View Item 

Show simple item record

Towards a critical realist epistemology?
dc.contributor.authorAlbert, Katelin
dc.contributor.authorBrundage, Jonah Stuart
dc.contributor.authorSweet, Paige
dc.contributor.authorVandenberghe, Frédéric
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-01T23:29:43Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_12_MONTHS
dc.date.available2020-10-01T23:29:43Z
dc.date.issued2020-09
dc.identifier.citationAlbert, Katelin; Brundage, Jonah Stuart; Sweet, Paige; Vandenberghe, Frédéric (2020). "Towards a critical realist epistemology?." Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 50(3): 357-372.
dc.identifier.issn0021-8308
dc.identifier.issn1468-5914
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/162717
dc.description.abstractWhen critical realists consider epistemology they typically start from “epistemological relativism.” We find this position necessary, but we also find it insufficient because it lacks a critique of the highly unequal social relations among observers themselves—relations that shape the very production of knowledge. While it is indeed the case that all knowledge is fallible, it is also the case that all knowledge is positioned, with a particular standpoint. What is more, the social power relations between standpoints organize the production of truth in ways that produce systematic distortions. In this paper, we propose a critical realist social epistemology. We introduce feminist standpoint theory and postcolonial theory as our suggested interventions into critical realism and we use two case studies of existing work to highlight i) the social production of truth and the real, and ii) what is at stake for radicalizing epistemology in critical realism. In so doing, our paper emphasizes the epistemic complexities that continuously shape ontology, a commitment to subaltern voices or experiences, and a thorough interrogation of the relations between positions of knowledge production.
dc.publisherRoutledge
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherstandpoint theory
dc.subject.othercritical realism
dc.subject.otherepistemology
dc.subject.otherontology
dc.subject.otherpostcolonial theory
dc.titleTowards a critical realist epistemology?
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSociology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162717/2/jtsb12248_am.pdfen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162717/1/jtsb12248.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jtsb.12248
dc.identifier.sourceJournal for the Theory of Social Behaviour
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNaples, N., & Gurr, B. ( 2014 ). Feminist empiricism and standpoint theory: Approaches to understanding the social world. In S. N. Hesse‐Biber (Ed.), Feminist research practice (pp. 14 – 41 ). New York, NY: Sage Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFanon, F. ( 1986 ). Black skin, white masks (C.L. Markmann, Trans.). London, UK: Pluto Press. Original work published 1952.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarding, S., & Hintikka, M. B. (Eds.). ( 1983 ). Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHartsock, N. ( 1983 ). The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In S. Harding & M. Hintikka (Eds.), Discovering reality (pp. 283 – 310 ). Dordrecht, Reidel: Springer.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHasson, K. A. ( 2012 ). From bodies to lives, complainers to consumers: Measuring menstrual excess. Social Science & Medicine, 75 ( 10 ), 1729 – 1736.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHill, S. ( 2012, March 26). Storyteller’s conference. Buffalo, NY: SUNY.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHockey, N. ( 2010 ). Engaging postcolonialism: Towards a critical realist indigenist critique of an approach by Denzin and Lincoln. Journal of Critical Realism, 9 ( 3 ), 353 – 383.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLawson, T. ( 1997 ). Economics and reality. London, UK: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLongino, H. ( 2001 ). The fate of knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarlor, C. ( 2010 ). Bureaucracy, democracy and exclusion: Why Indigenous knowledge holders have a hard time being taken seriously. Qualitative Sociology, 33 ( 4 ), 513 – 531.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartin, K., & Mirraboopa, B. ( 2003 ). Ways of knowing, being and doing: A theoretical framework and methods for indigenous and indigenist research. Journal of Australian Studies, 27 ( 76 ), 203 – 214.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMohanty, C. ( 1988 ). Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Review, 30 ( 1 ), 61 – 88.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD’Souza, R. ( 2010 ). Introduction to the special issue: Postcolonialism, realism, and critical realism. Journal of Critical Realism, 9 ( 3 ), 263 – 275.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePorpora, D. ( 2015 ). Reconstructing sociology: The critical realist approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaid, E. ( 1978 ). Orientalism. New York, NY: Pantheon.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, D. E. ( 1987 ). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, L. T. ( 1999 ). Decolonizing methodologies. New York, NY: Zed books.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSantos, B. d. S. ( 2014 ). Epistemologies of the south. Justice against epistemicide. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteinmetz, G. ( 2004 ). Odious comparisons: Incommensurability, the case study, and “small N’s” in sociology. Sociological Theory, 22 ( 3 ), 371 – 400.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteinmetz, G. ( 2014 ). The sociology of empires, colonialism, and postcolonialism. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 77 – 103.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSayer, A. ( 2000 ). Realism and social science. London, UK: Sage.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSprague, J. ( 2006 ). Feminist methodologies for critical researchers: Bridging differences. Lantham, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSweet, P. L. ( 2018 ). The feminist question in realism. Sociological Theory, 36 ( 3 ), 221 – 243.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVandenberghe, F. ( 2019 ). The normative foundations of critical realism. Journal of Critical Realism, 17 ( 2 ), 319 – 336.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVandenberghe, F. ( 2020 ). After words: The spirit of evolution and envelopment. In R. Bhaskar, S. Esbjörn‐Hargens, N. Hedlund, & M. Hartwig (Eds.), Metatheory for the anthropocene: Emancipatory praxis for planetary flourishing. London, UK: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWatts, V. ( 2013 ). Indigenous place‐thought & agency amongst humans and non‐humans (First Woman and Sky Woman go on a European world tour!). Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 2 ( 1 ), 20 – 34.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArcher, M., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T., & Norrie, A. ( 1998 ). Critical realism: Essential readings. London, UK: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArcher, M., Decoteau, C., Gorski, P., Little, D., Porpora, D., Rutzou, T., … Vandenberghe, F. ( 2016 ). What is critical realism? Perspectives: A newsletter of the ASA theory section. Retrieved from http://www.asatheory.org/current-newsletter-online/what-is-critical-realism
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBhaskar, R. ( 1975 ). A realist theory of science. London, UK: Verso.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBhaskar, R. ( 1979 ). The possibility of naturalism. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBhaskar, R. ( 1993 ). Dialectic: The pulse of freedom. London, UK: Verso.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrowne, A. J., Smye, V. L., & Varcoe, C. ( 2005 ). The relevance of postcolonial theoretical perspectives to research in aboriginal health. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research Archive, 37 ( 4 ), 16 – 37.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCode, L. ( 1991 ). What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollins, H. M., & Evans, R. ( 2002 ). The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32, 235 – 296.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollins, P. H. ( 1990 ). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDanermark, B., Ekstrom, M., & Jakobsen, L. ( 2002 ). Explaining society: An introduction to critical realism in the social sciences. London, UK: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDecoteau, C. L. ( 2017 ). Learning to see otherwise. Ethnography, 18 ( 1 ), 68 – 75.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFigert, A. ( 2017 ). Women and the ownership of PMS: The structuring of a psychiatric disorder. New York, NY: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFuller, S. ( 1988 ). Social epistemology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGandhi, L. ( 1998 ). Postcolonial theory. A critical introduction. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGieryn, T. F., & Figert, A. E. ( 1986 ). Scientists protect their cognitive authority: The status degradation ceremony of sir Cyril Burt. In G. Böhme & N. Stehr (Eds.), The knowledge society (pp. 67 – 86 ). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGillman, L. ( 2016 ). Critical realist and postpositivist realist feminisms: Towards a feminist dialectical realism. Journal of Critical Realism, 15 ( 5 ), 458 – 475.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGo, J. ( 2016 ). Postcolonial thought and social theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGorski, P. ( 2013 ). What is critical realism? And why should you care? Contemporary Sociology, 42, 658 – 670.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHabermas, J. ( 2003 ). Truth and justification. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaraway, D. ( 1988 ). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14 ( 3 ), 575 – 599.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaraway, D. ( 1997 ). Modest−Witness@Second−Millennium.FemaleMan−Meets−OncoMouse: Feminism and technoscience. London, UK: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarding, S. ( 1993 ). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is ‘strong objectivity’? In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies. New York, NY: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarding, S. ( 1998 ). Is science multicultural?: Postcolonialisms, feminisms, and epistemologies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jtsb12248.pdf
Size:
512.8KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
jtsb12248_am.pdf
Size:
350.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.