing countries, multi‐national and non‐governmental organizations are often crucial and must be considered in studying public administration. Fourth, given the novelties and ambiguities researchers face, qualitative information must be integrated throughout the research process. Our article—and the articles in this volume—constitute a call for developing country research to contribute to the study of public administration writ large, informing our understanding of both developing and developed states.
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.titleAn agenda for the study of Public Administration in Developing Countries
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGovernment Information
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPolitical Science
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelGovernment Information and Law
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162699/2/gove12520_am.pdfen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162699/1/gove12520.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/gove.12520
dc.identifier.sourceGovernance
dc.identifier.citedreferencePressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. ( 1974 ). Implementation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePotter, R. A., & Shipan, C. R. ( 2019 ). Agency rulemaking in a separation of powers system. Journal of Public Policy, 39 ( 1 ), 89 – 113.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRadin, B. A., Cooper, T. L., & McCool, D. ( 1989 ). From public action to public administration: Where does it lead? Public Administration Review, 49 ( 2 ), 167 – 170.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRasul, I., & Rogger, D. ( 2018 ). Management of bureaucrats and public service delivery: Evidence from the nigerian civil service. The Economic Journal, 128 ( 608 ), 413 – 446.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRasul, I., Rogger, D., & Williams, M. J. ( 2019 ). Management, organizational performance, and task clarity: Evidence from Ghana’s civil service. Mimeo.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRiccucci, N. M., & Van Ryzin, G. G. ( 2017 ). Representative bureaucracy: A lever to enhance social equity, coproduction, and democracy. Public Administration Review, 77 ( 1 ), 21 – 30.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoberts, A. ( 2020 ). Strategies for governing. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobichau, R. W., & Lynn, L. E., Jr. ( 2009 ). The implementation of public policy: Still the missing link. Policy Studies Journal, 37 ( 1 ), 21 – 36.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchuster, C., Meyer‐Sahling, J.‐H., & Mikkelsen, K. ( 2020 ). (Un)principled principals, (un)principled agents: The differential effects of managerial civil service reforms on corruption in developing and OECD countries. Governance, 33 ( 4 ), 829 – 848.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShockley, B., Ewers, M., Nardis, Y., & Gengler, J. ( 2018 ). Exaggerating good governance: Regime type and score inflation among executive survey informants. Governance, 31 ( 4 ), 643 – 664.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSkowronek, S. ( 1982 ). Building a new American state: The expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920. New York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStockemer, D., & Sundstrom, A. ( 2019 ). Corruption and woman in cabinets: Informal barriers to recruitment in the executive. Governance, 32, 83 – 102.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThomann, E., van Engen, N., & Tummers, L. ( 2018 ). The necessity of discretion: A behavioral evaluation of bottom‐up implementation theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28 ( 4 ), 583 – 601.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThomas, J., & Grindle, M. ( 1990 ). After the decision: Implementing policy reforms in developing countries. World Development, 18 ( 8 ), 1163 – 1181.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWallace, J. ( 2016 ). Juking the stats? Authoritarian information problems in China. British Journal of Political Science, 46 ( 1 ), 11 – 29.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeaver, J. ( 2018 ). Jobs for sale: Bribery and misallocation in hiring. Unpublished working paper. Retrieved from https://www.jeff-weaver.com/research.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams, M., & Yecalo‐Tecle, L. ( 2019 ). Civil service reform and performance management in Ghana and Zambia since 1990. IGC Working Paper. Retrieved from https://www.theigc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Williams-and-Yecalo-Tecle-2019-working-paper.pdf.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson, J. Q. ( 1994 ). Reinventing public administration. PS: Political Science and Politics, 27 ( 4 ), 667 – 673.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWorld Bank. ( 2020 ). World Bank country and lending groups. Retrieved from https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYesilkagit, K., & Van Thiel, S. ( 2008 ). Political influence and bureaucratic autonomy. Public Organization Review, 8 ( 2 ), 137 – 153.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAngulo Amaya, M. C., Bertelli, A. M., & Woodhouse, E. ( 2020 ). The political cost of public‐private partnerships: Theory and evidence from Colombian infrastructure development. Governance, 33 ( 4 ), 771 – 788.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndrews, M. ( 2013 ). The limits of institutional reform in development: Changing rules for realistic solutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAng, Y. Y. ( 2017 ). Beyond weber: Conceptualizing an alternative ideal type of bureaucracy in developing contexts. Regulation and Governance, 11, 282 – 298.