View Item 

Show simple item record

Optimizing the measurement of health‐related quality of life in adolescents and young adults with cancer
dc.contributor.authorSalsman, John M.
dc.contributor.authorDanhauer, Suzanne C.
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Justin B.
dc.contributor.authorCanzona, Mollie R.
dc.contributor.authorVictorson, David E.
dc.contributor.authorZebrack, Bradley J.
dc.contributor.authorReeve, Bryce B.
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-04T16:02:07Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHS
dc.date.available2020-11-04T16:02:07Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-15
dc.identifier.citationSalsman, John M.; Danhauer, Suzanne C.; Moore, Justin B.; Canzona, Mollie R.; Victorson, David E.; Zebrack, Bradley J.; Reeve, Bryce B. (2020). "Optimizing the measurement of health‐related quality of life in adolescents and young adults with cancer." Cancer 126(22): 4818-4824.
dc.identifier.issn0008-543X
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/163469
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherAmerican Cancer Society
dc.subject.otheroncology
dc.subject.otherpatient‐reported outcomes
dc.subject.otheradolescent and young adult
dc.subject.otherhealth‐related quality of life
dc.subject.othermeasurement
dc.titleOptimizing the measurement of health‐related quality of life in adolescents and young adults with cancer
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematology
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163469/2/cncr33155.pdfen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163469/1/cncr33155_am.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncr.33155
dc.identifier.sourceCancer
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobert RS, Paxton RJ, Palla SL, et al. Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the pediatric quality of life inventory™ generic core scales, cancer module, and multidimensional fatigue scale in long‐term adult survivors of pediatric cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012; 59: 703 ‐ 707.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClinton‐McHarg T, Carey M, Sanson‐Fisher R, Shakeshaft A, Rainbird K. Measuring the psychosocial health of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors: a critical review. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010; 8: 25.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZebrack BJ, Donohue JE, Gurney JG, Chesler MA, Bhatia S, Landier W. Psychometric evaluation of the impact of cancer (IOC‐CS) scale for young adult survivors of childhood cancer. Qual Life Res. 2010; 19: 207 ‐ 218.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePark C, Wortmann J, Hale A, Cho D, Blank T. Assessing quality of life in young adult cancer survivors: development of the Survivorship‐Related Quality of Life scale. Qual Life Res. 2014; 23: 2213 ‐ 2224.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBhatia S, Jenney ME, Bogue MK, et al. The Minneapolis‐Manchester Quality of Life instrument: reliability and validity of the Adolescent Form. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20: 4692 ‐ 4698.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBhatia S, Jenney ME, Wu E, et al. The Minneapolis‐Manchester Quality of Life instrument: reliability and validity of the Youth Form. J Pediatr. 2004; 145: 39 ‐ 46.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVarni JW, Katz ER, Seid M, Quiggins DJ, Friedman‐Bender A. The pediatric cancer quality of life inventory‐32 (PCQL‐32): I. Reliability and validity. Cancer. 1998; 82: 1184 ‐ 1196.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeid M, Varni JW, Rode CA, Katz ER. The Pediatric Cancer Quality of Life Inventory: a modular approach to measuring health‐related quality of life in children with cancer. Int J Cancer Suppl. 1999; 12: 71 ‐ 76.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVarni JW, Burwinkle TM, Katz ER, Meeske K, Dickinson P. The PedsQL in pediatric cancer: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Generic Core Scales, Multidimensional Fatigue Scale, and Cancer Module. Cancer. 2002; 94: 2090 ‐ 2106.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVarni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care. 2001; 39: 800 ‐ 812.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTucker‐Seeley RD, Yabroff KR. Minimizing the “financial toxicity” associated with cancer care: advancing the research agenda. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016; 108: djv410.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHealthMeasures. HealthMeasures (introduction). Published 2017. Accessed June 12, 2020. http://www.healthmeasures.net/index.php
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, et al. The Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care. 2007; 45 ( 5 suppl 1 ): S3 ‐ S11.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHealth Measures. PROMIS Health Organization and PROMIS Cooperative Group. PROMIS® Instrument Development and Validation: Scientific Standards Version 2.0 (revised May 2013). Published 2013. Access April 2, 2020. http://www.nihpromis.org/Documents/PROMISStandards_Vers2.0_Final.pdf
