View Item 

Show simple item record

Zooming In Versus Flying Out: Virtual Residency Interviews in the Era of COVID‐19
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Mallory G.
dc.contributor.authorHaas, Mary R. C.
dc.contributor.authorGottlieb, Michael
dc.contributor.authorHouse, Joseph B.
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Rob D.
dc.contributor.authorHopson, Laura R.
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-04T15:58:02Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_12_MONTHS
dc.date.available2020-11-04T15:58:02Z
dc.date.issued2020-10
dc.identifier.citationDavis, Mallory G.; Haas, Mary R. C.; Gottlieb, Michael; House, Joseph B.; Huang, Rob D.; Hopson, Laura R. (2020). "Zooming In Versus Flying Out: Virtual Residency Interviews in the Era of COVID‐19." AEM Education and Training 4(4): 443-446.
dc.identifier.issn2472-5390
dc.identifier.issn2472-5390
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/163370
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.titleZooming In Versus Flying Out: Virtual Residency Interviews in the Era of COVID‐19
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEmergency Medicine
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163370/2/aet210486.pdfen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163370/1/aet210486_am.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/aet2.10486
dc.identifier.sourceAEM Education and Training
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrouwel M, Jolly K, Greenfield S. Comparing Skype (video calling) and in‐person qualitative interview modes in a study of people with irritable bowel syndrome – an exploratory comparative analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol 2019; 19: 219.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDunleavy D, Overton R, Prescott J. Results of the 2016 Program Directors Survey: Current Practices in Residency Selection. Association of American Medical Colleges. 2016. Available at: https://store.aamc.org/results‐of‐the‐2016‐program‐directors‐survey.html. Accessed Apr 26, 2020
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLove JN, Howell JM, Hegarty CB, et al. Factors that influence medical student selection of an emergency medicine residency program: implications for training programs. Acad Emerg Med 2012; 19: 455 – 60.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Resident Matching Program. Results and Data: 2019 Main Residency Match. 2019. Available at: http://www.nrmp.org/main‐residency‐match‐data/. Accessed Apr 24, 2020
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNilsen K, Callaway P, Phillips JP, Walling A. How much do family medicine residency programs spend on resident recruitment? A CERA study. Fam Med 2019; 51: 405 – 12.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGardner AK, Smink DS, Scott BG, Korndorffer JR, Harrington D, Ritter EM. How much are we spending on resident selection? J Surg Educ 2018; 75: 85 – 90.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCallaway P, Melhado T, Walling A, Groskurth J. Financial and time burdens for medical students interviewing for residency. Fam Med 2017; 49: 137 – 40.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Dermark JT, Wald DA, Corker JR, Reid DG. Financial implications of the emergency medicine interview process. AEM Educ Train 2017; 1: 60 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAssociation of American Medical Colleges. Conducting Interviews During the Coronarvirus Pandemic. Med Educ. 2020. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/what‐we‐do/mission‐areas/medical‐education/conducting‐interviews‐during‐coronavirus‐pandemic. Accessed May 23, 2020
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShah SK, Sanjeev S, Betty S, Summers K, Craig T, Smith AY. Randomized evaluation of a web based interview process for urology resident selection. J Urol 2012; 187: 1380 – 4.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDaram S, Wu R, Tang S. Interview from anywhere: feasibility and utility of web‐based videoconference interviews in the gastroenterology fellowship selection process. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109: 155 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVadi MG, Malkin MR, Lenart J, Stier GR, Gatling JW, Applegate RLII. Comparison of web‐based and face‐to‐face interviews for application to an anesthesiology training program: a pilot study. Int J Med Educ 2016; 7: 102 – 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuchait P, Ruetzler T, Taylor J, Toldi N. Video interviewing: a potential selection tool for hospitality managers – a study to understand applicant perspective. Int J Hosp Manag 2014; 36: 90 – 100.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChapman DS, Uggerslev KL, Webster J. Applicant reactions to face‐to‐face and technology‐mediated interviews: a field investigation. J Appl Psychol 2003; 88: 944 – 53.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBallejos MP, Oglesbee S, Hettema J, Sapien R. An equivalence study of interview platform: does videoconference technology impact medical school acceptance rates of different groups? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2018; 23: 601 – 10.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUdeagu CC, Shah S, Toussaint MM, Pickett L. Sociodemographic differences in clients preferring video‐call over in‐person interview: a pilot study of HIV tele‐partner services. AIDS Behav 2017; 21: 3078 – 86.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBird SB, Hern HG, Blomkalns A, et al. Innovation in residency selection: the AAMC standardized video interview. Acad Med 2019; 94: 1489 – 97.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAssociation of American Medical Colleges. About the SVI. Available at: Available at: https://students‐residents.aamc.org/applying‐residency/article/about‐svi/. Accessed Apr 27, 2020
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarcy D, Aintablian H, Friedman V, et al. Joint Letter to the AAMC on the Standardized Video Interview (SVI). Available at: https://www.aaem.org/current‐news/joint‐letter‐to‐the‐aamc‐on‐the‐svi. Accessed Apr 24, 2020
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Resident Matching Program. Match Agreements & Resources. 2020. Available at: http://www.nrmp.org/match‐participation‐agreements/. Accessed Apr 26, 2020
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStephenson‐Famy A, Houmard BS, Oberoi S, Manyak A, Chiang S, Kim S. Use of the interview in resident candidate selection: a review of the literature. J Grad Med Educ 2015; 7: 539 – 48.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Resident Matching Program. Results of the 2018 NRMP Program Director Survey. 2018. Available at: https://www.nrmp.org/wp‐content/uploads/2018/07/NRMP‐2018‐Program‐Director‐Survey‐for‐WWW.pdf. Accessed Apr 26, 2020,
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
aet210486_am.pdf
Size:
162.9KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
aet210486.pdf
Size:
202.4KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.