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAng, Y. Y. ( 2020 ). China’s gilded age: The paradox of China’s economic boom and vast corruption. New York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnsell, C. ( 2011 ). Pragmatist democracy: Evolutionary learning as public philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAshraf, N., Bandiera, O., & Lee, S. S. ( 2016 ). Do‐gooders and go‐getters: Selection and performance in public service delivery. Working Paper.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBalcells, L., & Sullivan, C. M. ( 2018 ). New findings from conflict archives: An introduction and methodological framework. Journal of Peace Research, 55, 137 – 146.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarzelay, M. ( 2019 ). Public management as a design‐oriented professional discipline. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBates, R. H. ( 1981 ). Markets and states in tropical Africa: The political bases of agricultural policies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerliner, D. ( 2017 ). Sunlight or Window Dressing? Local Government Compliance with South Africa’s Promotion of Access to Information Act. Governance, 30 ( 4 ), 641 – 661.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBertelli, A., Clouser McCann, P. J., & Travaglini, G. L. ( 2019 ). Delegation, collaborative governance, and nondistributive policy: The curious case of joint partnerships in American federalism. Journal of Politics, 81 ( 1 ), 377 – 384.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBertelli, A. M., & Lynn, L. E., Jr. ( 2006 ). Madison’s managers: Public administration and the constitution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBertelli, A. M., Mason, D. P., Connolly, J. M., & Gastwirth, D. A. ( 2015 ). Measuring agency attributes with attitudes across time: A method and examples using large‐scale federal surveys. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25 ( 2 ), 513 – 544.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBertrand, M., Burgess, R., Chawla, A., & Xu, G. ( 2020 ). The glittering prizes: Career incentives and bureaucrat performance. Review of Economic Studies, 87 ( 2 ), 626 – 665.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrinkerhoff, D. W., & Brinkerhoff, J. M. ( 2015 ). Public sector management reform in developing countries: Perspectives beyond NPM orthodoxy. Public Administration and Development, 35 ( 4 ), 222 – 237.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCapano, G. ( 2003 ). Administrative traditions and policy change: When policy paradigms matter. The case of Italian administrative reform during the 1990s. Public Administration, 81 ( 4 ), 781 – 801.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarpenter, D. P. ( 2001 ). The forging of bureaucratic autonomy: Reputations, networks, and policy innovation in executive agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarpenter, D. P., & Krause, G. A. ( 2012 ). Reputation and public administration. Public Administration Review, 72 ( 1 ), 26 – 32.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChattopadhyay, R., & Duflo, E. ( 2004 ). Women as policy makers: Evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India. Econometrica, 72 ( 5 ), 1409 – 1443.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDahlström, C., & Lapuente, V. ( 2017 ). Organizing leviathan: Politicians, bureaucrats, and the making of good government. New York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDal Bo, E., Finan, F., & Rossi, M. A. ( 2013 ). Strengthening state capabilities: The role of financial incentives in the call to public service. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1169 – 1218.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFernandez, S., Resh, W. G., Moldogaziev, T., & Oberfield, Z. W. ( 2015 ). Assessing the past and promise of the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey for public management research: A research synthesis. Public Administration Review, 75 ( 3 ), 382 – 394.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinan, F., Olken, B. A., & Pande, R. ( 2017 ). The personnel economics of the state. In A. V. Banerjee & E. Duflo (Eds.), Handbook of field experiments. Elsevier.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFukuyama, F. ( 2013 ). What is governance? Governance, 26 ( 3 ), 347 – 368.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGhani, A., & Lockhart, C. ( 2009 ). Fixing failed states: A framework for rebuilding a fractured world. New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGolden, M., & Min, B. ( 2013 ). Distributive politics around the world. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 73 – 99.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHacker, J. S., & Pierson, P. ( 2011 ). Winner‐take‐all politics: How Washington made the rich richer–and turned its back on the middle class. New York: Simon and Schuster.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHassan, M. & Omealia, T. ( 2020 ). Representative Bureaucracy, Role Congruence, and Kenya’s Gender Quota. Governance 33 ( 4 ), 809 – 827.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHelmke, G., & Levitsky, S. ( 2004 ). Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on politics, 2 ( 4 ), 725 – 740.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHonig, D. ( 2019 ). Case study design and analysis as a complementary empirical strategy to econometric analysis in the study of public agencies: Deploying mutually supportive mixed methods. