Show simple item record

Measuring and Improving the Efficacy of Curation Activities in Data Archives

dc.contributor.authorAkmon, Dharma
dc.contributor.authorLafia, Sara
dc.contributor.authorThomer, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorHemphill, Libby
dc.contributor.authorPienta, Amy
dc.contributor.authorYakel, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorBleckley, David
dc.contributor.authorTyler, Allison
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-06T20:32:02Z
dc.date.available2020-11-06T20:32:02Z
dc.date.issued2020-11
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/163501
dc.description.abstractIt is well known that digital curation is critically important to ensuring the preservation, accessibility, and usability of digital collections. However, we know relatively little about the impact of specific curatorial actions (that is, discrete steps taken to improve a digital object) on the usability or accessibility of digital collections and datasets. The IMLS- and NSF-funded Measuring Impacts of Curatorial Actions (MICA) project is developing curatorial metrics using the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) data archive to evaluate the impact and efficacy of specific data curation processes. Curatorial metrics are statistical measures similar to bibliometrics but used to assess the impact of curatorial work on the use of collections. Using curation logs and other records, we develop and analyze a range of metrics from the last five years of data curation at the ICPSR. ICPSR is a highly impactful social science data repository, and provides us with a unique site and dataset for this study. We are additionally conducting interviews with ICPSR stakeholders to better understand how they see the impact of their work, and their data collections. Stakeholders include archive managers, data curators, data reusers, and more. These interviews provide insights into how we should prioritize curatorial actions to achieve impact, and return on our investment in data curation. In this poster we will present preliminary work identifying curatorial activities from interviews with ICPSR stakeholders and curator work tickets and discuss next steps in our research to develop metrics.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipInstitute of Museum and Library Services (LG-37-19-0134)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (#1930645).en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherResearch Data Alliance 16th Plenaryen_US
dc.subjectdata curationen_US
dc.subjectCuratorial metricsen_US
dc.subjectdata archivesen_US
dc.titleMeasuring and Improving the Efficacy of Curation Activities in Data Archivesen_US
dc.typePosteren_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelStatistics and Numeric Data
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163501/1/AkmonetalRDA16Poster.pdfen_US
dc.description.mapping-1en_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of AkmonetalRDA16Poster.pdf : Poster
dc.description.depositorSELFen_US
dc.owningcollnameInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.