Political Platforms: Technology, User Affordances, and Campaign Communications
dc.contributor.author | Hiaeshutter-Rice, Daniel | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-04T23:35:48Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-04T23:35:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/163218 | |
dc.description.abstract | Political candidates communicate across a wide number of platforms during their campaigns, including television, Facebook, Twitter, debates, radio, and newspapers. However, these platforms are not the same. Each is made up of a number of different technical features and user affordances. Technical features shape the type of content that can be transmitted through each platform and user affordances describe how platforms are interpreted and used by candidates. The interaction between features and affordances suggests that content ought to vary across platforms, even when the user of those platforms is the same. I argue in this project that the interaction of features and affordances inclines platforms towards certain ideological audiences and allows for interactions between candidates. I term these the audience and channel of the platform. Audience can range from narrow to broad indicating the degree to which the audience is ideologically homogenous. Channel goes from shared to independent as an indication of how easily candidates can directly interact with their opponents. I find that broad audience platforms with independent channels are, on average, more negative than narrow audience, shared channel platforms. I also find that policy content is more present in broad audience platforms. Finally, I find that visual communications also exhibit similar patterns. Broad audience and independent channel platforms are markedly more negative and contain more policy language than narrow audience and shared channel platforms. These findings stand up with multiple test of robustness, including different dictionary specifications, word counts, and different elections. These findings suggest that audiences are being exposed to systematically different content, depending on where they get their information from. This could have meaningful and serious implications for our understanding of political knowledge, polarization, candidate evaluations, and voting. I offer the Platform Audience and Channel Theory as a tool for researchers to study current platforms and a way to understand platforms that have not yet been developed. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.subject | Political Communication | |
dc.subject | Political Campaigns | |
dc.subject | Political Information | |
dc.title | Political Platforms: Technology, User Affordances, and Campaign Communications | |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | PhD | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Communication | |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies | |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Soroka, Stuart | |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Valentino, Nicholas A | |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Van Den Bulck, Jan | |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Weeks, Brian | |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Communications | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163218/1/dhrice_1.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0003-3204-5548 | |
dc.identifier.name-orcid | Hiaeshutter-Rice, Dan; 0000-0003-3204-5548 | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.