Show simple item record

cIMPACT‐NOW update 7: advancing the molecular classification of ependymal tumors

dc.contributor.authorEllison, David W.
dc.contributor.authorAldape, Kenneth D.
dc.contributor.authorCapper, David
dc.contributor.authorFouladi, Maryam
dc.contributor.authorGilbert, Mark R.
dc.contributor.authorGilbertson, Richard J.
dc.contributor.authorHawkins, Cynthia
dc.contributor.authorMerchant, Thomas E.
dc.contributor.authorPajtler, Kristian
dc.contributor.authorVenneti, Sriram
dc.contributor.authorLouis, David N.
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-01T23:32:00Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_12_MONTHS
dc.date.available2020-10-01T23:32:00Z
dc.date.issued2020-09
dc.identifier.citationEllison, David W.; Aldape, Kenneth D.; Capper, David; Fouladi, Maryam; Gilbert, Mark R.; Gilbertson, Richard J.; Hawkins, Cynthia; Merchant, Thomas E.; Pajtler, Kristian; Venneti, Sriram; Louis, David N. (2020). "cIMPACT‐NOW update 7: advancing the molecular classification of ependymal tumors." Brain Pathology (5): 863-866.
dc.identifier.issn1015-6305
dc.identifier.issn1750-3639
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/162791
dc.description.abstractAdvances in our understanding of the biological basis and molecular characteristics of ependymal tumors since the latest iteration of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of CNS tumors (2016) have prompted the cIMPACT‐NOW group to recommend a new classification. Separation of ependymal tumors by anatomic site is an important principle of the new classification and was prompted by methylome profiling data to indicate that molecular groups of ependymal tumors in the posterior fossa and supratentorial and spinal compartments are distinct. Common recurrent genetic or epigenetic alterations found in tumors belonging to the main molecular groups have been used to define tumor types at intracranial sites; C11orf95 and YAP1 fusion genes for supratentorial tumors and two types of posterior fossa ependymoma defined by methylation group, PFA and PFB. A recently described type of aggressive spinal ependymoma with MYCN amplification has also been included. Myxopapillary ependymoma and subependymoma have been retained as histopathologically defined tumor types, but the classification has dropped the distinction between classic and anaplastic ependymoma. While the cIMPACT‐NOW group considered that data to inform assignment of grade to molecularly defined ependymomas are insufficiently mature, it recommends assigning WHO grade 2 to myxopapillary ependymoma and allows grade 2 or grade 3 to be assigned to ependymomas not defined by molecular status.
dc.publisherLyon
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherependymoma
dc.subject.othercIMPACT
dc.subject.otherclassification
dc.titlecIMPACT‐NOW update 7: advancing the molecular classification of ependymal tumors
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciences
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162791/2/bpa12866_am.pdfen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162791/1/bpa12866.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/bpa.12866
dc.identifier.sourceBrain Pathology
dc.identifier.citedreferencePanwalkar P, Clark J, Ramaswamy V, Hawes D, Yang F, Dunham C et al ( 2017 ) Immunohistochemical analysis of H3K27me3 demonstrates global reduction in group‐A childhood posterior fossa ependymoma and is a powerful predictor of outcome. Acta Neuropathol 134: 705 – 714.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndreiuolo F, Varlet P, Tauziede‐Espariat A, Junger ST, Dorner E, Dreschmann V et al ( 2019 ) Childhood supratentorial ependymomas with YAP1‐MAMLD1 fusion: an entity with characteristic clinical, radiological, cytogenetic and histopathological features. Brain Pathol 29: 205 – 216.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCapper D, Jones DTW, Sill M, Hovestadt V, Schrimpf D, Sturm D et al ( 2018 ) DNA methylation‐based classification of central nervous system tumours. Nature 555: 469 – 474.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCavalli FMG, Hubner JM, Sharma T, Luu B, Sill M, Zapotocky M et al ( 2018 ) Heterogeneity within the PF‐EPN‐B ependymoma subgroup. Acta Neuropathol 136: 227 – 237.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllison DW, Kocak M, Figarella‐Branger D, Felice G, Catherine G, Pietsch T et al ( 2011 ) Histopathological grading of pediatric ependymoma: reproducibility and clinical relevance in European trial cohorts. J Negat Results Biomed. 10: 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGhasemi DR, Sill M, Okonechnikov K, Korshunov A, Yip S, Schutz PW et al ( 2019 ) MYCN amplification drives an aggressive form of spinal ependymoma. Acta Neuropathol 138: 1075 – 1089.