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLasch KE, Marquis P, Vigneux M, et al. PRO development: rigorous qualitative research as the crucial foundation. Qual Life Res. 2010; 19: 1087 ‐ 1096.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHealth Measures. PROMIS Health Organization and PROMIS Cooperative Group. PROMIS® Instrument Maturity Model (revised May 2013). Published 2013. Access date April 2, 2020. http://www.healthmeasures.net/images/PROMIS/PROMISStandards_Vers_2_0_MaturityModelOnly_508.pdf
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTulsky DS, Kisala PA, Boulton AJ, et al. Determining a transitional scoring link between PROMIS® pediatric and adult physical health measures. Qual Life Res. 2019; 28: 1217 ‐ 1229.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReeve BB, Thissen D, DeWalt DA, et al. Linkage between the PROMIS® pediatric and adult emotional distress measures. Qual Life Res. 2016; 25: 823 ‐ 833.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTerwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RW, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2011; 21: 651 ‐ 657.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010; 19: 539 ‐ 549.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. Protocol of the COSMIN study: COnsensus‐based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006; 6: 2.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010; 10: 22.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSt Germain D, Denicoff A, Torres A, et al. Reporting of health‐related quality of life endpoints in National Cancer Institute–supported cancer treatment trials. Cancer. 2020; 126: 2687 ‐ 2693.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBasch E. The missing voice of patients in drug‐safety reporting. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362: 865 ‐ 869.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAu HJ, Ringash J, Brundage M, Palmer M, Richardson H, Meyer RM; NCIC CTG Quality of Life Committee. Added value of health‐related quality of life measurement in cancer clinical trials: the experience of the NCIC CTG. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010; 10: 119 ‐ 128.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSecord AA, Coleman RL, Havrilesky LJ, Abernethy AP, Samsa GP, Cella D. Patient‐reported outcomes as end points and outcome indicators in solid tumours. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015; 12: 358 ‐ 370.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCella D. In our patient‐centered era, it is time we gave patient‐reported outcomes their due. Cancer. 2020; 126: 2592 ‐ 2593.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith AB, Cocks K, Parry D, Taylor M. Reporting of health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) data in oncology trials: a comparison of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ‐C30) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–General (FACT‐G). Qual Life Res. 2014; 23: 971 ‐ 976.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMack JW. The PRISM intervention for adolescents and young adults with cancer: paying attention to the patient as a whole person. Cancer. 2018; 124: 3802 ‐ 3805.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2020. American Cancer Society; 2020. Accessed April 20, 2020. https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer‐facts‐statistics/all‐cancer‐facts‐figures/cancer‐facts‐figures‐2020.html
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith AW, Bellizzi KM, Keegan THM, et al. Health‐related quality of life of adolescent and young adult cancer patients in the United States: the AYA HOPE study. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31: 2136 ‐ 2145.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSalsman JM, Garcia SF, Yanez B, Sanford SD, Snyder MA, Victorson D. Physical, emotional, and social health differences between post‐treatment young adults with cancer and matched healthy controls. Cancer. 2014; 120: 2247 ‐ 2254.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVictorson D, Garcia SF, Sanford S, Snyder MA, Lampert S, Salsman JM. A qualitative focus group study to illuminate the lived emotional and social impacts of cancer and its treatment on young adults. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2019; 8: 649 ‐ 659.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHusson O, Zebrack BJ, Block R, et al. Health‐related quality of life in adolescent and young adult patients with cancer: a longitudinal study. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35: 652 ‐ 659.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVetsch J, Wakefield CE, McGill BC, et al. Educational and vocational goal disruption in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2018; 27: 532 ‐ 538.