Show simple item record

Impact of gastric per‐oral endoscopic myotomy on static and dynamic pyloric function in gastroparesis patients

dc.contributor.authorWatts, Lydia S.
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Jason R.
dc.contributor.authorLee, Allen A.
dc.contributor.authorHarer, Kimberly
dc.contributor.authorBowers, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorLaw, Ryan
dc.contributor.authorHasler, William L.
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-04T16:02:49Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHS
dc.date.available2020-11-04T16:02:49Z
dc.date.issued2020-11
dc.identifier.citationWatts, Lydia S.; Baker, Jason R.; Lee, Allen A.; Harer, Kimberly; Bowers, Nicole; Law, Ryan; Hasler, William L. (2020). "Impact of gastric per‐oral endoscopic myotomy on static and dynamic pyloric function in gastroparesis patients." Neurogastroenterology & Motility 32(11): n/a-n/a.
dc.identifier.issn1350-1925
dc.identifier.issn1365-2982
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/163489
dc.description.abstractBackgroundFunctional Lumen Imaging Probe (EndoFLIP) tests typically measure static pyloric parameters, but the pylorus exhibits phasic variations on manometry. Dynamic changes in pyloric function have not been quantified using EndoFLIP, and the impact of Gastric Per‐Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (G‐POEM) on static and dynamic pyloric activity in gastroparesis is unknown.MethodsEndoFLIP balloon inflation to 30, 40, and 50 mL was performed to measure mean, maximum, and minimum values and variability in pyloric diameter and distensibility before and after G‐POEM in 20 patients with refractory gastroparesis. The impact of phasic contractions on these pyloric measures was compared.Key ResultsG‐POEM increased mean (P < .0001) and maximum (P = .0002) pyloric diameters and mean (P = .02) and maximum (P = .02) pyloric distensibility on 50 mL EndoFLIP inflation but not intraballoon pressures or minimum diameters or distensibility. Temporal variability of pyloric diameter (P = .02) and distensibility (P = .02) also increased after G‐POEM. Phasic coupled contractions propagating from the antrum through the pylorus were observed in 37.5% of recordings; other phasic activity including isolated pyloric contractions were seen in 23.3%. Variability of pyloric diameter and distensibility tended to be higher during recordings with phasic activity. Some pyloric responses to G‐POEM were influenced by age, gastroparesis etiology, gastric emptying, and prior botulinum toxin injection.Conclusions & InferencesPyloric activity exhibits dynamic changes on EndoFLIP testing in gastroparesis. G‐POEM increases maximal but not minimal diameter and distensibility with increased variations, suggesting this therapy enhances pyloric opening but may not impair pyloric closure. Phasic pyloric contractions contribute to variations in pyloric activity.We employed Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (EndoFLIP)tests toshowincreases in pyloric diameter and variability of diameter after gastricperoralendoscopicmyotomy(G‐POEM ingastroparesis patients (left graphs). Variability of pyloric activity was noted before and after G‐POEM which was partly due to propagated antropyloriccontractions (3‐D plot on right) detected by EndoFLIP.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.othercontractility
dc.subject.othergastric emptying
dc.subject.othergastrointestinal motility
dc.subject.otherpyloromyotomy
dc.subject.otherpylorospasm
dc.titleImpact of gastric per‐oral endoscopic myotomy on static and dynamic pyloric function in gastroparesis patients
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialties
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163489/2/nmo13892_am.pdfen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163489/1/nmo13892.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/nmo.13892
dc.identifier.sourceNeurogastroenterology & Motility
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHinder RA, San‐Garde BA. Individual and combined roles of the pylorus and the antrum in the canine gastric emptying of a liquid and a digestible solid. Gastroenterology. 1983; 84: 281 ‐ 286.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJacques J, Pagnon L, Hure F, et al. Peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy is efficacious and safe for refractory gastroparesis: prospective trial with assessment of pyloric function. Endoscopy. 2019; 51: 40 ‐ 49.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMalik Z, Sankineni A, Parkman HP. Assessing pyloric sphincter pathophysiology using EndoFLIP in patients with gastroparesis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015; 27 ( 4 ): 524 ‐ 531.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGourcerol G, Tissier F, Melchior C, et al. Impaired fasting pyloric compliance in gastroparesis and the therapeutic response to pyloric dilatation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015; 41: 360 ‐ 367.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArroyo Vazquez JA, Bergstrom M, Bligh S, McMahon BP, Park PO. Exploring pyloric dynamics in stenting using a distensibility technique. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018; 30: e13445.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHasler WL, Baker J, Watts L, et al. Characterization of pyloric tonic and phasic pyloric motor activity using expanded EndoFLIP measures before and after G‐POEM for medication‐refractory gastroparesis (abstract). Gastroenterology. 2019; 156: S88 ‐ S89.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbell TL, Camilleri M, Donohoe K, et al. Consensus recommendations for gastric emptying scintigraphy: a joint report of the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008; 103: 753 ‐ 763.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhashab MA, Ngamruengphong S, Carr‐Locke D, et al. Gastric per‐oral endoscopic myotomy for refractory gastroparesis: results from the first multicenter study on endoscopic pyloromyotomy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2017; 85: 123 ‐ 128.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTao J, Patel V, Mekaroonkamol P, et al. Technical aspects of peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2019; 29: 117 ‐ 126.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbdelfatah MM, Li B, Kapil N, et al. Short‐term outcomes of double pyloromyotomy versus single pyloromyotomy at peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy in treatment of gastroparesis (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.016