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGodfraind C, Kaczmarska JM, Kocak M, Dalton J, Wright KD, Sanford RA et al ( 2012 ) Distinct disease‐risk groups in pediatric supratentorial and posterior fossa ependymomas. Acta Neuropathol 124: 247 – 257.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKilday JP, Mitra B, Domerg C, Ward J, Andreiuolo F, Osteso‐Ibanez T et al ( 2012 ) Copy number gain of 1q25 predicts poor progression‐free survival for pediatric intracranial ependymomas and enables patient risk stratification: a prospective European clinical trial cohort analysis on behalf of the Children’s Cancer Leukaemia Group (CCLG), Societe Francaise d’Oncologie Pediatrique (SFOP), and International Society for Pediatric Oncology (SIOP). Clinical Cancer Research 18: 2001 – 2011.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKorshunov A, Witt H, Hielscher T, Benner A, Remke M, Ryzhova M et al ( 2010 ) Molecular staging of intracranial ependymoma in children and adults. J Clin Oncol 28: 3182 – 3190.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLouis DN, Perry A, Burger P, Ellison DW, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A et al ( 2014 ) International Society of Neuropathology‐Haarlem consensus guidelines for nervous system tumor classification and grading. Brain Pathol 24: 429 – 435.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLouis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Ellison DW, Figarella Branger D et al ( 2016 ) WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System. Lyon: IARC.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLouis DN, Wesseling P, Paulus W, Giannini C, Batchelor TT, Cairncross JG et al ( 2018 ) cIMPACT‐NOW update 1: not otherwise specified (NOS) and not elsewhere classified (NEC). Acta Neuropathol 135: 481 – 484.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMack SC, Witt H, Piro RM, Gu L, Zuyderduyn S, Stutz AM et al ( 2014 ) Epigenomic alterations define lethal CIMP‐positive ependymomas of infancy. Nature 506: 445 – 450.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMerchant TE, Bendel AE, Sabin ND, Burger PC, Shaw DW, Chang E et al ( 2019 ) Conformal radiation therapy for pediatric ependymoma, chemotherapy for incompletely resected ependymoma, and observation for completely resected, supratentorial ependymoma. J Clin Oncol 37: 974 – 983.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePajtler KW, Wen J, Sill M, Lin T, Orisme W, Tang B et al ( 2018 ) Molecular heterogeneity and CXorf67 alterations in posterior fossa group A (PFA) ependymomas. Acta Neuropathol 136: 211 – 226.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePajtler KW, Witt H, Sill M, Jones DT, Hovestadt V, Kratochwil F et al ( 2015 ) Molecular classification of ependymal tumors across all CNS compartments, histopathological grades, and age groups. Cancer Cell 27: 728 – 743.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParker M, Mohankumar KM, Punchihewa C, Weinlich R, Dalton JD, Li Y et al ( 2014 ) C11orf95‐RELA fusions drive oncogenic NF‐kappaB signalling in ependymoma. Nature 506: 451 – 455.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSturm D, Orr BA, Toprak UH, Hovestadt V, Jones DTW, Capper D et al ( 2016 ) New brain tumor entities emerge from molecular classification of CNS‐PNETs. Cell 164: 1060 – 1072.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwanson AA, Raghunathan A, Jenkins RB, Messing‐Junger M, Pietsch T, Clarke MJ et al ( 2019 ) Spinal cord ependymomas with MYCN amplification show aggressive clinical behavior. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 78: 791 – 797.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVera‐Bolanos E, Aldape K, Yuan Y, Wu J, Wani K, Necesito‐Reyes MJ et al ( 2015 ) Clinical course and progression‐free survival of adult intracranial and spinal ependymoma patients. Neuro Oncol 17: 440 – 447.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWani K, Armstrong TS, Vera‐Bolanos E, Raghunathan A, Ellison D, Gilbertson R et al ( 2012 ) A prognostic gene expression signature in infratentorial ependymoma. Acta Neuropathol 123: 727 – 738.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWitt H, Gramatzki D, Hentschel B, Pajtler KW, Felsberg J, Schackert G et al ( 2018 ) DNA methylation‐based classification of ependymomas in adulthood: implications for diagnosis and treatment. Neuro Oncol 20: 1616 – 1624.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWitt H, Mack SC, Ryzhova M, Bender S, Sill M, Isserlin R et al ( 2011 ) Delineation of two clinically and molecularly distinct subgroups of posterior fossa ependymoma. Cancer Cell 20: 143 – 157.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.