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZebrack B, Kent EE, Keegan TH, Kato I, Smith AW. “Cancer sucks,” and other ponderings by adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2014; 32: 1 ‐ 15.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeegan TH, Lichtensztajn DY, Kato I, et al. Unmet adolescent and young adult cancer survivors information and service needs: a population‐based cancer registry study. J Cancer Surviv. 2012; 6: 239 ‐ 250.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKetterl TG, Syrjala KL, Casillas J, et al. Lasting effects of cancer and its treatment on employment and finances in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. Cancer. 2019; 125: 1908 ‐ 1917.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeegan TH, Ries LA, Barr RD, et al. Comparison of cancer survival trends in the United States of adolescents and young adults with those in children and older adults. Cancer. 2016; 122: 1009 ‐ 1016.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoke DJ, Tsai K, Hamilton AS, et al. Emerging cancer survival trends, disparities, and priorities in adolescents and young adults: a California Cancer Registry–based study. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019; 3: pkz031.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith AW, Seibel NL, Lewis DR, et al. Next steps for adolescent and young adult oncology workshop: an update on progress and recommendations for the future. Cancer. 2016; 122: 988 ‐ 999.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarr RD, Ferrari A, Ries L, Whelan J, Bleyer WA. Cancer in adolescents and young adults: a narrative review of the current status and a view of the future. JAMA Pediatr. 2016; 170: 495 ‐ 501.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmitherman AB, Anderson C, Lund JL, Bensen JT, Rosenstein DL, Nichols HB. Frailty and comorbidities among survivors of adolescent and young adult cancer: a cross‐sectional examination of a hospital‐based survivorship cohort. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2018; 7: 374 ‐ 383.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSalsman JM, Bingen K, Barr RD, Freyer DR. Understanding, measuring, and addressing the financial impact of cancer on adolescents and young adults. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019; 66: e27660.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePollock BH. What’s missing in the assessment of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer outcomes? J Natl Cancer Inst. Published online March 3, 2020. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa015
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Cancer Institute. Childhood Cancer Data Initiative (CCDI). Published 2020. Access June 12, 2020. https://www.cancer.gov/research/areas/childhood/childhood‐cancer‐data‐initiative
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeWalt DA, Rothrock N, Yount S, Stone AA; PROMIS Cooperative Group. Evaluation of item candidates: the PROMIS Qualitative Item Review. Med Care. 2007; 45 ( 5 suppl 1 ): S12 ‐ S21.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReeve BB, Hays RD, Bjorner JB, et al. Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health‐related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Med Care. 2007; 45 ( 5 suppl 1 ): S22 ‐ S31.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWorld Health Organization. Constitution of the World Health Organization. World Health Organization; 1946.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePilkonis PA, Choi SW, Reise SP, Stover AM, Riley WT, Cella D; PROMIS Cooperative Group. Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment. 2011; 18: 263 ‐ 283.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarcia SF, Wagner LI, Choi S, George J, Cella D. PROMIS‐compatible perceived cognitive function item banks for people with cancer. Paper presented at: Second Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Conference; March 2008; Bethesda, MD.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHahn EA, Devellis RF, Bode RK, et al. Measuring social health in the patient‐reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): item bank development and testing. Qual Life Res. 2010; 19: 1035 ‐ 1044.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYu L, Buysse DJ, Germain A, et al. Development of short forms from the PROMIS sleep disturbance and sleep‐related impairment item banks. Behav Sleep Med. 2011; 10: 6 ‐ 24.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLai JS, Cella D, Choi S, Teresi JA, Hays RD, Stone AA. Developing a fatigue item bank for the Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS FIB version 1). Presented at: International Conference on Survey Methods in Multinational, Multiregional, and Multicultural Contexts (3MC); June 25‐29, 2008; Berlin, Germany.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmtmann D, Cook KF, Jensen MP, et al. Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference. Pain. 2010; 150: 173 ‐ 182.