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHojsgaard S, Halekoh U, Yan J. The R Package geepack for generalized estimating equations. J Stat Softw. 2005; 15: 1 ‐ 11.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeyer JH, Dressman J, Fink A, Amidon G. Effect of size and density on canine gastric emptying of nondigestible solids. Gastroenterology. 1985; 89: 805 ‐ 813.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeyer JH, Elashoff J, Porter‐Fink V, Dressman J, Amidon GL. Human postprandial gastric emptying of 1‐3‐millimeter spheres. Gastroenterology. 1988; 94: 1315 ‐ 1325.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStotzer PO, Abrahamsson H. Human postprandial gastric emptying of indigestible solids can occur unrelated to antral phase III. Neurogstroenterol Motil. 2000; 12: 415 ‐ 419.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHinder RA, Kelly KA. Canine gastric emptying of solids and liquids. Am J Physiol. 1977; 233: E335–E340.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeyer JH, Thomson JB, Cohen MB, Shadchehr A, Mandiola SA. Sieving of solid food by the canine stomach and sieving after gastric surgery. Gastroenterology. 1979; 76: 804 ‐ 813.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRhie JK, Hayashi Y, Welage LS, et al. Drug marker absorption in relation to pellet size, gastric motility and viscous meals in humans. Pharm Res. 1998; 15: 233 ‐ 238.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTreacy PJ, Jamieson GG, Dent J. The importance of the pylorus as a regulator of solid and liquid emptying from the stomach. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995; 10: 639 ‐ 645.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLadabaum U, Koshy SS, Woods ML, Hooper FG, Owyang C, Hasler WL. Differential symptomatic and electrogastrographic effects of distal and proximal human gastric distention. Am J Physiol. 1998; 275: G418 ‐ G425.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePasricha PJ, Yates KP, Nguyen L, et al. Outcomes and factors associated with reduced symptoms in patients with gastroparesis. Gastroenterology. 2015; 149: 1762 ‐ 1774.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceColeski R, Baker JR, Hasler WL. Endoscopic gastric food retention in relation to scintigraphic gastric emptying delays and clinical factors. Dig Dis Sci. 2016; 61: 2593 ‐ 2601.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson MJ, Sippey M, Marks J. Gastric per oral pyloromyotomy for post‐vagotomy‐induced gastroparesis following esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24: 715 – 719.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBenias PC, Khashab MA. Gastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy therapy for refractory gastroparesis. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2017; 15: 637 ‐ 647.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUppal DS, Wang AY. Update on the endoscopic treatments for achalasia. World J Gastroenterol. 2016; 22: 8670 ‐ 8683.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith CD, Stival A, Howell DL, Swafford V. Endoscopic therapy for achalasia before Heller myotomy results in worse outcomes than Heller myotomy alone. Ann Surg. 2006; 243: 579 ‐ 584.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinley CJ, Kondra J, Clifton J, Yee J, Finley R. Factors associated with postoperative symptoms after laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010; 89: 392 ‐ 396.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWatts L, Baker JR, Lee AA, Bowers N, Law R, Hasler WL. Using EndoFLIP to compare static and dynamic pyloric motor function before and after G‐POEM for treatment of refractory gastroparesis (abstract). Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019; 31: 5.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTougas G, Eaker EY, Abell TL, et al. Assessment of gastric emptying using a low fat meal: establishment of international control values. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000; 95: 1456 ‐ 1462.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMearin F, Camilleri M, Malagelada JR. Pyloric dysfunction in diabetics with recurrent nausea and vomiting. Gastroenterology. 1986; 90: 1919 ‐ 1925.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMancini SA, Angelo JL, Peckler Z, Philp FH, Farah KF. Pyloroplasty for refractory gastroparesis. Am Surg. 2015; 81: 738 ‐ 746.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShada AL, Dunst CM, Pescarus R, et al. Laparoscopic pyloroplasty is a safe and effective first‐line surgical therapy for refractory gastroparesis. Surg Endosc. 2016; 30: 1326 ‐ 1332.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller LS, Szych GA, Kantor SB, et al. Treatment of idiopathic gastroparesis with injection of botulinum toxin into the pyloric sphincter muscle. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002; 97: 1653 ‐ 1660.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceColeski R, Anderson MA, Hasler WL. Factors associated with symptom response to pyloric injection of botulinum toxin in a large series of gastroparesis patients. Dig Dis Sci. 2009; 54: 2634 ‐ 2642.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReichenbach ZW, Stanek S, Patel S, et al. Botulinum toxin A improves symptoms of gastroparesis. Dig Dis Sci. 2020; 65: 1396 – 1404.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrong AT, Landreneau JP, Cline M, et al. Per‐Oral Pyloromyotomy (POP) for medically refractory post‐surgical gastroparesis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019; 23: 1095 ‐ 1103.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhang H, Zhang J, Jiang A, Ni H. Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy for gastroparesis: a systematic review of efficacy and safety. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 42: 413 ‐ 422.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMohan BP, Jha LK, et al. Clinical efficacy of gastric per‐oral endoscopic myotomy (G‐POEM) in the treatment of refractory gastroparesis and predictors of outcomes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis using surgical pyloroplasty as a comparator group. Surg Endosc 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07135-9
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpadaccini M, Maselli R, Chandrasekar VT, et al. Gastric peroral endoscopy pyloromyotomy for refractory gastroparesis: a systematic review of early outcomes with pooled analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91: 746 – 752.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHedberg HM, Carbray J, Ujiki MB. Initial experience with endoscopic pyloromyotomy with description and video of technique. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019; 23: 1706 ‐ 1710.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaadi M, Yu D, Malik Z, Parkman HP, Schey R. Pyloric sphincter characteristics using EndoFLIP ® in gastroparesis. Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2018; 83: 375 ‐ 384.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSnape WJ, Lin MS, Agarwal N, Shaw RE. Evaluation of the pylorus with concurrent intraluminal pressure and EndoFLIP in patients with nausea and vomiting. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016; 28: 758 ‐ 764.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.