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29 ( 2 ), 299 – 317.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHonig, D. ( 2020 ). Information, power, and location: World Bank staff decentralization and aid project success. Governance, 33 ( 4 ), 749 – 769.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuber, J. D., & McCarty, N. ( 2004 ). Bureaucratic capacity, delegation, and political reform. American Political Science Review, 98 ( 3 ), 481 – 494.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHyun, C., Post, A. E., & Ray, I. ( 2018 ). Frontline worker compliance with transparency reforms: Barriers posed by family and financial responsibilities. Governance, 31 ( 1 ), 65 – 83.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIngram, H., & Schneider, A. ( 1990 ). Improving implementation through framing smarter statutes. Journal of Public Policy, 10 ( 1 ), 67 – 88.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJindra, C., & Vaz, A. ( 2019 ). Good governance and multidimensional poverty: A comparative analysis of 71 countries. Governance, 32, 657 – 675.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKay, K., Rogger, D. and Sen, I. ( 2020 ). Bureaucratic Locus of Control. Governance 33 ( 4 ), 871 – 896.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKelley, J., & Simmons, B. (Eds.). ( 2020 ). The power of global performance indicatiors. New York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKipling, R. ( 1891 ). The English flag. National Observer. London: UK. Retrieved from http://www.kiplingsociety.co.uk/poems_englishflag.htm.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKumar, T., Post, A. E., & Ray, I. ( 2018 ). Flows, leaks and blockages in informational interventions: A field experimental study of Bangalore’s water sector. World Development, 106, 149 – 160.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevy, B. ( 2014 ). Working with the grain: Integrating governance and growth in development strategies. New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartin, M. B., & George, B. ( 2018 ). Equal access to the top? Representative bureaucracy and politicians’ recruitment preferences for top administrative staff. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28 ( 4 ), 535 – 550.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCubbins, M. D., Noll, R. G., & Weingast, B. R. ( 1989 ). Structure and process, politics and policy: Administrative arrangements and the political control of agencies. Virginia Law Review, 431 ‐ 482.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcDonnell, E. M. ( 2016 ). Conciliatory states: Elite ethno‐demographics and the puzzle of public goods within diverse African states. Comparative Political Studies, 49 ( 11 ), 1513 – 1549.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcDonnell, E. M. ( 2017 ). Patchwork leviathan: How pockets of bureaucratic governance flourish within institutionally diverse developing states. American Sociological Review, 82 ( 3 ), 476 – 510.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMele, V. ( 2010 ). Innovation policy in Italy (1993–2002): Understanding the invention and persistence of a public management reform. Governance, 23 ( 2 ), 251 – 276.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMele, V., & Belardinelli, P. ( 2018 ). Mixed methods in public administration research: Selecting, sequencing, and connecting. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29 ( 2 ), 334 – 347.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMerriam, C. E. ( 1940 ). Public administration and political theory. Journal of Social Philosophy, 5 ( 1 ), 293 – 308.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller, G. J., & Whitford, A. B. ( 2016 ). Above politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNabatchi, T. ( 2012 ). Putting the “public” back in public values research: Designing participation to identify and respond to values. Public Administration Review, 72 ( 5 ), 699 – 708.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO’Brien, D. Z., & Rickne, J. ( 2016 ). Gender quotas and women’s political leadership. American Political Science Review, 110 ( 1 ), 112 – 126.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOnyango, G. ( 2020 ). Legislative oversight and policy‐reforms in “unsettled” political contexts of public administration. International Journal of Public Administration, 43 ( 3 ), 213 – 228.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOpalo, K. ( 2020 ). Citizen political knowledge and accountability: Panel survey evidence on devolved government in Kenya. Governance, 33 ( 4 ), 849 – 869.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerry, J. L. ( 1996 ). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6, 5 – 22.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerry, J. L., & Vandenabeele, W. ( 2015 ). Public service motivation research: Achievements, challenges, and future directions. Public Administration Review, 75 ( 5 ), 692 – 699.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePepinsky, T. B., Pierskalla, J. H., & Sacks, A. ( 2017 ). Bureaucracy and service delivery. Annual Review of Political Science, 20, 249 ‐ 268.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeterson, D. ( 2020 ). Archive catalogues. Retrieved from https://derekrpeterson.com/archive-work/.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. ( 2017 ). Public management reform: A comparative analysis‐into the age of austerity. New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.