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRevicki DA, Cook KF, Amtmann D, Harnam N, Chen WH, Keefe FJ. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the PROMIS pain quality item bank. Qual Life Res. 2014; 23: 245 ‐ 255.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRose M, Bjorner JB, Gandek B, Bruce B, Fries JF, Ware JE Jr. The PROMIS Physical Function item bank was calibrated to a standardized metric and shown to improve measurement efficiency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014; 67: 516 ‐ 526.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeinfurt KP, Lin L, Bruner DW, et al. Development and initial validation of the PROMIS(®) Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measures Version 2.0. J Sex Med. 2015; 12: 1961 ‐ 1974.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHinds PS, Nuss SL, Ruccione KS, et al. PROMIS pediatric measures in pediatric oncology: valid and clinically feasible indicators of patient‐reported outcomes. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013; 60: 402 ‐ 408.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarcia SF, Cella D, Clauser SB, et al. Standardizing patient‐reported outcomes assessment in cancer clinical trials: a Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System initiative. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 5106 ‐ 5112.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFlynn KE, Lin L, Cyranowski JM, et al. Development of the NIH PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction measures in patients with cancer. J Sex Med. 2013; 10 ( suppl 1 ): 43 ‐ 52.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReeve BB, McFatrich M, Mack JW, et al. Expanding construct validity of established and new PROMIS pediatric measures for children and adolescents receiving cancer treatment. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020; 67: e28160.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHinds PS, Wang J, Cheng YI, et al. PROMIS pediatric measures validated in a longitudinal study design in pediatric oncology. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019; 66: e27606.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReeve BB, Edwards LJ, Jaeger BC, et al. Assessing responsiveness over time of the PROMIS® pediatric symptom and function measures in cancer, nephrotic syndrome, and sickle cell disease. Qual Life Res. 2018; 27: 249 ‐ 257.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJensen RE, Potosky AL, Reeve BB, et al. Validation of the PROMIS physical function measures in a diverse US population–based cohort of cancer patients. Qual Life Res. 2015; 24: 2333 ‐ 2344.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJensen RE, King‐Kallimanis BL, Sexton E, et al. Measurement properties of PROMIS Sleep Disturbance short forms in a large, ethnically diverse cancer cohort. Psychol Test Assess Modeling. 2016; 58: 353 ‐ 370.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBleyer A, Barr R, Hayes‐Lattin B, Thomas D, Ellis C, Anderson B. The distinctive biology of cancer in adolescents and young adults. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008; 8: 288 ‐ 298.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArnett JJ. Emerging adulthood: a theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am Psychol. 2000; 55: 469 ‐ 480.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSodergren SC, Husson O, Robinson J, et al. Systematic review of the health‐related quality of life issues facing adolescents and young adults with cancer. Qual Life Res. 2017; 26: 1659 ‐ 1672.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSalsman J, Snyder M, Zebrack B, Reeve B, Chen E. Measuring quality of life in adolescents and young adults (AYAS) with cancer: a promising solution? Ann Behav Med. 2016; 50 ( suppl 1 ): 1 ‐ 335.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith AW, Keegan T, Hamilton A, et al. Understanding care and outcomes in adolescents and young adult with cancer: a review of the AYA HOPE study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019; 66: e27486.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBellizzi KM, Smith A, Schmidt S, et al. Positive and negative psychosocial impact of being diagnosed with cancer as an adolescent or young adult. Cancer. 2012; 118: 5155 ‐ 5162.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQuinn GP, Huang IC, Murphy D, Zidonik‐Eddelton K, Krull KR. Missing content from health‐related quality of life instruments: interviews with young adult survivors of childhood cancer. Qual Life Res. 2013; 22: 111 ‐ 118.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQuinn GP, Goncalves V, Sehovic I, Bowman ML, Reed DR. Quality of life in adolescent and young adult cancer patients: a systematic review of the literature. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2015; 6: 19 ‐ 51.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
cncr33155_am.pdf
Size:
293.6KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
cncr33155.pdf
Size:
181.0KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.